Difference between revisions of "Kagemoto and Yue Interaction Theory"

From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(116 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
= Introduction =
 +
 
This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a [[Wide Spacing Approximation]]).
 
This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a [[Wide Spacing Approximation]]).
−
The theory uses the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] and [[Graf's Addition Theorem]] to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]].
+
The theory uses the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] and [[Graf's Addition Theorem]] to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]]. [[Interaction Theory for Cylinders]] presents a simplified version for cylinders.  
  
−
The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordiates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with its local coordinates. Using the [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]], which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained.   
+
The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordinates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with its local coordinates. Using the [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]], which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained.   
  
 
The theory is described in [[Kagemoto and Yue 1986]] and in
 
The theory is described in [[Kagemoto and Yue 1986]] and in
−
[[Peter and Meylan 2004]].
+
[[Peter and Meylan 2004]].
 +
 
 +
The derivation of the theory in [[Infinite Depth]] is also presented, see
 +
[[Kagemoto and Yue Interaction Theory for Infinite Depth]].
 
   
 
   
−
[[Category:Linear Water-Wave Theory]]
+
[[Category:Interaction Theory]]
  
 +
= Equations of Motion =
  
 +
The problem consists of <math>n</math> bodies
 +
<math>\Delta_j</math> with immersed body
 +
surface <math>\Gamma_j</math>. Each body is subject to
 +
the [[Standard Linear Wave Scattering Problem]] and the particluar
 +
equations of motion for each body (e.g. rigid, or freely floating)
 +
can be different for each body.
 +
It is a [[Frequency Domain Problem]] with frequency <math>\omega</math>.
 +
The solution is exact, up to the
 +
restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any
 +
other body.
 +
To simplify notation, <math>\mathbf{y} = (x,y,z)</math> always denotes a point
 +
in the water, which is assumed to be of [[Finite Depth]] <math>h</math>,
 +
while <math>\mathbf{x}</math> always denotes a point of the undisturbed water
 +
surface assumed at <math>z=0</math>.
  
 +
{{standard linear wave scattering equations}}
  
 +
The [[Sommerfeld Radiation Condition]] is also imposed.
  
 +
=Eigenfunction expansion of the potential=
  
−
We extend the finite depth interaction theory of [[kagemoto86]] to
+
Each body is subject to an incident potential and moves in response to this
−
water of infinite depth and bodies of arbitrary geometry. The sum
+
incident potential to produce a scattered potential. Each of these is
−
over the discrete roots of the dispersion equation in the finite depth
+
expanded using the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]]
−
theory becomes
+
The scattered potential of a body
−
an integral in the infinite depth theory. This means that the infinite
+
<math>\Delta_j</math> can be expressed as
−
dimensional diffraction
+
<center><math>
−
transfer matrix
+
\phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) =
−
in the finite depth theory must be replaced by an integral
+
\sum_{m=0}^{\infty} f_m(z) \sum_{\mu = -
−
operator. In the numerical solution of the equations, this
+
\infty}^{\infty} A_{m \mu}^j K_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_j},
−
integral operator is approximated by a sum and a linear system
+
</math></center>
−
of equations is obtained. We also show how the calculations
+
with discrete coefficients <math>A_{m \mu}^j</math>, where <math>(r_j,\theta_j,z)</math>
−
of the diffraction transfer matrix for bodies of arbitrary
+
are cylindrical polar coordinates centered at each body
−
geometry developed by [[goo90]] can be extended to
+
<center><math>
−
infinite depth, and how the diffraction transfer matrix for rotated bodies can
+
f_m(z) = \frac{\cos k_m (z+h)}{\cos k_m h}.
−
be easily calculated. This interaction theory is applied to the wave forcing
+
</math></center>
−
of multiple ice floes and a method to solve
+
where <math>k_m</math> are found from <math>\alpha</math> by the [[Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface]]
−
the full diffraction problem in this case is presented. Convergence
+
<center><math>
−
studies comparing the interaction method with the full diffraction
+
\alpha + k_m \tan k_m h = 0\,.
−
calculations and the finite and infinite depth interaction methods are
+
</math></center>
−
carried out.
+
where <math>k_0</math> is the
 +
imaginary root with negative imaginary part
 +
and <math>k_m</math>, <math>m>0</math>, are given the positive real roots ordered
 +
with increasing size.  
  
−
 
+
The incident potential upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can be also be expanded in
−
 
+
regular cylindrical eigenfunctions,  
−
 
+
<center><math>  
−
 
+
\phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z)
−
==The extension of Kagemoto and Yue's interaction
+
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^j I_\nu (k_n r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_j},
−
theory to bodies of arbitrary shape in water of infinite depth==
 
−
 
 
−
[[kagemoto86]] developed an interaction theory for
 
−
vertically non-overlapping axisymmetric structures in water of finite
 
−
depth. While their theory was valid for bodies of
 
−
arbitrary geometry, they did not develop all the necessary
 
−
details to apply the theory to arbitrary bodies.
 
−
The only requirements to apply this scattering theory is
 
−
that the bodies are vertically non-overlapping and
 
−
that the smallest cylinder which completely contains each body does not
 
−
intersect with any other body.
 
−
In this section we will extend their theory to bodies of
 
−
arbitrary geometry in water of infinite depth. The extension of
 
−
\citeauthor{kagemoto86}'s finite depth interaction theory to bodies of
 
−
arbitrary geometry was accomplished by [[goo90]].
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
The interaction theory begins by representing the scattered potential
 
−
of each body in the cylindrical eigenfunction expansion. Furthermore,
 
−
the incoming potential is also represented in the cylindrical
 
−
eigenfunction expansion. The operator which maps the incoming and
 
−
outgoing representation is called the diffraction transfer matrix and
 
−
is different for each body.
 
−
Since these representations are local to each body, a mapping of
 
−
the eigenfunction representations between different bodies
 
−
is required. This operator is called the coordinate transformation
 
−
matrix.
 
−
 
 
−
The cylindrical eigenfunction expansions will be introduced before we
 
−
derive a system of
 
−
equations for the coefficients of the scattered wavefields. Analogously to
 
−
[[kagemoto86]], we represent the scattered wavefield of
 
−
each body as an incoming wave upon all other bodies. The addition of
 
−
the ambient incident wave yields the complete incident potential and
 
−
with the use of diffraction transfer matrices which relate the
 
−
coefficients of the incident potential to those of the scattered
 
−
wavefield a system of equations for the unknown coefficients of the
 
−
scattered wavefields of all bodies is derived.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
===Eigenfunction expansion of the potential===
 
−
The equations of motion for the water are derived from the linearised
 
−
inviscid theory. Under the assumption of irrotational motion the
 
−
velocity vector field of the water can be written as the gradient
 
−
field of a scalar velocity potential <math>\Phi</math>. Assuming that the motion
 
−
is time-harmonic with the radian frequency <math>\omega</math> the
 
−
velocity potential can be expressed as the real part of a complex
 
−
quantity,
 
−
<center><math> (time)
 
−
\Phi(\mathbf{y},t) = \Re \{\phi (\mathbf{y}) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}\omega t} \}.
 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
To simplify notation, <math>\mathbf{y} = (x,y,z)</math> will always denote a point
+
with discrete coefficients <math>D_{n\nu}^j</math>. In these expansions, <math>I_\nu</math>
−
in the water, which is assumed infinitely deep, while <math>\mathbf{x}</math> will
+
and <math>K_\nu</math> denote the modified [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_function : Bessel functions]
−
always denote a point of the undisturbed water surface assumed at <math>z=0</math>.
+
of the first and second kind, respectively, both of order <math>\nu</math>.
  
−
The problem consists of <math>N</math> vertically non-overlapping bodies, denoted
+
Note that the term for <math>m =0</math> or
−
by <math>\Delta_j</math>, which are sufficiently far apart that there is no
+
<math>n=0</math> corresponds to the propagating modes while the  
−
intersection of the smallest cylinder which contains each body with
+
terms for <math>m\geq 1</math> (<math>n\geq 1</math>) correspond to the evanescent modes.
−
any other body. Each body is subject to an incident wavefield which is
 
−
incoming, responds to this wavefield and produces a scattered wave field which
 
−
is outgoing. Both the incident and scattered potential corresponding
 
−
to these wavefields can be represented in the cylindrical
 
−
eigenfunction expansion valid outside of the escribed cylinder of the
 
−
body. Let <math>(r_j,\theta_j,z)</math> be the local cylindrical coordinates of
 
−
the <math>j</math>th body, <math>\Delta_j</math>, <math>j \in \{1, \ldots , N\}</math>, and
 
−
<math>\alpha =\omega^2/g</math> where <math>g</math> is the acceleration due to gravity. Figure
 
−
(fig:floe_tri) shows these coordinate systems for two bodies.
 
  
−
The scattered potential of body <math>\Delta_j</math> can be expanded in
+
=Derivation of the system of equations=
−
cylindrical eigenfunctions,
 
−
<center><math> (basisrep_out)
 
−
\phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} A_{0 \nu}^j H_\nu^{(1)} (\alpha r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
\theta_j}
 
−
+ \int\limits_0^{\infty} \big( \cos \eta z + \frac{\alpha}{\eta}
 
−
\sin \eta z \big) \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} A_{\nu}^j (\eta) K_\nu (\eta r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
\theta_j} \mathrm{d}\eta,
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
where the coefficients <math>A_{0 \nu}^j</math> for the propagating modes are
 
−
discrete and the coefficients <math>A_{\nu}^j (\cdot)</math> for the decaying
 
−
modes are functions. <math>H_\nu^{(1)}</math> and <math>K_\nu</math> are the Hankel function
 
−
of the first kind and the modified Bessel function of the second kind
 
−
respectively, both of order <math>\nu</math> as defined in [[abr_ste]].
 
−
The incident potential upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can be expanded in
 
−
cylindrical eigenfunctions,
 
−
<center><math> (basisrep_in)
 
−
\phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\mu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} D_{0 \mu}^j J_\mu (\alpha r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
 
−
\theta_j}
 
−
+ \int\limits_0^{\infty} \big( \cos \eta z + \frac{\alpha}{\eta}
 
−
\sin \eta z \big) \sum_{\mu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} D_{\mu}^j (\eta) I_\mu (\eta r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
 
−
\theta_j} \mathrm{d}\eta,
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
where the coefficients <math>D_{0 \mu}^j</math> for the propagating modes are
 
−
discrete and the coefficients <math>D_{\mu}^j (\cdot)</math> for the decaying
 
−
modes are functions. <math>J_\mu</math> and <math>I_\mu</math> are the Bessel function and
 
−
the modified Bessel function respectively, both of the first kind and
 
−
order <math>\mu</math>. To simplify the notation, from now on <math>\psi(z,\eta)</math> will
 
−
denote the vertical eigenfunctions corresponding to the decaying modes,
 
−
<center><math>
 
−
\psi(z,\eta) = \cos \eta z + \alpha / \eta \, \sin \eta z.
 
−
</math></center>
 
  
−
===The interaction in water of infinite depth===
+
A system of equations for the unknown  
−
Following the ideas of [[kagemoto86]], a system of equations for the unknown
+
coefficients of the
−
coefficients and coefficient functions of the scattered wavefields
+
scattered wavefields of all bodies is developed. This system of
−
will be developed. This system of equations is based on transforming the
+
equations is based on transforming the  
 
scattered potential of <math>\Delta_j</math> into an incident potential upon
 
scattered potential of <math>\Delta_j</math> into an incident potential upon
 
<math>\Delta_l</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>). Doing this for all bodies simultaneously,
 
<math>\Delta_l</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>). Doing this for all bodies simultaneously,
 
and relating the incident and scattered potential for each body, a system
 
and relating the incident and scattered potential for each body, a system
−
of equations for the unknown coefficients will be developed.  
+
of equations for the unknown coefficients is developed.
 +
Making use of the periodicity of the geometry and of the ambient incident
 +
wave, this system of equations can then be simplified.
  
 
The scattered potential <math>\phi_j^{\mathrm{S}}</math> of body <math>\Delta_j</math> needs to be
 
The scattered potential <math>\phi_j^{\mathrm{S}}</math> of body <math>\Delta_j</math> needs to be
 
represented in terms of the incident potential <math>\phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}</math>
 
represented in terms of the incident potential <math>\phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}</math>
−
upon <math>\Delta_l</math>, <math>j \neq l</math>. From figure
+
upon <math>\Delta_l</math>, <math>j \neq l</math>. This can be accomplished by using
−
(fig:floe_tri) we can see that this can be accomplished by using
+
[[Graf's Addition Theorem]]
−
Graf's addition theorem for Bessel functions given in
+
<center><math>
−
\citet[eq. 9.1.79]{abr_ste},
+
K_\tau(k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\tau (\theta_j-\varphi_{jl})} =
−
<center><math> (transf)
+
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} K_{\tau + \nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \,
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix} (transf_h)
+
I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu (\pi - \theta_l + \varphi_{jl})}, \quad j \neq l,
−
H_\nu^{(1)}(\alpha r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu (\theta_j - \vartheta_{jl})} &=
 
−
\sum_{\mu = - \infty}^{\infty} H^{(1)}_{\nu + \mu} (\alpha R_{jl}) \,
 
−
J_\mu (\alpha r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu (\pi - \theta_l + \vartheta_{jl})},
 
−
\quad j \neq l,\\
 
−
(transf_k)
 
−
K_\nu(\eta r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu (\theta_j - \vartheta_{jl})} &= \sum_{\mu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} K_{\nu + \mu} (\eta R_{jl}) \, I_\mu (\eta r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
 
−
(\pi - \theta_l + \vartheta_{jl})}, \quad j \neq l,
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
which is valid provided that <math>r_l < R_{jl}</math>. This limitation
+
which is valid provided that <math>r_l < R_{jl}</math>. Here, <math>(R_{jl},\varphi_{jl})</math>  are the polar coordinates of the mean centre position of <math>\Delta_{l}</math> in the local coordinates of <math>\Delta_{j}</math>.
−
only requires that the escribed cylinder of each body <math>\Delta_l</math> does
+
 
−
not enclose any other origin <math>O_j</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>). However, the
+
The limitation <math>r_l < R_{jl}</math> only requires that the escribed cylinder of each body
 +
<math>\Delta_l</math> does not enclose any other origin <math>O_j</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>). However, the
 
expansion of the scattered and incident potential in cylindrical
 
expansion of the scattered and incident potential in cylindrical
 
eigenfunctions is only valid outside the escribed cylinder of each
 
eigenfunctions is only valid outside the escribed cylinder of each
Line 181: Line 107:
 
origin <math>O_j</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>) is superseded by the more rigorous
 
origin <math>O_j</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>) is superseded by the more rigorous
 
restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any
 
restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any
−
other body. Making use of the equations  (transf)
+
other body.  
−
the scattered potential of <math>\Delta_j</math> can be expressed in terms of the
 
−
incident potential upon <math>\Delta_l</math>,
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
\phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z) &=
 
−
\mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{0\nu}^j
 
−
\sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} H_{\nu - \mu}^{(1)} (\alpha R_{jl})
 
−
J_\mu (\alpha r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_l} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\nu-\mu)
 
−
\vartheta_{jl}}\\
 
−
& \quad + \int\limits_0^{\infty} \psi (z,\eta) \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} A_{\nu}^j (\eta) \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty}
 
−
(-1)^\mu K_{\nu-\mu} (\eta R_{jl}) I_\mu (\eta r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
 
−
\theta_l}  \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\nu-\mu) \vartheta_{jl}} \mathrm{d}\eta\\
 
−
&= \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} \Big[ \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} A_{0\nu}^j H_{\nu - \mu}^{(1)} (\alpha R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\i
 
−
(\nu-\mu) \vartheta_{jl}} \Big] J_\mu (\alpha r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_l}\\
 
−
& + \int\limits_0^{\infty} \psi (z,\eta) \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty}
 
−
\Big[ \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{\nu}^j (\eta) (-1)^\mu K_{\nu-\mu}
 
−
(\eta R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\nu-\mu)
 
−
\vartheta_{jl}} \Big] I_\mu (\eta r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_l} \mathrm{d}\eta.
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
The ambient incident wavefield <math>\phi^{\mathrm{In}}</math> can also be
 
−
expanded in the eigenfunctions corresponding to the incident wavefield upon
 
−
<math>\Delta_l</math>. A detailed illustration of how to accomplish this will be given
 
−
later. Let <math>D_{l0\mu}^{\mathrm{In}}</math> denote the coefficients of this
 
−
ambient incident wavefield corresponding to the propagating modes and
 
−
<math>D_{l\mu}^{\mathrm{In}} (\cdot)</math>  denote the coefficients functions
 
−
corresponding to the decaying modes (which are identically zero) of
 
−
the incoming eigenfunction expansion for <math>\Delta_l</math>. The total
 
−
incident wavefield upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can now be expressed as
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
&\phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) = \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) +
 
−
\sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq l}}^{N} \, \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}}
 
−
(r_l,\theta_l,z)\\
 
−
&= \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} \Big[
 
−
D_{l0\mu}^{\mathrm{In}} + \sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j
 
−
\neq l}}^{N} \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{0\nu}^j
 
−
H_{\nu-\mu}^{(1)} (\alpha R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\i
 
−
(\nu - \mu) \vartheta_{jl}} \Big] J_\mu (\alpha r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_l}\\
 
−
& + \int\limits_0^{\infty} \psi (z,\eta) \sum_{\mu =
 
−
-\infty}^{\infty} \Big[  D_{l\mu}^{\mathrm{In}}(\eta) +
 
−
\sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq  l}}^{N} \sum_{\nu =
 
−
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{\nu}^j (\eta) (-1)^\mu K_{\nu - \mu}  (\eta
 
−
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\nu - \mu) \vartheta_{jl}} \Big] I_\mu (\eta r_l)
 
−
\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_l} \mathrm{d}\eta.
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
The coefficients of the total incident potential upon <math>\Delta_l</math> are
 
−
therefore given by
 
−
<center><math> (inc_coeff)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
D_{0\mu}^l &= D_{l0\mu}^{\mathrm{In}} + \sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j
 
−
\neq l}}^{N} \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{0\nu}^j
 
−
H_{\nu-\mu}^{(1)} (\alpha R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\i
 
−
(\nu - \mu) \vartheta_{jl}},\\
 
−
D_{\mu}^l(\eta) &= D_{l\mu}^{\mathrm{In}}(\eta) +
 
−
\sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq  l}}^{N} \sum_{\nu =
 
−
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{\nu}^j (\eta) (-1)^\mu K_{\nu - \mu}  (\eta
 
−
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\nu - \mu) \vartheta_{jl}}.
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
  
−
In general, it is possible to relate the total incident and scattered
+
Making use of the eigenfunction expansion as well as [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential
−
partial waves for any body through the diffraction characteristics of
+
of <math>\Delta_j</math> can be expressed in terms of the
−
that body in isolation. There exist diffraction transfer operators
+
incident potential upon <math>\Delta_l</math> as
−
<math>B_l</math> that relate the coefficients of the incident and scattered
 
−
partial waves, such that
 
−
<center><math> (eq_B)
 
−
A_l = B_l (D_l), \quad l=1, \ldots, N,
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
where <math>A_l</math> are the scattered modes due to the incident modes <math>D_l</math>.
 
−
In the case of a countable number of modes, (i.e. when
 
−
the depth is finite), <math>B_l</math> is an infinite dimensional matrix. When
 
−
the modes are functions of a continuous variable (i.e. infinite
 
−
depth), <math>B_l</math> is the kernel of an integral operator.
 
−
For the propagating and the decaying modes respectively, the scattered
 
−
potential can be related by diffraction transfer operators acting in the
 
−
following ways,
 
−
<center><math> (diff_op)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
A_{0\nu}^l &= \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{l\nu\mu}^\mathrm{pp} D_{0\mu}^l
 
−
+ \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty}
 
−
B_{l\nu\mu}^\mathrm{pd} (\xi) D_{\mu}^l (\xi) \mathrm{d}\xi,\\
 
−
A_\nu^l (\eta) &= \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty}
 
−
B_{l\nu\mu}^\mathrm{dp} (\eta) D_{0\mu}^l + \int\limits_{0}^{\infty}
 
−
\sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{l\nu\mu}^\mathrm{dd} (\eta;\xi)
 
−
D_{\mu}^l (\xi) \mathrm{d}\xi.
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
The superscripts <math>\mathrm{p}</math> and <math>\mathrm{d}</math> are used to distinguish
 
−
between propagating and decaying modes, the first superscript denotes the kind
 
−
of scattered mode, the second one the kind of incident mode.
 
−
If the diffraction transfer operators are known (their calculation
 
−
will be discussed later), the substitution of
 
−
equations  (inc_coeff) into equations  (diff_op) give the
 
−
required equations to determine the coefficients and coefficient
 
−
functions of the scattered wavefields of all bodies,
 
−
<center><math> (eq_op)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
&\begin{aligned}
 
−
&A_{0n}^l = \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{ln\mu}^\mathrm{pp}
 
−
\Big[ D_{l0\mu}^{\mathrm{In}} + \sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j
 
−
\neq l}}^{N} \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{0\nu}^j
 
−
H_{\nu-\mu}^{(1)} (\alpha R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\i
 
−
(\nu - \mu) \vartheta_{jl}} \Big]\\
 
−
& \ + \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty}
 
−
B_{ln\mu}^\mathrm{pd} (\xi) \Big[D_{l\mu}^{\mathrm{In}}(\eta) +
 
−
\sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq  l}}^{N} \sum_{\nu =
 
−
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{\nu}^j (\eta) (-1)^\mu K_{\nu - \mu}  (\eta
 
−
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\nu - \mu) \vartheta_{jl}} \Big] \mathrm{d}\xi,
 
−
\end{aligned}\\
 
−
&\begin{aligned}
 
−
&A_n^l (\eta) = \sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty}
 
−
B_{ln\mu}^\mathrm{dp} (\eta) \Big[
 
−
D_{l0\mu}^{\mathrm{In}} + \sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j
 
−
\neq l}}^{N} \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{0\nu}^j
 
−
H_{\nu-\mu}^{(1)} (\alpha R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\i
 
−
(\nu - \mu) \vartheta_{jl}}\Big]\\
 
−
& \ + \int\limits_{0}^{\infty}
 
−
\sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{ln\mu}^\mathrm{dd} (\eta;\xi)
 
−
\Big[ D_{l\mu}^{\mathrm{In}}(\eta) +
 
−
\sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq  l}}^{N} \sum_{\nu =
 
−
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{\nu}^j (\eta) (-1)^\mu K_{\nu - \mu}  (\eta
 
−
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\nu - \mu) \vartheta_{jl}}\Big] \mathrm{d}\xi,
 
−
\end{aligned}
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
<math>n \in \mathds{Z},\, l = 1, \ldots, N</math>. It has to be noted that all
 
−
equations are coupled so that it is necessary to solve for all
 
−
scattered coefficients and coefficient functions simultaneously.
 
−
 
 
−
For numerical calculations, the infinite sums have to be truncated and
 
−
the integrals must be discretised. Implying a suitable truncation, the
 
−
four different diffraction transfer operators can be represented by
 
−
matrices which can be assembled in a big matrix <math>\mathbf{B}_l</math>,
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
−
\mathbf{B}_l = \left[
+
\phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z)
−
\begin{matrix}{cc} \mathbf{B}_l^{\mathrm{pp}} & \mathbf{B}_l^{\mathrm{pd}}\\
+
= \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\tau = -
−
\mathbf{B}_l^{\mathrm{dp}} & \mathbf{B}_l^{\mathrm{dd}}
+
\infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
−
\end{matrix} \right],
+
(-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m  R_{jl}) I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
−
</math></center>
+
\theta_l} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau-\nu) \varphi_{jl}}  
−
the infinite depth diffraction transfer matrix.
 
−
Truncating the coefficients accordingly, defining <math>{\bf a}^l</math> to be the
 
−
vector of the coefficients of the scattered potential of body
 
−
<math>\Delta_l</math>, <math>\mathbf{d}_l^{\mathrm{In}}</math> to be the vector of
 
−
coefficients of the ambient wavefield, and making use of a coordinate
 
−
transformation matrix <math>{\bf T}_{jl}</math> given by
 
−
<center><math> (T_elem_deep)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
({\bf T}_{jl})_{pq} &= H_{p-q}^{(1)}(\alpha R_{jl}) \, \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(p-q)
 
−
\vartheta_{jl}}\\
 
−
=for the propagating modes, and=
 
−
({\bf T}_{jl})_{pq} &= (-1)^{q} \, K_{p-q} (\eta R_{jl}) \, \mathrm{e}^{\i
 
−
(p-q) \vartheta_{jl}}
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
for the decaying modes, a linear system of equations
 
−
for the unknown coefficients follows from equations  (eq_op),
 
−
<center><math> (eq_B_inf)
 
−
{\bf a}_l = {\bf \hat{B}}_l \Big( {\bf d}_l^{\mathrm{In}} +
 
−
\sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq l}}^{N} \trans {\bf T}_{jl} \,
 
−
{\bf a}_j \Big), \quad  l=1, \ldots, N,
 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
where the left superscript <math>\mathrm{t}</math> indicates transposition.
 
−
The matrix <math>{\bf \hat{B}}_l</math> denotes the infinite depth diffraction
 
−
transfer matrix <math>{\bf B}_l</math> in which the elements associated with
 
−
decaying scattered modes have been multiplied with the appropriate
 
−
integration weights depending on the discretisation of the continuous variable.
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
\subsection{Calculation of the diffraction transfer matrix for bodies
 
−
of arbitrary geometry}
 
−
 
−
Before we can apply the interaction theory we require the diffraction
 
−
transfer matrices <math>\mathbf{B}_j</math> which relate the incident and the
 
−
scattered potential for a body <math>\Delta_j</math> in isolation.
 
−
The elements of the diffraction transfer matrix, <math>({\bf B}_j)_{pq}</math>,
 
−
are the coefficients of the
 
−
<math>p</math>th partial wave of the scattered potential due to a single
 
−
unit-amplitude incident wave of mode <math>q</math> upon <math>\Delta_j</math>.
 
−
 
−
While \citeauthor{kagemoto86}'s interaction theory was valid for
 
−
bodies of arbitrary shape, they did not explain how to actually obtain the
 
−
diffraction transfer matrices for bodies which did not have an axisymmetric
 
−
geometry. This step was performed by [[goo90]] who came up with an
 
−
explicit method to calculate the diffraction transfer matrices for bodies of
 
−
arbitrary geometry in the case of finite depth. Utilising a Green's
 
−
function they used the standard
 
−
method of transforming the single diffraction boundary-value problem
 
−
to an integral equation for the source strength distribution function
 
−
over the immersed surface of the body.
 
−
However, the representation of the scattered potential which
 
−
is obtained using this method is not automatically given in the
 
−
cylindrical eigenfunction
 
−
expansion. To obtain such cylindrical eigenfunction expansions of the
 
−
potential [[goo90]] used the representation of the free surface
 
−
finite depth Green's function given by [[black75]] and
 
−
[[fenton78]].  \citeauthor{black75} and
 
−
\citeauthor{fenton78}'s representation of the Green's function was based
 
−
on applying Graf's addition theorem to the eigenfunction
 
−
representation of the free surface finite depth Green's function given
 
−
by [[john2]]. Their representation allowed the scattered potential to be
 
−
represented in the eigenfunction expansion with the cylindrical
 
−
coordinate system fixed at the point of the water surface above the
 
−
mean centre position of the body.
 
−
 
−
It should be noted that, instead of using the source strength distribution
 
−
function, it is also possible to consider an integral equation for the
 
−
total potential and calculate the elements of the diffraction transfer
 
−
matrix from the solution of this integral equation.
 
−
An outline of this method for water of finite
 
−
depth is given by [[kashiwagi00]]. We will present
 
−
here a derivation of the diffraction transfer matrices for the case
 
−
infinite depth based on a solution
 
−
for the source strength distribution function. However,
 
−
an equivalent derivation would be possible based on the solution
 
−
for the total velocity potential.
 
−
 
−
To calculate the diffraction transfer matrix in infinite depth, we
 
−
require the representation of the infinite depth free surface Green's
 
−
function in cylindrical eigenfunctions,
 
−
<center><math> (green_inf)
 
−
G(r,\theta,z;s,\varphi,c) &= \frac{\mathrm{i}\alpha}{2} \,  \mathrm{e}^{\alpha (z+c)}
 
−
\sum_{\nu=-\infty}^{\infty} H_\nu^{(1)}(\alpha r) J_\nu(\alpha s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
(\theta - \varphi)}\\ &\quad + \frac{1}{\pi^2} \int\limits_0^{\infty}
 
−
\psi(z,\eta) \frac{\eta^2}{\eta^2+\alpha^2} \psi(c,\eta)
 
−
\sum_{\nu=-\infty}^{\infty} K_\nu(\eta r) I_\nu(\eta s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
(\theta - \varphi)} \mathrm{d}\eta,
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
<math>r > s</math>, given by [[malte03]].
 
−
 
−
We assume that we have represented the scattered potential in terms of
 
−
the source strength distribution <math>\varsigma^j</math> so that the scattered
 
−
potential can be written as
 
−
<center><math> (int_eq_1)
 
−
\phi_j^\mathrm{S}(\mathbf{y}) = \int\limits_{\Gamma_j} G
 
−
(\mathbf{y},\mathbf{\zeta}) \, \varsigma^j (\mathbf{\zeta})
 
−
\mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}, \quad \mathbf{y} \in D,
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
where <math>D</math> is the volume occupied by the water and <math>\Gamma_j</math> is the
 
−
immersed surface of body <math>\Delta_j</math>. The source strength distribution
 
−
function <math>\varsigma^j</math> can be found by solving an
 
−
integral equation. The integral equation is described in
 
−
[[Weh_Lait]] and numerical methods for its solution are outlined in
 
−
[[Sarp_Isa]].
 
−
Substituting the eigenfunction expansion of the Green's function
 
−
(green_inf) into  (int_eq_1), the scattered potential can
 
−
be written as
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
&\phi_j^\mathrm{S}(r_j,\theta_j,z) = \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} \bigg[ \frac{\mathrm{i}\alpha}{2}
 
−
\int\limits_{\Gamma_j} \mathrm{e}^{\alpha c} J_\nu(\alpha s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
\varphi} \varsigma^j(\mathbf{\zeta})
 
−
\mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta} \bigg] H_\nu^{(1)} (\alpha r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_j}\\
 
−
& \, + \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} \psi(z,\eta) \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty}  \bigg[ \frac{1}{\pi^2} \frac{\eta^2
 
−
}{\eta^2 + \alpha^2} \int\limits_{\Gamma_j} \psi(c,\eta) I_\nu(\eta s)
 
−
\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}\nu \varphi} \varsigma^j({\bf{\zeta}})
 
−
\mathrm{d}\sigma_{\bf{\zeta}} \bigg] K_\nu (\eta r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_j} \mathrm{d}\eta,
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
where
 
−
<math>\mathbf{\zeta}=(s,\varphi,c)</math> and <math>r>s</math>.
 
−
This restriction implies that the eigenfunction expansion is only valid
 
−
outside the escribed cylinder of the body.
 
−
 
−
The columns of the diffraction transfer matrix are the coefficients of
 
−
the eigenfunction expansion of the scattered wavefield due to the
 
−
different incident modes of unit-amplitude. The elements of the
 
−
diffraction transfer matrix of a body of arbitrary shape are therefore given by
 
−
<center><math> (B_elem)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
({\bf B}_j)_{pq} &= \frac{\mathrm{i}\alpha}{2} \int\limits_{\Gamma_j}
 
−
\mathrm{e}^{\alpha c} J_p(\alpha s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p \varphi} \varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta})
 
−
\mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}\\
 
−
=and= 
 
−
({\bf B}_j)_{pq} &= \frac{1}{\pi^2} \frac{\eta^2}{\eta^2 +
 
−
\alpha^2} \int\limits_{\Gamma_j} \psi(c,\eta) I_p(\eta s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p
 
−
\varphi} \varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta}) \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
for the propagating and the decaying modes respectively, where
 
−
<math>\varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta})</math> is the source strength distribution
 
−
due to an incident potential of mode <math>q</math> of the form
 
−
<center><math> (test_modes_inf)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
\phi_q^{\mathrm{I}}(s,\varphi,c) &=  \mathrm{e}^{\alpha c} H_q^{(1)} (\alpha
 
−
s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \varphi}\\
 
−
=for the propagating modes, and= 
 
−
\phi_q^{\mathrm{I}}(s,\varphi,c) &= \psi(c,\eta) K_q (\eta s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \varphi}
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
for the decaying modes.
 
−
 
−
===The diffraction transfer matrix of rotated bodies===
 
−
 
−
For a non-axisymmetric body, a rotation about the mean
 
−
centre position in the <math>(x,y)</math>-plane will result in a
 
−
different diffraction transfer matrix. We will show how the
 
−
diffraction transfer matrix of a body rotated by an angle <math>\beta</math> can
 
−
be easily calculated from the diffraction transfer matrix of the
 
−
non-rotated body. The rotation of the body influences the form of the
 
−
elements of the diffraction transfer matrices in two ways. Firstly, the
 
−
angular dependence in the integral over the immersed surface of the
 
−
body is altered and, secondly, the source strength distribution
 
−
function is different if the body is rotated. However, the source
 
−
strength distribution function of the rotated body can be obtained by
 
−
calculating the response of the non-rotated body due to rotated
 
−
incident potentials. It will be shown that the additional angular
 
−
dependence can be easily factored out of the elements of the
 
−
diffraction transfer matrix.
 
−
 
−
The additional angular dependence caused by the rotation of the
 
−
incident potential can be factored out of the normal derivative of the
 
−
incident potential such that
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
−
\frac{\partial \phi_{q\beta}^{\mathrm{I}}}{\partial n} =
+
= \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\nu =
−
\frac{\partial \phi_{q}^{\mathrm{I}}}{\partial n}
+
-\infty}^{\infty}  \Big[ \sum_{\tau = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j
−
\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \beta},
+
(-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu)
 +
\varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
where <math>\phi_{q\beta}^{\mathrm{I}}</math> is the rotated incident potential.
+
The ambient incident wavefield <math>\phi^{\mathrm{In}}</math> can also be
−
Since the integral equation for the determination of the source
+
expanded in the eigenfunctions corresponding to the incident wavefield upon
−
strength distribution function is linear, the source strength
+
<math>\Delta_l</math>. Let <math>\tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l}</math> denote the coefficients of this
−
distribution function due to the rotated incident potential is thus just
+
ambient incident wavefield in the incoming eigenfunction expansion for
−
given by
+
<math>\Delta_l</math> (cf. the example in [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]]).
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
−
\varsigma_{q\beta}^j = \varsigma_q^j \, \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \beta}.
+
\phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
 +
\tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l}  I_\nu (k_n
 +
r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}.  
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
This is also the source strength distribution function of the rotated
+
The total
−
body due to the standard incident modes.
+
incident wavefield upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can now be expressed as
−
 
 
−
The elements of the diffraction transfer matrix <math>\mathbf{B}_j</math> are
 
−
given by equations  (B_elem). Keeping in mind that the body is
 
−
rotated by the angle <math>\beta</math>, the elements of the diffraction transfer
 
−
matrix of the rotated body are given by
 
−
<center><math> (B_elem_rot)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
(\mathbf{B}_j^\beta)_{pq} &= \frac{\mathrm{i}\alpha}{2} \int\limits_{\Gamma_j}
 
−
\mathrm{e}^{\alpha c} J_p(\alpha s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p (\varphi+\beta)}
 
−
\varsigma_{q\beta}^j(\mathbf{\zeta}) \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta},\\
 
−
=and= 
 
−
(\mathbf{B}_j^\beta)_{pq} &= \frac{1}{\pi^2} \frac{\eta^2}{\eta^2 +
 
−
\alpha^2} \int\limits_{\Gamma_j} \psi(c,\eta) I_p(\eta s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p
 
−
(\varphi+\beta)} \varsigma_{q\beta}^j(\mathbf{\zeta}) \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta},
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
for the propagating and decaying modes respectively.
 
−
 
 
−
Thus the additional angular dependence caused by the rotation of
 
−
the body can be factored out of the elements of the diffraction
 
−
transfer matrix. The elements of the diffraction transfer matrix
 
−
corresponding to the body rotated by the angle <math>\beta</math>,
 
−
<math>\mathbf{B}_j^\beta</math>, are given by
 
−
<center><math> (B_rot)
 
−
(\mathbf{B}_j^\beta)_{pq} = (\mathbf{B}_j)_{pq} \, \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(q-p) \beta}.
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
As before, <math>(\mathbf{B})_{pq}</math> is understood to be the element of
 
−
<math>\mathbf{B}</math> which corresponds to the coefficient of the <math>p</math>th scattered
 
−
mode due to a unit-amplitude incident wave of mode <math>q</math>. Equation
 
−
(B_rot) applies to propagating and decaying modes likewise.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
\subsection{Representation of the ambient wavefield in the eigenfunction
 
−
representation}
 
−
In Cartesian coordinates centred at the origin, the ambient wavefield is
 
−
given by
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
−
\phi^{\mathrm{In}}(x,y,z) = A \frac{g}{\omega} \, \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\alpha (x
+
\phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) = \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) +
−
\cos \chi + y \sin \chi)+ \alpha z},
+
\sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \, \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}}
 +
(r_l,\theta_l,z)
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
where <math>A</math> is the amplitude (in displacement) and <math>\chi</math> is the
+
This allows us to write
−
angle between the <math>x</math>-axis and the direction in which the wavefield travels.
 
−
The interaction theory requires that the ambient wavefield, which is
 
−
incident upon
 
−
all bodies, is represented in the eigenfunction expansion of an
 
−
incoming wave in the local coordinates of the body. The ambient wave
 
−
can be represented in an eigenfunction expansion centred at the origin
 
−
as
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
−
\phi^{\mathrm{In}}(x,y,z) = A \frac{g}{\omega} \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z}
+
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z)
−
\sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu (\pi/2 - \theta + \chi)}
+
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^l I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}
−
J_\mu(\alpha r)
 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
\cite[p. 169]{linton01}.
 
−
Since the local coordinates of the bodies are centred at their mean
 
−
centre positions <math>O_l = (O_x^l,O_y^l)</math>, a phase factor has to be defined
 
−
which accounts for the position from the origin. Including this phase
 
−
factor the ambient wavefield at the <math>l</math>th body is given
 
−
by
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
−
\phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) = A \frac{g}{\omega} \, e^{\mathrm{i}\alpha (O_x^l
+
= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
−
\cos \chi + O_x^l \sin \chi)} \, \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z}
+
\Big[  \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
−
\sum_{\mu = -\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu (\pi/2 - \chi)}
+
\sum_{j=1,j \neq  l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
−
J_\mu(\alpha r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_l}.
+
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu}  (k_n
 +
R_{jl})  \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_n
 +
r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}.  
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
 
+
It therefore follows that
−
===Solving the resulting system of equations===
 
−
After the coefficient vector of the ambient incident wavefield, the
 
−
diffraction transfer matrices and the coordinate
 
−
transformation matrices have been calculated, the system of
 
−
equations  (eq_B_inf),
 
−
has to be solved. This system can be represented by the following
 
−
matrix equation,
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
−
\left[ \begin{matrix}{c}
+
D_{n\nu}^l  =  
−
{\bf a}_1\\ {\bf a}_2\\ \\ \vdots \\ \\ {\bf a}_N
+
  \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
−
\end{matrix} \right]
+
\sum_{j=1,j \neq  l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
−
= \left[ \begin{matrix}{c}
+
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n
−
\hat{{\bf B}}_1 {\bf d}_1^\mathrm{In}\\ \hat{{\bf B}}_2 {\bf
+
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}}  
−
d}_2^\mathrm{In}\\ \\ \vdots \\ \\ \hat{{\bf B}}_N {\bf d}_N^\mathrm{In}
 
−
\end{matrix} \right]+
 
−
\left[ \begin{matrix}{ccccc}
 
−
\mathbf{0} & \hat{{\bf B}}_1 \trans {\bf T}_{21} & \hat{{\bf B}}_1
 
−
\trans {\bf T}_{31} & \dots & \hat{{\bf B}}_1 \trans {\bf T}_{N1}\\
 
−
\hat{{\bf B}}_2 \trans {\bf T}_{12} & \mathbf{0} & \hat{{\bf B}}_2
 
−
\trans {\bf T}_{32} & \dots & \hat{{\bf B}}_2 \trans {\bf T}_{N2}\\
 
−
& & \mathbf{0} & &\\
 
−
\vdots & & & \ddots & \vdots\\
 
−
& & & & \\
 
−
\hat{{\bf B}}_N \trans {\bf T}_{1N} & & \dots &  
 
−
& \mathbf{0}
 
−
\end{matrix} \right]
 
−
\left[ \begin{matrix}{c}
 
−
{\bf a}_1\\ {\bf a}_2\\ \\ \vdots \\ \\ {\bf a}_N
 
−
\end{matrix} \right],
 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
where <math>\mathbf{0}</math> denotes the zero-matrix which is of the same
 
−
dimension as <math>\hat{{\bf B}}_j</math>, say <math>n</math>. This matrix equation can be
 
−
easily transformed into a classical <math>(N \, n)</math>-dimensional linear system of
 
−
equations.
 
  
−
==Finite Depth Interaction Theory==
+
= Final Equations =
  
−
We will compare the performance of the infinite depth interaction theory
+
The scattered and incident potential of each body <math>\Delta_l</math> can be related by the
−
with the equivalent theory for finite
+
[[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]] acting in the following way,
−
depth. As we have stated previously, the finite depth theory was
+
<center><math>
−
developed by [[kagemoto86]] and extended to bodies of arbitrary
+
A_{m \mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{m n
−
geometry by [[goo90]]. We will briefly present this theory in
+
\mu \nu}^l D_{n\nu}^l.
−
our notation and the comparisons will be made in a later section.
 
−
 
 
−
In water of constant finite depth <math>d</math>, the scattered potential of a body
 
−
<math>\Delta_j</math> can be expanded in cylindrical eigenfunctions,
 
−
<center><math> (basisrep_out_d)
 
−
\phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) &= \frac{\cosh k(z+d)}{\cosh kd}
 
−
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{0 \nu}^j H_\nu^{(1)} (k r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
\theta_j}\\
 
−
&\quad + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos k_m (z+d)}{\cos kd} \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} A_{m \nu}^j K_\nu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
\theta_j},
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
with discrete coefficients <math>A_{m \nu}^j</math>. The positive wavenumber <math>k</math>
 
−
is related to <math>\alpha</math> by the dispersion relation
 
−
<center><math> (eq_k)
 
−
\alpha = k \tanh k d,
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
and the values of <math>k_m</math>, <math>m>0</math>, are given as positive real roots of
 
−
the dispersion relation
 
−
<center><math> (eq_k_m)
 
−
\alpha + k_m \tan k_m d = 0.
 
 
</math></center>  
 
</math></center>  
−
The incident potential upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can be also be expanded in
 
−
cylindrical eigenfunctions,
 
−
<center><math> (basisrep_in_d)
 
−
\phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) &= \frac{\cosh k(z+d)}{\cosh kd}
 
−
\sum_{\mu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{0 \mu}^j J_\mu (k r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
 
−
\theta_j}\\
 
−
& \quad + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos k_m (z+d)}{\cos kd} \sum_{\mu = -
 
−
\infty}^{\infty} D_{m\mu}^j I_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
 
−
\theta_j},
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
with discrete coefficients <math>D_{m\mu}^j</math>. A system of equations for the
 
−
coefficients of the scattered wavefields for the bodies are derived
 
−
in an analogous way to the infinite depth case. The derivation is
 
−
simpler because all the coefficients are discrete and the
 
−
diffraction transfer operator can be represented by an
 
−
infinite dimensional matrix.
 
−
Truncating the infinite dimensional matrix as well as the
 
−
coefficient vectors appropriately, the resulting system of
 
−
equations is given by 
 
−
<center><math>
 
−
{\bf a}_l = {\bf B}_l \Big( {\bf d}_l^\mathrm{In} +
 
−
\sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq l}}^{N} \trans {\bf T}_{jl} \,
 
−
{\bf a}_j \Big), \quad  l=1, \ldots, N,
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
where <math>{\bf a}_l</math> is the coefficient vector of the scattered
 
−
wave, <math>{\bf d}_l^\mathrm{In}</math> is the coefficient vector of the
 
−
ambient incident wave, <math>{\bf B}_l</math> is the diffraction transfer
 
−
matrix of <math>\Delta_l</math> and <math>{\bf T}_{jl}</math> is the coordinate transformation
 
−
matrix analogous to  (T_elem_deep).
 
  
−
The calculation of the diffraction transfer matrices is
+
The substitution of this into the equation for relating
−
also similar to the infinite depth case. The finite depth
+
the coefficients <math>D_{n\nu}^l</math> and
−
Green's function
+
<math>A_{m \mu}^l</math>gives the
−
<center><math> (green_d)
+
required equations to determine the coefficients of the scattered
−
&G(r,\theta,z;s,\varphi,c)\\ &= \frac{\i}{2} \,
+
wavefields of all bodies,  
−
\frac{\alpha^2-k^2}{d(\alpha^2-k^2)-\alpha}\, \cosh k(z+d) \cosh k(c+d)
 
−
\sum_{\nu=-\infty}^{\infty} H_\nu^{(1)}(k r) J_\nu(k s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
(\theta - \varphi)}\\ 
 
−
& \quad + \frac{1}{\pi} \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}
 
−
\frac{k_m^2+\alpha^2}{d(k_m^2+\alpha^2)-\alpha}\, \cos k_m(z+d) \cos
 
−
k_m(c+d) \sum_{\nu=-\infty}^{\infty} K_\nu(k_m r) I_\nu(k_m s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
(\theta - \varphi)},
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
given by [[black75]] and [[fenton78]], needs to be used instead
 
−
of the infinite depth Green's function  (green_inf).
 
−
The elements of <math>{\bf B}_j</math> are therefore given by
 
−
<center><math> (B_elem_d)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
({\bf B}_j)_{pq} &= \frac{\i}{2} \,
 
−
\frac{(\alpha^2-k^2)\cosh^2 kd}{d(\alpha^2-k^2)-\alpha} \int\limits_{\Gamma_j}
 
−
\cosh k(c+d) J_p(\alpha s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p \varphi} \varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta})
 
−
\mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}\\
 
−
=and= 
 
−
({\bf B}_j)_{pq} &= \frac{1}{\pi}
 
−
\frac{(k_m^2+\alpha^2)\cos^2 k_md}{d(k_m^2+\alpha^2)-\alpha}
 
−
\int\limits_{\Gamma_j} \cos k_m(c+d) I_p(\eta s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p
 
−
\varphi} \varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta}) \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
for the propagating and the decaying modes respectively, where
 
−
<math>\varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta})</math> is the source strength distribution
 
−
due to an incident potential of mode <math>q</math> of the form
 
−
<center><math> (test_modes_d)
 
−
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
−
\phi_q^{\mathrm{I}}(s,\varphi,c) &=  \frac{\cosh k_m(c+d)}{\cosh kd}
 
−
H_q^{(1)} (k s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \varphi}\\
 
−
=for the propagating modes, and= 
 
−
\phi_q^{\mathrm{I}}(s,\varphi,c) &= \frac{\cos k_m(c+d)}{\cos kd} K_q
 
−
(k_m s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \varphi}
 
−
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
for the decaying modes.
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
==Numerical Results==
 
−
 
 
−
In this section we will present some calculations using the interaction
 
−
theory in finite and infinite depth and the full
 
−
diffraction method in finite and infinite depth.
 
−
These will be based on calculations for ice floes. We begin with some
 
−
convergence tests which aim to compare the various methods. It needs
 
−
to be noted that this comparison is only of numerical nature since the
 
−
interactions methods as well as the full diffraction calculations
 
−
are exact in an analytical sense. However, numerical calculations
 
−
require truncations which affect the different methods in different
 
−
ways. Especially the dependence on these truncations will be investigated.
 
−
 
 
−
===Convergence Test===
 
−
We will present some convergence tests that aim to compare the
 
−
performance of the interaction theory with the full diffraction
 
−
calculations and to compare the
 
−
performance of the finite and infinite depth interaction methods in deep water.
 
−
The comparisons will be conducted for the case of two square ice floes
 
−
in three different arrangements.
 
−
In the full diffraction calculation the ice floes
 
−
are discretised in <math>24 \times 24 = 576</math> elements. For the full diffraction
 
−
calculation the resulting linear system of equations to be solved is
 
−
therefore 1152. As will be seen, once the diffraction
 
−
transfer matrix has been calculated (and saved), the dimension of the
 
−
linear system of equations to be solved in the interaction method is
 
−
considerably smaller. It is given by twice the dimension of the
 
−
diffraction transfer matrix. The most challenging situation for the
 
−
interaction theory is when the bodies are close together. For this
 
−
reason we choose the distance such that the escribed circles
 
−
of the two ice floes just overlap. It must be recalled that the
 
−
interaction theory is valid as long as the escribed cylinder of a body
 
−
does not intersect with any other body.
 
−
 
 
−
Both ice floes have non-dimensionalised
 
−
stiffness <math>\beta = 0.02</math>, mass <math>\gamma = 0.02</math> and Poisson's ratio
 
−
is chosen as <math>\nu=0.3333</math>. The wavelength of
 
−
the ambient incident wave is <math>\lambda = 2</math>. Each ice floe has
 
−
side length 2. The ambient
 
−
wavefield is of unit amplitude and propagates in the <math>x</math>-direction.
 
−
Three different arrangements are chosen to compare the results of the
 
−
finite depth interaction method in deep water and the infinite depth
 
−
interaction method with the corresponding full diffraction
 
−
calculations. In the first arrangement the second ice floe is located
 
−
behind the first, in the second arrangement it is located
 
−
beside, and the third arrangement it is both
 
−
beside and behind. The exact positions of the ice floes
 
−
are given in table (tab:pos).
 
−
 
 
−
\begin{table}
 
−
\begin{center}
 
−
\begin{tabular}{@{}ccc@{}}
 
−
arrangement & <math>O_1</math> & <math>O_2</math>\<center><math>3pt]
 
−
1 & <math>(-1.4,0)</math> & <math>(1.4,0)</math>\\
 
−
2 & <math>(0,-1.4)</math> & <math>(0,1.4)</math>\\
 
−
3 & <math>(-1.4,-0.6)</math> & <math>(1.4,0.6)</math>
 
−
\end{tabular}
 
−
\caption{Positions of the ice floes in the different arrangements.} (tab:pos)
 
−
\end{center}
 
−
\end{table}
 
−
 
 
−
Figure (fig:tsf) shows the
 
−
solutions corresponding to the three arrangements in the case of water
 
−
of infinite depth. To illustrate the effect on the water in the
 
−
vicinity of the ice floes, the water displacement is also shown.
 
−
It is interesting
 
−
to note that the ice floe in front is barely influenced by the
 
−
floe behind while the motion of the floe behind is quite
 
−
different from its motion in the absence of the floe in front.
 
−
 
 
−
\begin{figure}
 
−
\begin{center}
 
−
 
 
−
\includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x0_y28_v5_b02_chi2}\<center><math>0.4cm]
 
−
\includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x0_y28_v5_b02_chi0}\<center><math>0.4cm]
 
−
\includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x12_y28_v5_b02_chi2}
 
−
 
 
−
\end{center}
 
−
\caption{Surface displacement of the ice floes
 
−
and the water in their vicinity,\newline arrangements 1, 2 and 3.} (fig:tsf)
 
−
\end{figure}
 
−
 
 
−
To compare the results, a measure of
 
−
the error from the full diffraction calculation is used. We calculate
 
−
the full diffraction solution with a sufficient number of points
 
−
so that we may use it to approximate the exact solution.
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
−
E_2 = \left( \, \int\limits_{\Delta}
+
A_{m\mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}
−
\big| w_{i}(\mathbf{x})-w_{f}(\mathbf{x}) \big|^2 \mathrm{d}\mathbf{x} \,
+
\sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{mn\mu\nu}^l
−
\right)^{1/2},
+
\Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
 +
\sum_{j=1,j \neq  l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
 +
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu}  (k_n
 +
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau -\nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big],  
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
−
where <math>w_{i}</math> and <math>w_{f}</math> are the solutions of the
+
<math>m \in \mathbb{N}</math>, <math>\mu \in \mathbb{Z}</math>, <math>l=1,\dots,N</math>.
−
interaction method and the corresponding full diffraction calculation
 
−
respectively. It would also be possible to compare other errors, the
 
−
maximum difference of the solutions for example, but the results are
 
−
very similar.
 
−
 
 
−
It is worth noting that the finite depth interaction method
 
−
only converges up to a certain depth if used with the
 
−
eigenfunction expansion of the finite depth Green's function  (green_d).
 
−
This is because of the factor
 
−
<math>\alpha^2-k^2</math> in the term of propagating modes of the Green's
 
−
function. The Green's function can
 
−
be rewritten by making use of the dispersion relation  (eq_k)
 
−
\cite[as suggested by][p. 26, for example]{linton01}
 
−
and the depth restriction of the finite depth interaction method for
 
−
bodies of arbitrary geometry can be circumvented.
 
−
 
 
−
The truncation parameters for the interaction methods will
 
−
now be considered for both finite and infinite depth.
 
−
The number of propagating modes and angular decaying
 
−
components are free parameters in both methods. In
 
−
finite depth, the number of decaying roots of the dispersion relation
 
−
needs to be chosen while in infinite depth the discretisation of
 
−
a continuous variable must be selected.
 
−
In the infinite depth case we are free to choose the number of
 
−
points as well as the points themselves. In water of finite depth, the depth
 
−
can also be considered a free parameter as long as it is chosen large
 
−
enough to account for deep water.
 
−
 
 
−
Truncating the infinite sums in the eigenfunction expansion of the
 
−
outgoing water velocity potential for infinite depth with
 
−
truncation parameters <math>T_H</math> and <math>T_K</math> and discretising the integration
 
−
by defining a set of nodes, </math>0\leq\eta_1 < \ldots < \eta_m < \ldots <
 
−
\eta_{_{T_R}}<math>, with weights </math>h_m<math>, the potential for infinite depth
 
−
can be approximated by
 
−
<center><math>
 
−
\phi (r,\theta,z) &=  \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
T_H}^{T_H} A_{0\nu} H_\nu^{(1)} (\alpha r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
−
\theta}\\
 
−
&\quad + \sum_{m=1}^{T_R} h_m \, \psi (z,\eta_m) \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
T_K}^{T_K} A_{\nu} (\eta_m) K_\nu (\eta_m r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}.
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
In the following, the integration weights are chosen to be </math>h_m =
 
−
1/2\,(\eta_{m+1}-\eta_{m-1})<math>, </math>m=2, \ldots, T_R-1<math> and </math>h_1 =
 
−
\eta_2-\eta_1<math> as well as </math>h_{_{T_R}} =
 
−
\eta_{_{T_R}}-\eta_{_{T_R-1}}<math>, which corresponds to the mid-point
 
−
quadrature rule.
 
−
Different quadrature rules such as Gaussian quadrature
 
−
could be considered. Although in general this would lead to better
 
−
results, the mid-point rule allows a clever
 
−
choice of the discretisation points so that the convergence with
 
−
Gaussian quadrature is no better.
 
−
In finite depth, the analogous truncation leads to
 
−
<center><math>
 
−
\phi (r,\theta,z) &= \frac{\cosh k (z+d)}{\cosh kd} \sum_{\nu = -
 
−
T_H}^{T_H} A_{0\nu} H_\nu^{(1)} (k r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}\\
 
−
& \quad + \sum_{m = 1}^{T_R} \frac{\cos k_m(z+d)}{\cos k_m d}
 
−
\sum_{\nu = - T_K}^{T_K} A_{m\nu} K_\nu (k_m r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}.
 
−
</math></center>
 
−
In both cases, the dimension of the diffraction transfer matrix,
 
−
<math>\mathbf{B}</math>, is given by <math>2 \, T_H+1+T_R \, (2 \, T_K+1)</math>.
 
−
 
 
−
Since the choice of the number of propagating
 
−
modes and angular decaying components affects the finite and
 
−
infinite depth methods in similar ways, the dependence on these
 
−
parameters will not be further presented. Thorough convergence tests
 
−
have shown that in the settings investigated here, it is sufficient to
 
−
choose <math>T_H</math> to be 11 and <math>T_K</math> to be 5. Further increasing these
 
−
parameter values does not result in smaller errors (as compared
 
−
to the full diffraction calculation with 576 elements per floe).
 
−
We will now compare the convergence of the infinite depth and
 
−
the finite depth methods if <math>T_H</math> and <math>T_K</math> are
 
−
fixed (with the previously mentioned values) and <math>T_R</math> is varied. To be able to
 
−
compare the results, the discretisation of the continuous variable
 
−
will always be the same for fixed <math>T_R</math> and these are
 
−
shown in table (tab:discr).
 
−
It should be noted that if only one node is used the integration
 
−
weight is chosen to be 1.
 
−
 
 
−
\begin{table}
 
−
\begin{center}
 
−
\begin{tabular}{@{}cl@{}}
 
−
<math>T_R</math> & discretisation of <math>\eta</math>\<center><math>3pt]
 
−
1 & \{ 2.1 \}\\
 
−
2 & \{ 1.2, 2.7 \}\\
 
−
3 & \{ 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 \}\\
 
−
4 & \{ 0.4, 1.4, 2.2, 3.2 \}\\
 
−
5 & \{ 0.2, 1.0, 1.8, 3.0, 4.6 \}
 
−
\end{tabular}
 
−
\caption{The different discretisations used in the convergence tests.} (tab:discr)
 
−
\end{center}
 
−
\end{table}
 
−
 
−
Figures (fig:behind), (fig:beside) and (fig:shifted) show the convergence for arrangement 1, arrangement 2 and arrangement 3, respectively, for
 
−
the infinite depth method and the finite depth method with depth 2
 
−
(plot (a)) and depth 4 (plot (b)).
 
−
Since the ice floes are located beside each other
 
−
in arrangement 2 the average errors are the same for both floes.
 
−
As can be seen from figures (fig:behind), (fig:beside) and
 
−
(fig:shifted) the convergence of the infinite depth method
 
−
is similar to that of the finite depth method. Used with depth 2, the
 
−
convergence of the finite depth method is generally better than that
 
−
of the infinite depth method while used with depth 4, the infinite depth
 
−
method achieves the better results. Tests with other depths show that
 
−
the performance of the finite depth method decreases with increasing
 
−
water depth as expected. In general, since the wavelength is 2, a depth
 
−
of <math>d=2</math> should approximate infinite depth and hence there is no
 
−
advantage to using the infinite depth theory. However, as mentioned
 
−
previously, for certain situations such as ice floes it is not necessarily
 
−
true that <math>d=2</math> will approximate infinite depth. 
 
−
 
 
−
\begin{figure}
 
−
\begin{center}
 
−
\begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}} 
 
−
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{behind_d2}&&
 
−
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{behind_d4}
 
−
\end{tabular}
 
−
\caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
 
−
arrangement 1.} (fig:behind)
 
−
\end{center}
 
−
\end{figure}
 
−
 
 
−
\begin{figure}
 
−
\begin{center}
 
−
\begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}} 
 
−
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{beside_d2}&&
 
−
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{beside_d4}
 
−
\end{tabular}
 
−
\caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
 
−
arrangement 2.} (fig:beside)
 
−
\end{center}
 
−
\end{figure}
 
−
 
 
−
\begin{figure}
 
−
\begin{center}
 
−
\begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}} 
 
−
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{shifted_d2}&&
 
−
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{shifted_d4}
 
−
\end{tabular}
 
−
\caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
 
−
arrangement 3.} (fig:shifted)
 
−
\end{center}
 
−
\end{figure}
 
−
 
 
−
===Multiple ice floe results===
 
−
We will now present results for multiple ice floes of different
 
−
geometries and in different arrangements on water of infinite depth.
 
−
We choose the floe arrangements arbitrarily, since there are
 
−
no known special ice floe arrangements, such as those that give
 
−
rise to resonances in the infinite limit.
 
−
In all plots, the wavelength <math>\lambda</math> has been chosen to
 
−
be <math>2</math>, the stiffness <math>\beta</math> and the mass <math>\gamma</math> of the ice
 
−
floes to be 0.02 and Poisson's ratio <math>\nu</math> is <math>0.3333</math>. The ambient
 
−
wavefield of amplitude 1 propagates in
 
−
the positive direction of the <math>x</math>-axis, thus it travels from left to
 
−
right in the plots. 
 
−
 
 
−
Figure (fig:int_arb) shows the
 
−
displacements of multiple interacting ice floes of different shapes and
 
−
in different arrangements. Since square elements have been used to
 
−
represent the floes, non-rectangular geometries are approximated.
 
−
All ice floes have an area of 4 and the escribing circles do not
 
−
intersect with any of the other ice floes.
 
−
The plots show the displacement of the ice floes at time <math>t=0</math>.
 
−
 
 
−
\begin{figure}
 
−
\begin{center}
 
−
\begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.03\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}}
 
−
\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_tr_tr_tr_tr_in} &&
 
−
\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_tr_tr_tr_tr_out}\<center><math>0.2cm]
 
−
\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_rh_rh_rh} &&
 
−
\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_sq_sq_sq_sq_sq}\\
 
−
\end{tabular}
 
−
\end{center}
 
−
\caption{Surface displacement of interacting ice floes of different geometries.} (fig:int_arb)
 
−
\end{figure}
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
==Summary==
 
−
The finite depth interaction theory developed by
 
−
[[kagemoto86]] has been extended to water of infinite
 
−
depth. Furthermore, using the eigenfunction
 
−
expansion of the infinite depth free surface Green's function we have
 
−
been able to calculate the diffraction transfer matrices for bodies of
 
−
arbitrary geometry. We also showed how the diffraction transfer
 
−
matrices can be calculated efficiently for different orientations of
 
−
the body.
 
−
 
 
−
The convergence of the infinite depth interaction method is similar to
 
−
that of the finite depth method. Generally, it can be said that the
 
−
greater the water depth in the finite depth method the poorer its
 
−
performance. Since bodies in the water can change the water depth
 
−
which is required to allow the water to be approximated as infinitely
 
−
deep (ice floes for example) it is recommendable to use the infinite
 
−
depth method if the water depth may be considered
 
−
infinite. Furthermore, the infinite depth method requires the infinite
 
−
depth single diffraction solutions which are easier to
 
−
compute than the finite depth solutions.
 
−
It is also possible that the
 
−
convergence of the infinite depth method may be further improved
 
−
by a novel to optimisation of the discretisation of the continuous variable.</math>
 

Latest revision as of 10:24, 2 May 2010

Introduction

This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a Wide Spacing Approximation). The theory uses the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion and Graf's Addition Theorem to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated Diffraction Transfer Matrix. Interaction Theory for Cylinders presents a simplified version for cylinders.

The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using Graf's Addition Theorem, the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordinates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion associated with its local coordinates. Using the Diffraction Transfer Matrix, which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained.

The theory is described in Kagemoto and Yue 1986 and in Peter and Meylan 2004.

The derivation of the theory in Infinite Depth is also presented, see Kagemoto and Yue Interaction Theory for Infinite Depth.

Equations of Motion

The problem consists of [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] bodies [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] with immersed body surface [math]\displaystyle{ \Gamma_j }[/math]. Each body is subject to the Standard Linear Wave Scattering Problem and the particluar equations of motion for each body (e.g. rigid, or freely floating) can be different for each body. It is a Frequency Domain Problem with frequency [math]\displaystyle{ \omega }[/math]. The solution is exact, up to the restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any other body. To simplify notation, [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{y} = (x,y,z) }[/math] always denotes a point in the water, which is assumed to be of Finite Depth [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math], while [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{x} }[/math] always denotes a point of the undisturbed water surface assumed at [math]\displaystyle{ z=0 }[/math].

The equations are the following

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \Delta\phi &=0, &-h\lt z\lt 0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \Omega \\ \partial_z\phi &= 0, &z=-h, \\ \partial_z \phi &= \alpha \phi, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \end{align} }[/math]


(note that the last expression can be obtained from combining the expressions:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \partial_z \phi &= -\mathrm{i} \omega \zeta, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \\ \mathrm{i} \omega \phi &= g\zeta, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \end{align} }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha = \omega^2/g \, }[/math])

[math]\displaystyle{ \partial_n\phi = \mathcal{L}\phi, \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega_B, }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{L} }[/math] is a linear operator which relates the normal and potential on the body surface through the physics of the body.

The Sommerfeld Radiation Condition is also imposed.

Eigenfunction expansion of the potential

Each body is subject to an incident potential and moves in response to this incident potential to produce a scattered potential. Each of these is expanded using the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion The scattered potential of a body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be expressed as

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} f_m(z) \sum_{\mu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m \mu}^j K_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_j}, }[/math]

with discrete coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ A_{m \mu}^j }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ (r_j,\theta_j,z) }[/math] are cylindrical polar coordinates centered at each body

[math]\displaystyle{ f_m(z) = \frac{\cos k_m (z+h)}{\cos k_m h}. }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ k_m }[/math] are found from [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] by the Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface

[math]\displaystyle{ \alpha + k_m \tan k_m h = 0\,. }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ k_0 }[/math] is the imaginary root with negative imaginary part and [math]\displaystyle{ k_m }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ m\gt 0 }[/math], are given the positive real roots ordered with increasing size.

The incident potential upon body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be also be expanded in regular cylindrical eigenfunctions,

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^j I_\nu (k_n r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_j}, }[/math]

with discrete coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ D_{n\nu}^j }[/math]. In these expansions, [math]\displaystyle{ I_\nu }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ K_\nu }[/math] denote the modified : Bessel functions of the first and second kind, respectively, both of order [math]\displaystyle{ \nu }[/math].

Note that the term for [math]\displaystyle{ m =0 }[/math] or [math]\displaystyle{ n=0 }[/math] corresponds to the propagating modes while the terms for [math]\displaystyle{ m\geq 1 }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ n\geq 1 }[/math]) correspond to the evanescent modes.

Derivation of the system of equations

A system of equations for the unknown coefficients of the scattered wavefields of all bodies is developed. This system of equations is based on transforming the scattered potential of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] into an incident potential upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]). Doing this for all bodies simultaneously, and relating the incident and scattered potential for each body, a system of equations for the unknown coefficients is developed. Making use of the periodicity of the geometry and of the ambient incident wave, this system of equations can then be simplified.

The scattered potential [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} }[/math] of body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] needs to be represented in terms of the incident potential [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_l^{\mathrm{I}} }[/math] upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]. This can be accomplished by using Graf's Addition Theorem

[math]\displaystyle{ K_\tau(k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\tau (\theta_j-\varphi_{jl})} = \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} K_{\tau + \nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \, I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu (\pi - \theta_l + \varphi_{jl})}, \quad j \neq l, }[/math]

which is valid provided that [math]\displaystyle{ r_l \lt R_{jl} }[/math]. Here, [math]\displaystyle{ (R_{jl},\varphi_{jl}) }[/math] are the polar coordinates of the mean centre position of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_{l} }[/math] in the local coordinates of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_{j} }[/math].

The limitation [math]\displaystyle{ r_l \lt R_{jl} }[/math] only requires that the escribed cylinder of each body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] does not enclose any other origin [math]\displaystyle{ O_j }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]). However, the expansion of the scattered and incident potential in cylindrical eigenfunctions is only valid outside the escribed cylinder of each body. Therefore the condition that the escribed cylinder of each body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] does not enclose any other origin [math]\displaystyle{ O_j }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]) is superseded by the more rigorous restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any other body.

Making use of the eigenfunction expansion as well as Graf's Addition Theorem, the scattered potential of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be expressed in terms of the incident potential upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] as

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z) = \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\tau = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} (-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau-\nu) \varphi_{jl}} }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ = \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} \Big[ \sum_{\tau = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. }[/math]

The ambient incident wavefield [math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{In}} }[/math] can also be expanded in the eigenfunctions corresponding to the incident wavefield upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math]. Let [math]\displaystyle{ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} }[/math] denote the coefficients of this ambient incident wavefield in the incoming eigenfunction expansion for [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] (cf. the example in Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion).

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. }[/math]

The total incident wavefield upon body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can now be expressed as

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) = \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) + \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \, \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z) }[/math]

This allows us to write

[math]\displaystyle{ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^l I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l} }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ = \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} \Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. }[/math]

It therefore follows that

[math]\displaystyle{ D_{n\nu}^l = \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} }[/math]

Final Equations

The scattered and incident potential of each body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] can be related by the Diffraction Transfer Matrix acting in the following way,

[math]\displaystyle{ A_{m \mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{m n \mu \nu}^l D_{n\nu}^l. }[/math]

The substitution of this into the equation for relating the coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ D_{n\nu}^l }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ A_{m \mu}^l }[/math]gives the required equations to determine the coefficients of the scattered wavefields of all bodies,

[math]\displaystyle{ A_{m\mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{mn\mu\nu}^l \Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau -\nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big], }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ m \in \mathbb{N} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ \mu \in \mathbb{Z} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ l=1,\dots,N }[/math].

Retrieved from "https://wikiwaves.org/wiki/index.php?title=Kagemoto_and_Yue_Interaction_Theory&oldid=12011"