Difference between revisions of "Wave Energy Density and Flux"
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
Consider two plane progressive waves of nearly equal frequencies and hence wavenumbers. Their joint wave elevation is given by | Consider two plane progressive waves of nearly equal frequencies and hence wavenumbers. Their joint wave elevation is given by | ||
− | <center><math> \zeta(x,t) = A cos ( \omega_1 t - K_1 x) + A cos ( \omega_2 t - K_2 x) </math></center> | + | <center><math> \zeta(x,t) = A cos ( \omega_1 t - K_1 x) + A cos ( \omega_2 t - K_2 x) \, </math></center> |
where the amplitude is assumed to be common and: | where the amplitude is assumed to be common and: | ||
− | <center><math> \omega_2 = \omega_1 + \Delta \omega, | \Delta\omega | \ll \omega_1 , \omega_2 </math></center> | + | <center><math> \omega_2 = \omega_1 + \Delta \omega, \quad | \Delta\omega | \ll \omega_1 , \omega_2 </math></center> |
− | <center><math> K_2 = K_1 + \Delta K, | \Delta K | \ll K_1 , K_2 </math></center> | + | <center><math> K_2 = K_1 + \Delta K, \quad | \Delta K | \ll K_1 , K_2 </math></center> |
Converting into complex notation: | Converting into complex notation: | ||
− | <center><math> \zeta(x,t) = A \mathbf{Re} \{ e^{i\omega_1 t - i K_1 x} + e^{i\omega_2 t - i | + | <center><math> \zeta(x,t) = A \mathbf{Re} \{ e^{i\omega_1 t - i K_1 x} + e^{i\omega_2 t - i K_2 x} \} = A \mathbf{Re} \{ e^{i\omega_1 t - i K_1 x} + e^{i\omega_1 t - i K_1 x + i \Delta\omega t - i \Delta K x} \} </math></center> <br> |
+ | <center><math> = A \mathbf{Re} \{ e^{i\omega_1 t - i \K_1 x} \left( 1 + e{i\Delta\omega t - i \Delta K x \right) \} </math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The combined wave elevation <math> \zeta \,</math> vanishes identically where <math> F \equiv 0 \, </math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> F = 0 \, \ </math> when: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center><math> e^{i(\Delta t - \Delta K x)} = -1 </math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | or when: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center><math> \Delta \omega t - \Delta K x = ( 2 n + 1 ) \pi, \qquad n = 0, 1, 2, \cdots </math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Solving for <math> x \, </math> we obtain: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center><math> x = \frac{1}{\Delta K} \{ (2n+1)\pi + t \Delta\omega \} \equiv X(t) </math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | For values of <math> X(t)\, </math> given above, <math> \zeta \equiv 0 \, </math>. These are the nodes of the bi-chrohatic wave train where at all times the elevatio vanishes and hence the evergy density <math> \equiv 0 </math>. The wave group has the form |
Revision as of 00:15, 16 February 2007
Energy Density, Energy Flux and Momentum Flux of Surface Waves
[math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon(t) = \ \mbox{Energy in control volume} \ \gamma(t) }[/math] :
Mean energy over unit horizongtal surface area [math]\displaystyle{ S \, }[/math] :
where [math]\displaystyle{ \zeta(t) \, }[/math] is free surface elevation.
Ignore term [math]\displaystyle{ -\frac{1}{2} \rho g H^2 \, }[/math] which represents the potential energy of the ocean at rest.
The remaining perturbation component is the sum of the kinetic and potential energy components
Consider now as a special case plane progressive waves defined by the velocity potential in deep water (for simplicity):
Lemma
Let:
[math]\displaystyle{ \overline{\varepsilon_{pot}} = \frac{1}{2} \rho g {\overline{\zeta(t)}}^2 = \frac{1}{4} \rho g A^2 }[/math]
Hence:
Energy flux = rate of change of energy density [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon(t) }[/math]
Transport theorem where [math]\displaystyle{ U_n }[/math] is normal velocity of surface [math]\displaystyle{ S(t) }[/math] outwards of the enclosed volume [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math].
Invoking the scalar form of Gauss's theorem in the frist term, we obtain:
An alternative form for the energy flux [math]\displaystyle{ P(t) \, }[/math] crossing the closed control surface [math]\displaystyle{ S(t) \, }[/math] is obtained by invoking Bernoulli's equation in the second term. Recall that:
At any point in the fluid domain and on boundarie.
Here we did allow [math]\displaystyle{ \ P_a \equiv \mbox{Atmospheric pressure} \ }[/math] to be non-zero for the sake of physical clarity. Upon substitution in [math]\displaystyle{ P(t) }[/math] we obtain the alternate form:
So the energy flux across [math]\displaystyle{ S(t)\, }[/math] is given by the terms under the interral sign. They can be collected in the more compact form:
Note that [math]\displaystyle{ P(t) \, }[/math] measures the energy flux into the volume [math]\displaystyle{ V(t) \, }[/math] or the rate of growth of the energy density [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon(t)\, }[/math].
We are ready now to apply the above formulae to the surface wave propagation problem.
Break [math]\displaystyle{ S(t) \, }[/math] into tis components and derive specialized forms of [math]\displaystyle{ P(t) \, }[/math] pertinent to each.
Therefore over [math]\displaystyle{ S_F; \ P(t) \equiv 0 }[/math] as expected. No energy can flow into the atmosphere!
This case will be of interest later in the course when we consider ships moving with constant velocity [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math].
The formulae derived above are very general for potential flows with a free surface and solid boundaries. We are now ready to apply them to plane progressive waves.
Energy flux across a vertical fluid boundary fixed in space.
Mean energy flux for a plane progressive wave follows upon substitution of the regular wave velocity potential and taking mean values:
or
It follows from this exercise that the mean energy flux of a plane progressive wave is the product of its mean energy density times a velocity which equals [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{1}{2} }[/math]. The phase velocity in deep water we call this the group velocity of deep water waves and it is defined as:
A more formal proof that this is the velocity with which the energy flux of plane progressive waves propagates is to ask the following question:
[math]\displaystyle{ \longrightarrow }[/math] What needs to be the horizontal velocity [math]\displaystyle{ U_n \equiv U }[/math] of a fluid boundary so that the mean energy flux across it vanishes?
This can be found from the solution of the following equation:
Where terms of [math]\displaystyle{ O(A^3) }[/math] have been neglected. Note that within linear theory, energy density and energy flux are quantities of [math]\displaystyle{ O(A^2) }[/math]. If higher-order terms are kept then we need to consider the treatment of second-order surface wave theory, at least.
Solving the above equation for [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] we obtain:
Upon substitution of the plane progressive wave velocity potential and definition of pressure from Bernoulli's equation we obtain:
Note that [math]\displaystyle{ U \equiv V_g }[/math] by definition. If the above exercise is repeated in water of finite depth the solution for [math]\displaystyle{ U }[/math] after some algebra is:
with
It may be shown that the group velocity [math]\displaystyle{ V_g }[/math] is given in terms of [math]\displaystyle{ \omega \ne k \, }[/math] by the relation
This relation follows from the very elegant "device" due to rayleigh which applies to any wave form:
Consider two plane progressive waves of nearly equal frequencies and hence wavenumbers. Their joint wave elevation is given by
where the amplitude is assumed to be common and:
Converting into complex notation:
The combined wave elevation [math]\displaystyle{ \zeta \, }[/math] vanishes identically where [math]\displaystyle{ F \equiv 0 \, }[/math].
[math]\displaystyle{ F = 0 \, \ }[/math] when:
or when:
Solving for [math]\displaystyle{ x \, }[/math] we obtain:
For values of [math]\displaystyle{ X(t)\, }[/math] given above, [math]\displaystyle{ \zeta \equiv 0 \, }[/math]. These are the nodes of the bi-chrohatic wave train where at all times the elevatio vanishes and hence the evergy density [math]\displaystyle{ \equiv 0 }[/math]. The wave group has the form