Difference between revisions of "Seakeeping In Random Waves"
From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 33: | Line 33: | ||
<center><math> \left|RAO_3\right|(\omega) = \left|RAO_3\right| \left( \omega_0 - U \frac{\omega_0^2}{g} \cos\beta \right) \equiv \left|RAO_3 \right| (\omega_0) \,</math></center> | <center><math> \left|RAO_3\right|(\omega) = \left|RAO_3\right| \left( \omega_0 - U \frac{\omega_0^2}{g} \cos\beta \right) \equiv \left|RAO_3 \right| (\omega_0) \,</math></center> | ||
− | New function of <math>\omega_0\,</math> by virtue of the <math> \omega \leftrightarrow\,</math> relation. | + | New function of <math>\omega_0\,</math> by virtue of the <math> \omega \leftrightarrow\, \omega_0 </math> relation. |
The standard deviation of heave follows by simple integration over <math> \omega_0\,</math>: | The standard deviation of heave follows by simple integration over <math> \omega_0\,</math>: |
Revision as of 22:36, 14 March 2007
Seakeeping in random waves
- Assume known the ambient wave spectral density [math]\displaystyle{ S_{\zeta}(\omega_0)\, }[/math] assumed unidirectional for simplicity
- [math]\displaystyle{ \int_0^\infty S_\zeta(\omega) d\omega = \sigma_\zeta^2 \equiv \, }[/math] Variance of the wave elevation of ambient random seastate, assumed Gaussian with zero mean
- Assuming that the [math]\displaystyle{ RAO(\omega)\, }[/math] of a seakeeping quantity [math]\displaystyle{ X(t) \, }[/math] has been determined from a frequency domain analysis;
Spectral analysis with forward-speed
- Ambient wave spectral density [math]\displaystyle{ S_\zeta(\omega_0)\, }[/math] is defined relative to the absolute wave frequency [math]\displaystyle{ \omega_0\, }[/math].
- The [math]\displaystyle{ RAO_X(\omega) \, }[/math] is usually defined relative to the encounter frequency [math]\displaystyle{ \omega\, }[/math].
- The relation of [math]\displaystyle{ \omega \leftrightarrow \omega_0 \, }[/math] is not single valued. The question thus arises of what is the [math]\displaystyle{ \sigma_X^2\, }[/math]?
Answer
- Given [math]\displaystyle{ \omega_0 \, }[/math], a single value of [math]\displaystyle{ \omega\, }[/math] always follows.
- The opposite is not always true. Given [math]\displaystyle{ \omega\, }[/math] there may exist multiple [math]\displaystyle{ \omega_0\, }[/math]'s satisfying the encounter frequency relation.
- Therefore it is much simpler to parameterize with respect to [math]\displaystyle{ \omega_0\, }[/math], even when the [math]\displaystyle{ RAO(\omega)\, }[/math] is evaluated as a function of [math]\displaystyle{ \omega\, }[/math].
Proceed as follows:
Simply redefine the [math]\displaystyle{ RAO(\omega)\, }[/math] as follows:
New function of [math]\displaystyle{ \omega_0\, }[/math] by virtue of the [math]\displaystyle{ \omega \leftrightarrow\, \omega_0 }[/math] relation.
The standard deviation of heave follows by simple integration over [math]\displaystyle{ \omega_0\, }[/math]:
- The opposite choice of parameterizing the above integral w.r.t. [math]\displaystyle{ \omega\, }[/math] ends up with a lot of unnecessary algebra.
Ocean Wave Interaction with Ships and Offshore Energy Systems