|
|
(119 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| + | = Introduction = |
| + | |
| This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a [[Wide Spacing Approximation]]). | | This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a [[Wide Spacing Approximation]]). |
− | The theory uses the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] and [[Graf's Addition Theorem]] to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]]. | + | The theory uses the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] and [[Graf's Addition Theorem]] to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]]. [[Interaction Theory for Cylinders]] presents a simplified version for cylinders. |
| | | |
− | The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordiates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with its local coordinates. Using the [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]], which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained. | + | The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordinates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with its local coordinates. Using the [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]], which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained. |
| | | |
| The theory is described in [[Kagemoto and Yue 1986]] and in | | The theory is described in [[Kagemoto and Yue 1986]] and in |
− | [[Peter and Meylan 2004]]. | + | [[Peter and Meylan 2004]]. |
| + | |
| + | The derivation of the theory in [[Infinite Depth]] is also presented, see |
| + | [[Kagemoto and Yue Interaction Theory for Infinite Depth]]. |
| | | |
− | [[Category:Linear Water-Wave Theory]] | + | [[Category:Interaction Theory]] |
| | | |
| + | = Equations of Motion = |
| | | |
| + | The problem consists of <math>n</math> bodies |
| + | <math>\Delta_j</math> with immersed body |
| + | surface <math>\Gamma_j</math>. Each body is subject to |
| + | the [[Standard Linear Wave Scattering Problem]] and the particluar |
| + | equations of motion for each body (e.g. rigid, or freely floating) |
| + | can be different for each body. |
| + | It is a [[Frequency Domain Problem]] with frequency <math>\omega</math>. |
| + | The solution is exact, up to the |
| + | restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any |
| + | other body. |
| + | To simplify notation, <math>\mathbf{y} = (x,y,z)</math> always denotes a point |
| + | in the water, which is assumed to be of [[Finite Depth]] <math>h</math>, |
| + | while <math>\mathbf{x}</math> always denotes a point of the undisturbed water |
| + | surface assumed at <math>z=0</math>. |
| | | |
| + | {{standard linear wave scattering equations}} |
| | | |
| + | The [[Sommerfeld Radiation Condition]] is also imposed. |
| | | |
| + | =Eigenfunction expansion of the potential= |
| | | |
− | We extend the finite depth interaction theory of [[kagemoto86]] to
| + | Each body is subject to an incident potential and moves in response to this |
− | water of infinite depth and bodies of arbitrary geometry. The sum
| + | incident potential to produce a scattered potential. Each of these is |
− | over the discrete roots of the dispersion equation in the finite depth
| + | expanded using the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] |
− | theory becomes
| + | The scattered potential of a body |
− | an integral in the infinite depth theory. This means that the infinite
| + | <math>\Delta_j</math> can be expressed as |
− | dimensional diffraction
| + | <center><math> |
− | transfer matrix
| + | \phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = |
− | in the finite depth theory must be replaced by an integral
| + | \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} f_m(z) \sum_{\mu = - |
− | operator. In the numerical solution of the equations, this
| + | \infty}^{\infty} A_{m \mu}^j K_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_j}, |
− | integral operator is approximated by a sum and a linear system
| + | </math></center> |
− | of equations is obtained. We also show how the calculations
| + | with discrete coefficients <math>A_{m \mu}^j</math>, where <math>(r_j,\theta_j,z)</math> |
− | of the diffraction transfer matrix for bodies of arbitrary
| + | are cylindrical polar coordinates centered at each body |
− | geometry developed by [[goo90]] can be extended to
| + | <center><math> |
− | infinite depth, and how the diffraction transfer matrix for rotated bodies can
| + | f_m(z) = \frac{\cos k_m (z+h)}{\cos k_m h}. |
− | be easily calculated. This interaction theory is applied to the wave forcing
| + | </math></center> |
− | of multiple ice floes and a method to solve
| + | where <math>k_m</math> are found from <math>\alpha</math> by the [[Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface]] |
− | the full diffraction problem in this case is presented. Convergence | + | <center><math> |
− | studies comparing the interaction method with the full diffraction
| + | \alpha + k_m \tan k_m h = 0\,. |
− | calculations and the finite and infinite depth interaction methods are
| + | </math></center> |
− | carried out.
| + | where <math>k_0</math> is the |
| + | imaginary root with negative imaginary part |
| + | and <math>k_m</math>, <math>m>0</math>, are given the positive real roots ordered |
| + | with increasing size. |
| | | |
| + | The incident potential upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can be also be expanded in |
| + | regular cylindrical eigenfunctions, |
| + | <center><math> |
| + | \phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z) |
| + | \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^j I_\nu (k_n r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_j}, |
| + | </math></center> |
| + | with discrete coefficients <math>D_{n\nu}^j</math>. In these expansions, <math>I_\nu</math> |
| + | and <math>K_\nu</math> denote the modified [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_function : Bessel functions] |
| + | of the first and second kind, respectively, both of order <math>\nu</math>. |
| | | |
| + | Note that the term for <math>m =0</math> or |
| + | <math>n=0</math> corresponds to the propagating modes while the |
| + | terms for <math>m\geq 1</math> (<math>n\geq 1</math>) correspond to the evanescent modes. |
| | | |
| + | =Derivation of the system of equations= |
| | | |
| + | A system of equations for the unknown |
| + | coefficients of the |
| + | scattered wavefields of all bodies is developed. This system of |
| + | equations is based on transforming the |
| + | scattered potential of <math>\Delta_j</math> into an incident potential upon |
| + | <math>\Delta_l</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>). Doing this for all bodies simultaneously, |
| + | and relating the incident and scattered potential for each body, a system |
| + | of equations for the unknown coefficients is developed. |
| + | Making use of the periodicity of the geometry and of the ambient incident |
| + | wave, this system of equations can then be simplified. |
| | | |
− | ==Finite Depth Interaction Theory== | + | The scattered potential <math>\phi_j^{\mathrm{S}}</math> of body <math>\Delta_j</math> needs to be |
| + | represented in terms of the incident potential <math>\phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}</math> |
| + | upon <math>\Delta_l</math>, <math>j \neq l</math>. This can be accomplished by using |
| + | [[Graf's Addition Theorem]] |
| + | <center><math> |
| + | K_\tau(k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\tau (\theta_j-\varphi_{jl})} = |
| + | \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} K_{\tau + \nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \, |
| + | I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu (\pi - \theta_l + \varphi_{jl})}, \quad j \neq l, |
| + | </math></center> |
| + | which is valid provided that <math>r_l < R_{jl}</math>. Here, <math>(R_{jl},\varphi_{jl})</math> are the polar coordinates of the mean centre position of <math>\Delta_{l}</math> in the local coordinates of <math>\Delta_{j}</math>. |
| | | |
− | We will compare the performance of the infinite depth interaction theory
| + | The limitation <math>r_l < R_{jl}</math> only requires that the escribed cylinder of each body |
− | with the equivalent theory for finite
| + | <math>\Delta_l</math> does not enclose any other origin <math>O_j</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>). However, the |
− | depth. As we have stated previously, the finite depth theory was
| + | expansion of the scattered and incident potential in cylindrical |
− | developed by [[kagemoto86]] and extended to bodies of arbitrary
| + | eigenfunctions is only valid outside the escribed cylinder of each |
− | geometry by [[goo90]]. We will briefly present this theory in
| + | body. Therefore the condition that the |
− | our notation and the comparisons will be made in a later section.
| + | escribed cylinder of each body <math>\Delta_l</math> does not enclose any other |
| + | origin <math>O_j</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>) is superseded by the more rigorous |
| + | restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any |
| + | other body. |
| | | |
− | In water of constant finite depth <math>d</math>, the scattered potential of a body
| + | Making use of the eigenfunction expansion as well as [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential |
− | <math>\Delta_j</math> can be expanded in cylindrical eigenfunctions, | + | of <math>\Delta_j</math> can be expressed in terms of the |
− | <center><math> (basisrep_out_d) | + | incident potential upon <math>\Delta_l</math> as |
− | \phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) &= \frac{\cosh k(z+d)}{\cosh kd} | + | <center><math> |
− | \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{0 \nu}^j H_\nu^{(1)} (k r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu | + | \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z) |
− | \theta_j}\\ | + | = \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\tau = - |
− | &\quad + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos k_m (z+d)}{\cos kd} \sum_{\nu = -
| + | \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} |
− | \infty}^{\infty} A_{m \nu}^j K_\nu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
| + | (-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu |
− | \theta_j},
| + | \theta_l} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau-\nu) \varphi_{jl}} |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | with discrete coefficients <math>A_{m \nu}^j</math>. The positive wavenumber <math>k</math>
| + | <center><math> |
− | is related to <math>\alpha</math> by the dispersion relation
| + | = \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\nu = |
− | <center><math> (eq_k)
| + | -\infty}^{\infty} \Big[ \sum_{\tau = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j |
− | \alpha = k \tanh k d, | + | (-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) |
| + | \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | and the values of <math>k_m</math>, <math>m>0</math>, are given as positive real roots of
| + | The ambient incident wavefield <math>\phi^{\mathrm{In}}</math> can also be |
− | the dispersion relation
| + | expanded in the eigenfunctions corresponding to the incident wavefield upon |
− | <center><math> (eq_k_m)
| + | <math>\Delta_l</math>. Let <math>\tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l}</math> denote the coefficients of this |
− | \alpha + k_m \tan k_m d = 0. | + | ambient incident wavefield in the incoming eigenfunction expansion for |
− | </math></center> | + | <math>\Delta_l</math> (cf. the example in [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]]). |
− | The incident potential upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can be also be expanded in
| + | <center><math> |
− | cylindrical eigenfunctions,
| + | \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} |
− | <center><math> (basisrep_in_d) | + | \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} I_\nu (k_n |
− | \phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) &= \frac{\cosh k(z+d)}{\cosh kd} | + | r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. |
− | \sum_{\mu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{0 \mu}^j J_\mu (k r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu | |
− | \theta_j}\\ | |
− | & \quad + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos k_m (z+d)}{\cos kd} \sum_{\mu = -
| |
− | \infty}^{\infty} D_{m\mu}^j I_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
| |
− | \theta_j}, | |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | with discrete coefficients <math>D_{m\mu}^j</math>. A system of equations for the
| + | The total |
− | coefficients of the scattered wavefields for the bodies are derived
| + | incident wavefield upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can now be expressed as |
− | in an analogous way to the infinite depth case. The derivation is
| |
− | simpler because all the coefficients are discrete and the
| |
− | diffraction transfer operator can be represented by an
| |
− | infinite dimensional matrix.
| |
− | Truncating the infinite dimensional matrix as well as the
| |
− | coefficient vectors appropriately, the resulting system of
| |
− | equations is given by
| |
| <center><math> | | <center><math> |
− | {\bf a}_l = {\bf B}_l \Big( {\bf d}_l^\mathrm{In} + | + | \phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) = \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) + |
− | \sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq l}}^{N} \trans {\bf T}_{jl} \,
| + | \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \, \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} |
− | {\bf a}_j \Big), \quad l=1, \ldots, N,
| + | (r_l,\theta_l,z) |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | where <math>{\bf a}_l</math> is the coefficient vector of the scattered
| + | This allows us to write |
− | wave, <math>{\bf d}_l^\mathrm{In}</math> is the coefficient vector of the
| + | <center><math> |
− | ambient incident wave, <math>{\bf B}_l</math> is the diffraction transfer
| + | \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z) |
− | matrix of <math>\Delta_l</math> and <math>{\bf T}_{jl}</math> is the coordinate transformation
| + | \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^l I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l} |
− | matrix analogous to (T_elem_deep).
| |
− | | |
− | The calculation of the diffraction transfer matrices is
| |
− | also similar to the infinite depth case. The finite depth
| |
− | Green's function
| |
− | <center><math> (green_d) | |
− | &G(r,\theta,z;s,\varphi,c)\\ &= \frac{\i}{2} \,
| |
− | \frac{\alpha^2-k^2}{d(\alpha^2-k^2)-\alpha}\, \cosh k(z+d) \cosh k(c+d)
| |
− | \sum_{\nu=-\infty}^{\infty} H_\nu^{(1)}(k r) J_\nu(k s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu | |
− | (\theta - \varphi)}\\
| |
− | & \quad + \frac{1}{\pi} \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}
| |
− | \frac{k_m^2+\alpha^2}{d(k_m^2+\alpha^2)-\alpha}\, \cos k_m(z+d) \cos
| |
− | k_m(c+d) \sum_{\nu=-\infty}^{\infty} K_\nu(k_m r) I_\nu(k_m s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
| |
− | (\theta - \varphi)},
| |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | given by [[black75]] and [[fenton78]], needs to be used instead
| + | <center><math> |
− | of the infinite depth Green's function (green_inf).
| + | = \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} |
− | The elements of <math>{\bf B}_j</math> are therefore given by
| + | \Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + |
− | <center><math> (B_elem_d) | + | \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = |
− | <center><math>\begin{matrix}
| + | -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n |
− | ({\bf B}_j)_{pq} &= \frac{\i}{2} \,
| + | R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_n |
− | \frac{(\alpha^2-k^2)\cosh^2 kd}{d(\alpha^2-k^2)-\alpha} \int\limits_{\Gamma_j}
| + | r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. |
− | \cosh k(c+d) J_p(\alpha s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p \varphi} \varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta}) | |
− | \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}\\ | |
− | =and= | |
− | ({\bf B}_j)_{pq} &= \frac{1}{\pi}
| |
− | \frac{(k_m^2+\alpha^2)\cos^2 k_md}{d(k_m^2+\alpha^2)-\alpha}
| |
− | \int\limits_{\Gamma_j} \cos k_m(c+d) I_p(\eta s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p | |
− | \varphi} \varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta}) \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}
| |
− | \end{matrix}</math></center>
| |
− | </math></center>
| |
− | for the propagating and the decaying modes respectively, where
| |
− | <math>\varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta})</math> is the source strength distribution
| |
− | due to an incident potential of mode <math>q</math> of the form
| |
− | <center><math> (test_modes_d)
| |
− | <center><math>\begin{matrix}
| |
− | \phi_q^{\mathrm{I}}(s,\varphi,c) &= \frac{\cosh k_m(c+d)}{\cosh kd} | |
− | H_q^{(1)} (k s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \varphi}\\
| |
− | =for the propagating modes, and=
| |
− | \phi_q^{\mathrm{I}}(s,\varphi,c) &= \frac{\cos k_m(c+d)}{\cos kd} K_q
| |
− | (k_m s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \varphi}
| |
− | \end{matrix}</math></center> | |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | for the decaying modes.
| + | It therefore follows that |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | ==Numerical Results==
| |
− | | |
− | In this section we will present some calculations using the interaction
| |
− | theory in finite and infinite depth and the full
| |
− | diffraction method in finite and infinite depth.
| |
− | These will be based on calculations for ice floes. We begin with some
| |
− | convergence tests which aim to compare the various methods. It needs
| |
− | to be noted that this comparison is only of numerical nature since the
| |
− | interactions methods as well as the full diffraction calculations
| |
− | are exact in an analytical sense. However, numerical calculations
| |
− | require truncations which affect the different methods in different
| |
− | ways. Especially the dependence on these truncations will be investigated.
| |
− | | |
− | ===Convergence Test===
| |
− | We will present some convergence tests that aim to compare the
| |
− | performance of the interaction theory with the full diffraction
| |
− | calculations and to compare the
| |
− | performance of the finite and infinite depth interaction methods in deep water.
| |
− | The comparisons will be conducted for the case of two square ice floes
| |
− | in three different arrangements.
| |
− | In the full diffraction calculation the ice floes
| |
− | are discretised in <math>24 \times 24 = 576</math> elements. For the full diffraction
| |
− | calculation the resulting linear system of equations to be solved is
| |
− | therefore 1152. As will be seen, once the diffraction | |
− | transfer matrix has been calculated (and saved), the dimension of the
| |
− | linear system of equations to be solved in the interaction method is
| |
− | considerably smaller. It is given by twice the dimension of the
| |
− | diffraction transfer matrix. The most challenging situation for the
| |
− | interaction theory is when the bodies are close together. For this
| |
− | reason we choose the distance such that the escribed circles
| |
− | of the two ice floes just overlap. It must be recalled that the
| |
− | interaction theory is valid as long as the escribed cylinder of a body
| |
− | does not intersect with any other body.
| |
− | | |
− | Both ice floes have non-dimensionalised
| |
− | stiffness <math>\beta = 0.02</math>, mass <math>\gamma = 0.02</math> and Poisson's ratio
| |
− | is chosen as <math>\nu=0.3333</math>. The wavelength of
| |
− | the ambient incident wave is <math>\lambda = 2</math>. Each ice floe has
| |
− | side length 2. The ambient
| |
− | wavefield is of unit amplitude and propagates in the <math>x</math>-direction.
| |
− | Three different arrangements are chosen to compare the results of the
| |
− | finite depth interaction method in deep water and the infinite depth
| |
− | interaction method with the corresponding full diffraction
| |
− | calculations. In the first arrangement the second ice floe is located
| |
− | behind the first, in the second arrangement it is located
| |
− | beside, and the third arrangement it is both
| |
− | beside and behind. The exact positions of the ice floes
| |
− | are given in table (tab:pos).
| |
− | | |
− | \begin{table}
| |
− | \begin{center}
| |
− | \begin{tabular}{@{}ccc@{}}
| |
− | arrangement & <math>O_1</math> & <math>O_2</math>\<center><math>3pt]
| |
− | 1 & <math>(-1.4,0)</math> & <math>(1.4,0)</math>\\
| |
− | 2 & <math>(0,-1.4)</math> & <math>(0,1.4)</math>\\
| |
− | 3 & <math>(-1.4,-0.6)</math> & <math>(1.4,0.6)</math>
| |
− | \end{tabular}
| |
− | \caption{Positions of the ice floes in the different arrangements.} (tab:pos)
| |
− | \end{center}
| |
− | \end{table}
| |
− | | |
− | Figure (fig:tsf) shows the
| |
− | solutions corresponding to the three arrangements in the case of water
| |
− | of infinite depth. To illustrate the effect on the water in the
| |
− | vicinity of the ice floes, the water displacement is also shown.
| |
− | It is interesting
| |
− | to note that the ice floe in front is barely influenced by the
| |
− | floe behind while the motion of the floe behind is quite
| |
− | different from its motion in the absence of the floe in front.
| |
− | | |
− | \begin{figure}
| |
− | \begin{center}
| |
− | | |
− | \includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x0_y28_v5_b02_chi2}\<center><math>0.4cm]
| |
− | \includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x0_y28_v5_b02_chi0}\<center><math>0.4cm]
| |
− | \includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x12_y28_v5_b02_chi2}
| |
− | | |
− | \end{center}
| |
− | \caption{Surface displacement of the ice floes
| |
− | and the water in their vicinity,\newline arrangements 1, 2 and 3.} (fig:tsf)
| |
− | \end{figure}
| |
− | | |
− | To compare the results, a measure of
| |
− | the error from the full diffraction calculation is used. We calculate
| |
− | the full diffraction solution with a sufficient number of points
| |
− | so that we may use it to approximate the exact solution.
| |
| <center><math> | | <center><math> |
− | E_2 = \left( \, \int\limits_{\Delta}
| + | D_{n\nu}^l = |
− | \big| w_{i}(\mathbf{x})-w_{f}(\mathbf{x}) \big|^2 \mathrm{d}\mathbf{x} \, | + | \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + |
− | \right)^{1/2}, | + | \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = |
| + | -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n |
| + | R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | where <math>w_{i}</math> and <math>w_{f}</math> are the solutions of the
| |
− | interaction method and the corresponding full diffraction calculation
| |
− | respectively. It would also be possible to compare other errors, the
| |
− | maximum difference of the solutions for example, but the results are
| |
− | very similar.
| |
− |
| |
− | It is worth noting that the finite depth interaction method
| |
− | only converges up to a certain depth if used with the
| |
− | eigenfunction expansion of the finite depth Green's function (green_d).
| |
− | This is because of the factor
| |
− | <math>\alpha^2-k^2</math> in the term of propagating modes of the Green's
| |
− | function. The Green's function can
| |
− | be rewritten by making use of the dispersion relation (eq_k)
| |
− | \cite[as suggested by][p. 26, for example]{linton01}
| |
− | and the depth restriction of the finite depth interaction method for
| |
− | bodies of arbitrary geometry can be circumvented.
| |
| | | |
− | The truncation parameters for the interaction methods will
| + | = Final Equations = |
− | now be considered for both finite and infinite depth.
| |
− | The number of propagating modes and angular decaying
| |
− | components are free parameters in both methods. In
| |
− | finite depth, the number of decaying roots of the dispersion relation
| |
− | needs to be chosen while in infinite depth the discretisation of
| |
− | a continuous variable must be selected.
| |
− | In the infinite depth case we are free to choose the number of
| |
− | points as well as the points themselves. In water of finite depth, the depth
| |
− | can also be considered a free parameter as long as it is chosen large
| |
− | enough to account for deep water.
| |
| | | |
− | Truncating the infinite sums in the eigenfunction expansion of the
| + | The scattered and incident potential of each body <math>\Delta_l</math> can be related by the |
− | outgoing water velocity potential for infinite depth with
| + | [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]] acting in the following way, |
− | truncation parameters <math>T_H</math> and <math>T_K</math> and discretising the integration
| |
− | by defining a set of nodes, </math>0\leq\eta_1 < \ldots < \eta_m < \ldots <
| |
− | \eta_{_{T_R}}<math>, with weights </math>h_m<math>, the potential for infinite depth | |
− | can be approximated by | |
| <center><math> | | <center><math> |
− | \phi (r,\theta,z) &= \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\nu = - | + | A_{m \mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{m n |
− | T_H}^{T_H} A_{0\nu} H_\nu^{(1)} (\alpha r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
| + | \mu \nu}^l D_{n\nu}^l. |
− | \theta}\\ | |
− | &\quad + \sum_{m=1}^{T_R} h_m \, \psi (z,\eta_m) \sum_{\nu = -
| |
− | T_K}^{T_K} A_{\nu} (\eta_m) K_\nu (\eta_m r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}.
| |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | In the following, the integration weights are chosen to be </math>h_m =
| + | |
− | 1/2\,(\eta_{m+1}-\eta_{m-1})<math>, </math>m=2, \ldots, T_R-1<math> and </math>h_1 =
| + | The substitution of this into the equation for relating |
− | \eta_2-\eta_1<math> as well as </math>h_{_{T_R}} =
| + | the coefficients <math>D_{n\nu}^l</math> and |
− | \eta_{_{T_R}}-\eta_{_{T_R-1}}<math>, which corresponds to the mid-point
| + | <math>A_{m \mu}^l</math>gives the |
− | quadrature rule.
| + | required equations to determine the coefficients of the scattered |
− | Different quadrature rules such as Gaussian quadrature
| + | wavefields of all bodies, |
− | could be considered. Although in general this would lead to better
| |
− | results, the mid-point rule allows a clever
| |
− | choice of the discretisation points so that the convergence with
| |
− | Gaussian quadrature is no better.
| |
− | In finite depth, the analogous truncation leads to
| |
| <center><math> | | <center><math> |
− | \phi (r,\theta,z) &= \frac{\cosh k (z+d)}{\cosh kd} \sum_{\nu = - | + | A_{m\mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} |
− | T_H}^{T_H} A_{0\nu} H_\nu^{(1)} (k r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}\\
| + | \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{mn\mu\nu}^l |
− | & \quad + \sum_{m = 1}^{T_R} \frac{\cos k_m(z+d)}{\cos k_m d}
| + | \Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + |
− | \sum_{\nu = - T_K}^{T_K} A_{m\nu} K_\nu (k_m r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}. | + | \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = |
| + | -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n |
| + | R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau -\nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big], |
| </math></center> | | </math></center> |
− | In both cases, the dimension of the diffraction transfer matrix,
| + | <math>m \in \mathbb{N}</math>, <math>\mu \in \mathbb{Z}</math>, <math>l=1,\dots,N</math>. |
− | <math>\mathbf{B}</math>, is given by <math>2 \, T_H+1+T_R \, (2 \, T_K+1)</math>. | |
− | | |
− | Since the choice of the number of propagating
| |
− | modes and angular decaying components affects the finite and
| |
− | infinite depth methods in similar ways, the dependence on these
| |
− | parameters will not be further presented. Thorough convergence tests
| |
− | have shown that in the settings investigated here, it is sufficient to
| |
− | choose <math>T_H</math> to be 11 and <math>T_K</math> to be 5. Further increasing these
| |
− | parameter values does not result in smaller errors (as compared
| |
− | to the full diffraction calculation with 576 elements per floe).
| |
− | We will now compare the convergence of the infinite depth and
| |
− | the finite depth methods if <math>T_H</math> and <math>T_K</math> are
| |
− | fixed (with the previously mentioned values) and <math>T_R</math> is varied. To be able to
| |
− | compare the results, the discretisation of the continuous variable
| |
− | will always be the same for fixed <math>T_R</math> and these are
| |
− | shown in table (tab:discr).
| |
− | It should be noted that if only one node is used the integration
| |
− | weight is chosen to be 1.
| |
− | | |
− | \begin{table}
| |
− | \begin{center}
| |
− | \begin{tabular}{@{}cl@{}} | |
− | <math>T_R</math> & discretisation of <math>\eta</math>\<center><math>3pt]
| |
− | 1 & \{ 2.1 \}\\
| |
− | 2 & \{ 1.2, 2.7 \}\\
| |
− | 3 & \{ 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 \}\\
| |
− | 4 & \{ 0.4, 1.4, 2.2, 3.2 \}\\
| |
− | 5 & \{ 0.2, 1.0, 1.8, 3.0, 4.6 \}
| |
− | \end{tabular}
| |
− | \caption{The different discretisations used in the convergence tests.} (tab:discr)
| |
− | \end{center} | |
− | \end{table}
| |
− |
| |
− | Figures (fig:behind), (fig:beside) and (fig:shifted) show the convergence for arrangement 1, arrangement 2 and arrangement 3, respectively, for
| |
− | the infinite depth method and the finite depth method with depth 2
| |
− | (plot (a)) and depth 4 (plot (b)).
| |
− | Since the ice floes are located beside each other
| |
− | in arrangement 2 the average errors are the same for both floes.
| |
− | As can be seen from figures (fig:behind), (fig:beside) and
| |
− | (fig:shifted) the convergence of the infinite depth method
| |
− | is similar to that of the finite depth method. Used with depth 2, the
| |
− | convergence of the finite depth method is generally better than that
| |
− | of the infinite depth method while used with depth 4, the infinite depth
| |
− | method achieves the better results. Tests with other depths show that
| |
− | the performance of the finite depth method decreases with increasing
| |
− | water depth as expected. In general, since the wavelength is 2, a depth
| |
− | of <math>d=2</math> should approximate infinite depth and hence there is no
| |
− | advantage to using the infinite depth theory. However, as mentioned
| |
− | previously, for certain situations such as ice floes it is not necessarily
| |
− | true that <math>d=2</math> will approximate infinite depth.
| |
− | | |
− | \begin{figure}
| |
− | \begin{center}
| |
− | \begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}}
| |
− | \includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{behind_d2}&&
| |
− | \includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{behind_d4}
| |
− | \end{tabular}
| |
− | \caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
| |
− | arrangement 1.} (fig:behind)
| |
− | \end{center}
| |
− | \end{figure}
| |
− | | |
− | \begin{figure}
| |
− | \begin{center}
| |
− | \begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}}
| |
− | \includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{beside_d2}&&
| |
− | \includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{beside_d4}
| |
− | \end{tabular}
| |
− | \caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
| |
− | arrangement 2.} (fig:beside)
| |
− | \end{center}
| |
− | \end{figure}
| |
− | | |
− | \begin{figure}
| |
− | \begin{center}
| |
− | \begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}}
| |
− | \includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{shifted_d2}&&
| |
− | \includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{shifted_d4}
| |
− | \end{tabular}
| |
− | \caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
| |
− | arrangement 3.} (fig:shifted)
| |
− | \end{center}
| |
− | \end{figure}
| |
− | | |
− | ===Multiple ice floe results===
| |
− | We will now present results for multiple ice floes of different
| |
− | geometries and in different arrangements on water of infinite depth.
| |
− | We choose the floe arrangements arbitrarily, since there are
| |
− | no known special ice floe arrangements, such as those that give
| |
− | rise to resonances in the infinite limit.
| |
− | In all plots, the wavelength <math>\lambda</math> has been chosen to
| |
− | be <math>2</math>, the stiffness <math>\beta</math> and the mass <math>\gamma</math> of the ice
| |
− | floes to be 0.02 and Poisson's ratio <math>\nu</math> is <math>0.3333</math>. The ambient
| |
− | wavefield of amplitude 1 propagates in
| |
− | the positive direction of the <math>x</math>-axis, thus it travels from left to
| |
− | right in the plots.
| |
− | | |
− | Figure (fig:int_arb) shows the
| |
− | displacements of multiple interacting ice floes of different shapes and
| |
− | in different arrangements. Since square elements have been used to
| |
− | represent the floes, non-rectangular geometries are approximated.
| |
− | All ice floes have an area of 4 and the escribing circles do not
| |
− | intersect with any of the other ice floes.
| |
− | The plots show the displacement of the ice floes at time <math>t=0</math>.
| |
− | | |
− | \begin{figure}
| |
− | \begin{center}
| |
− | \begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.03\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}}
| |
− | \includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_tr_tr_tr_tr_in} &&
| |
− | \includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_tr_tr_tr_tr_out}\<center><math>0.2cm]
| |
− | \includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_rh_rh_rh} &&
| |
− | \includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_sq_sq_sq_sq_sq}\\
| |
− | \end{tabular}
| |
− | \end{center}
| |
− | \caption{Surface displacement of interacting ice floes of different geometries.} (fig:int_arb)
| |
− | \end{figure}
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | | |
− | ==Summary==
| |
− | The finite depth interaction theory developed by
| |
− | [[kagemoto86]] has been extended to water of infinite
| |
− | depth. Furthermore, using the eigenfunction
| |
− | expansion of the infinite depth free surface Green's function we have
| |
− | been able to calculate the diffraction transfer matrices for bodies of
| |
− | arbitrary geometry. We also showed how the diffraction transfer
| |
− | matrices can be calculated efficiently for different orientations of
| |
− | the body.
| |
− | | |
− | The convergence of the infinite depth interaction method is similar to
| |
− | that of the finite depth method. Generally, it can be said that the
| |
− | greater the water depth in the finite depth method the poorer its
| |
− | performance. Since bodies in the water can change the water depth
| |
− | which is required to allow the water to be approximated as infinitely
| |
− | deep (ice floes for example) it is recommendable to use the infinite
| |
− | depth method if the water depth may be considered
| |
− | infinite. Furthermore, the infinite depth method requires the infinite
| |
− | depth single diffraction solutions which are easier to
| |
− | compute than the finite depth solutions.
| |
− | It is also possible that the
| |
− | convergence of the infinite depth method may be further improved
| |
− | by a novel to optimisation of the discretisation of the continuous variable.</math>
| |
Introduction
This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a Wide Spacing Approximation).
The theory uses the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion and Graf's Addition Theorem to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated Diffraction Transfer Matrix. Interaction Theory for Cylinders presents a simplified version for cylinders.
The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using Graf's Addition Theorem, the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordinates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion associated with its local coordinates. Using the Diffraction Transfer Matrix, which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained.
The theory is described in Kagemoto and Yue 1986 and in
Peter and Meylan 2004.
The derivation of the theory in Infinite Depth is also presented, see
Kagemoto and Yue Interaction Theory for Infinite Depth.
Equations of Motion
The problem consists of [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] bodies
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] with immersed body
surface [math]\displaystyle{ \Gamma_j }[/math]. Each body is subject to
the Standard Linear Wave Scattering Problem and the particluar
equations of motion for each body (e.g. rigid, or freely floating)
can be different for each body.
It is a Frequency Domain Problem with frequency [math]\displaystyle{ \omega }[/math].
The solution is exact, up to the
restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any
other body.
To simplify notation, [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{y} = (x,y,z) }[/math] always denotes a point
in the water, which is assumed to be of Finite Depth [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math],
while [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{x} }[/math] always denotes a point of the undisturbed water
surface assumed at [math]\displaystyle{ z=0 }[/math].
The equations are the following
[math]\displaystyle{
\begin{align}
\Delta\phi &=0, &-h\lt z\lt 0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \Omega \\
\partial_z\phi &= 0, &z=-h, \\
\partial_z \phi &= \alpha \phi, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}},
\end{align}
}[/math]
(note that the last expression can be obtained from combining the expressions:
[math]\displaystyle{
\begin{align}
\partial_z \phi &= -\mathrm{i} \omega \zeta, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \\
\mathrm{i} \omega \phi &= g\zeta, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}},
\end{align}
}[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha = \omega^2/g \, }[/math])
[math]\displaystyle{
\partial_n\phi = \mathcal{L}\phi, \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega_B,
}[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{L} }[/math] is a linear
operator which relates the normal and potential on the body surface through the physics
of the body.
The Sommerfeld Radiation Condition is also imposed.
Eigenfunction expansion of the potential
Each body is subject to an incident potential and moves in response to this
incident potential to produce a scattered potential. Each of these is
expanded using the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion
The scattered potential of a body
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be expressed as
[math]\displaystyle{
\phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) =
\sum_{m=0}^{\infty} f_m(z) \sum_{\mu = -
\infty}^{\infty} A_{m \mu}^j K_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_j},
}[/math]
with discrete coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ A_{m \mu}^j }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ (r_j,\theta_j,z) }[/math]
are cylindrical polar coordinates centered at each body
[math]\displaystyle{
f_m(z) = \frac{\cos k_m (z+h)}{\cos k_m h}.
}[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ k_m }[/math] are found from [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] by the Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface
[math]\displaystyle{
\alpha + k_m \tan k_m h = 0\,.
}[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ k_0 }[/math] is the
imaginary root with negative imaginary part
and [math]\displaystyle{ k_m }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ m\gt 0 }[/math], are given the positive real roots ordered
with increasing size.
The incident potential upon body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be also be expanded in
regular cylindrical eigenfunctions,
[math]\displaystyle{
\phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z)
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^j I_\nu (k_n r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_j},
}[/math]
with discrete coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ D_{n\nu}^j }[/math]. In these expansions, [math]\displaystyle{ I_\nu }[/math]
and [math]\displaystyle{ K_\nu }[/math] denote the modified : Bessel functions
of the first and second kind, respectively, both of order [math]\displaystyle{ \nu }[/math].
Note that the term for [math]\displaystyle{ m =0 }[/math] or
[math]\displaystyle{ n=0 }[/math] corresponds to the propagating modes while the
terms for [math]\displaystyle{ m\geq 1 }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ n\geq 1 }[/math]) correspond to the evanescent modes.
Derivation of the system of equations
A system of equations for the unknown
coefficients of the
scattered wavefields of all bodies is developed. This system of
equations is based on transforming the
scattered potential of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] into an incident potential upon
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]). Doing this for all bodies simultaneously,
and relating the incident and scattered potential for each body, a system
of equations for the unknown coefficients is developed.
Making use of the periodicity of the geometry and of the ambient incident
wave, this system of equations can then be simplified.
The scattered potential [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} }[/math] of body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] needs to be
represented in terms of the incident potential [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_l^{\mathrm{I}} }[/math]
upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]. This can be accomplished by using
Graf's Addition Theorem
[math]\displaystyle{
K_\tau(k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\tau (\theta_j-\varphi_{jl})} =
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} K_{\tau + \nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \,
I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu (\pi - \theta_l + \varphi_{jl})}, \quad j \neq l,
}[/math]
which is valid provided that [math]\displaystyle{ r_l \lt R_{jl} }[/math]. Here, [math]\displaystyle{ (R_{jl},\varphi_{jl}) }[/math] are the polar coordinates of the mean centre position of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_{l} }[/math] in the local coordinates of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_{j} }[/math].
The limitation [math]\displaystyle{ r_l \lt R_{jl} }[/math] only requires that the escribed cylinder of each body
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] does not enclose any other origin [math]\displaystyle{ O_j }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]). However, the
expansion of the scattered and incident potential in cylindrical
eigenfunctions is only valid outside the escribed cylinder of each
body. Therefore the condition that the
escribed cylinder of each body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] does not enclose any other
origin [math]\displaystyle{ O_j }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]) is superseded by the more rigorous
restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any
other body.
Making use of the eigenfunction expansion as well as Graf's Addition Theorem, the scattered potential
of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be expressed in terms of the
incident potential upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] as
[math]\displaystyle{
\phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z)
= \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\tau = -
\infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
(-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
\theta_l} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau-\nu) \varphi_{jl}}
}[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{
= \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\nu =
-\infty}^{\infty} \Big[ \sum_{\tau = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j
(-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu)
\varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}.
}[/math]
The ambient incident wavefield [math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{In}} }[/math] can also be
expanded in the eigenfunctions corresponding to the incident wavefield upon
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math]. Let [math]\displaystyle{ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} }[/math] denote the coefficients of this
ambient incident wavefield in the incoming eigenfunction expansion for
[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] (cf. the example in Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion).
[math]\displaystyle{
\phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
\tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} I_\nu (k_n
r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}.
}[/math]
The total
incident wavefield upon body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can now be expressed as
[math]\displaystyle{
\phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) = \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) +
\sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \, \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}}
(r_l,\theta_l,z)
}[/math]
This allows us to write
[math]\displaystyle{
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z)
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^l I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}
}[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{
= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
\Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
\sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_n
r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}.
}[/math]
It therefore follows that
[math]\displaystyle{
D_{n\nu}^l =
\tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
\sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}}
}[/math]
Final Equations
The scattered and incident potential of each body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] can be related by the
Diffraction Transfer Matrix acting in the following way,
[math]\displaystyle{
A_{m \mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{m n
\mu \nu}^l D_{n\nu}^l.
}[/math]
The substitution of this into the equation for relating
the coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ D_{n\nu}^l }[/math] and
[math]\displaystyle{ A_{m \mu}^l }[/math]gives the
required equations to determine the coefficients of the scattered
wavefields of all bodies,
[math]\displaystyle{
A_{m\mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}
\sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{mn\mu\nu}^l
\Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
\sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau -\nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big],
}[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ m \in \mathbb{N} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ \mu \in \mathbb{Z} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ l=1,\dots,N }[/math].