Difference between revisions of "Template:Separation of variables for a free surface"
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 03:47, 18 August 2008
Separation of variables for a free surface
We now separate variables and write the potential as
[math]\displaystyle{ \phi(x,z)=\zeta(z)\rho(x) }[/math]
Applying Laplace's equation we obtain
[math]\displaystyle{ \zeta_{zz}+k^{2}\zeta=0. }[/math]
We then use the boundary condition at [math]\displaystyle{ z=-h }[/math] to write
[math]\displaystyle{ \zeta=\cos k(z+h) }[/math]
The boundary condition at the free surface ([math]\displaystyle{ z=0 }[/math]) is
which is the Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface We denote the positive imaginary solution of this equation by [math]\displaystyle{ k_{0} }[/math] and the positive real solutions by [math]\displaystyle{ k_{m} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ m\geq1 }[/math]. We define
[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_{m}\left( z\right) =\frac{\cos k_{m}(z+h)}{\cos k_{m}h},\quad m\geq0 }[/math]
as the vertical eigenfunction of the potential in the open water region. From Sturm-Liouville theory the vertical eigenfunctions are orthogonal. They can be normalised to be orthonormal, but this has no advantages for a numerical implementation. It can be shown that
[math]\displaystyle{ \int\nolimits_{-h}^{0}\phi_{m}(z)\phi_{n}(z) d z=A_{n}\delta_{mn} }[/math]
where
[math]\displaystyle{ A_{n}=\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{\cos k_{n}h\sin k_{m}h+k_{n}h}{k_{n}\cos ^{2}k_{n}h}\right) }[/math]
.