Difference between revisions of "Introduction to the Inverse Scattering Transform"

From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
The Miura transformation is given by
 
The Miura transformation is given by
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
u=v^{2}+v_{x}
+
u=-v^{2}-\partial_x v\,
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
 
and if <math>v</math> satisfies the mKdV
 
and if <math>v</math> satisfies the mKdV
Line 26: Line 26:
 
then <math>u</math> satisfies the KdV (but not vice versa). We can think about the Miura
 
then <math>u</math> satisfies the KdV (but not vice versa). We can think about the Miura
 
transformation as being a nonlinear ODE solving for <math>v</math> given <math>u.</math> This
 
transformation as being a nonlinear ODE solving for <math>v</math> given <math>u.</math> This
nonlinear ODE is also known as the Riccati equation and there is a well know
+
nonlinear ODE is also known as the Riccati equation and there is a well known
 
transformation which linearises this equation. It we write
 
transformation which linearises this equation. It we write
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
Line 43: Line 43:
 
The eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of this scattering problem play a key role
 
The eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of this scattering problem play a key role
 
in the inverse scattering transformation. Note that this is Schrodinger's equation.
 
in the inverse scattering transformation. Note that this is Schrodinger's equation.
 +
 +
== Lecture Videos ==
 +
 +
=== Part 1 ===
 +
 +
{{#ev:youtube|P3uMk9OS8p4}}

Latest revision as of 03:26, 15 September 2020

Nonlinear PDE's Course
Current Topic Introduction to the Inverse Scattering Transform
Next Topic Properties of the Linear Schrodinger Equation
Previous Topic Conservation Laws for the KdV



The inverse scattering transformation gives a way to solve the KdV equation exactly. You can think about is as being an analogous transformation to the Fourier transformation, except it works for a non linear equation. We want to be able to solve

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{matrix} \partial_{t}u+6u\partial_{x}u+\partial_{x}^{3}u & =0\\ u(x,0) & =f\left( x\right) \end{matrix} }[/math]

with [math]\displaystyle{ \left\vert u\right\vert \rightarrow0 }[/math] as [math]\displaystyle{ x\rightarrow\pm\infty. }[/math]

The Miura transformation is given by

[math]\displaystyle{ u=-v^{2}-\partial_x v\, }[/math]

and if [math]\displaystyle{ v }[/math] satisfies the mKdV

[math]\displaystyle{ \partial_{t}v-6v^{2}\partial_{x}v+\partial_{x}^{3}v=0 }[/math]

then [math]\displaystyle{ u }[/math] satisfies the KdV (but not vice versa). We can think about the Miura transformation as being a nonlinear ODE solving for [math]\displaystyle{ v }[/math] given [math]\displaystyle{ u. }[/math] This nonlinear ODE is also known as the Riccati equation and there is a well known transformation which linearises this equation. It we write

[math]\displaystyle{ v=\frac{\left( \partial_{x}w\right) }{w} }[/math]

then we obtain the equation

[math]\displaystyle{ \partial_{x}^{2}w+uw=0 }[/math]

The KdV is invariant under the transformation [math]\displaystyle{ x\rightarrow x+6\lambda t, }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ u\rightarrow u+\lambda. }[/math] Therefore we consider the associated eigenvalue problem

[math]\displaystyle{ \partial_{x}^{2}w+uw=-\lambda w }[/math]

The eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of this scattering problem play a key role in the inverse scattering transformation. Note that this is Schrodinger's equation.

Lecture Videos

Part 1