Difference between revisions of "Removing the Depth Dependence"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | We are considering the [[Frequency Domain Problem]] for linear wave waves. | + | We are considering the [[Frequency Domain Problem]] for linear wave waves. |
− | If we have a problem in which the | + | {{fixed body finite depth equations in two dimensions}} |
− | + | ||
− | + | If we have a problem in which all the scatterers are of constant cross sections so | |
+ | that | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <math>\partial\Omega = \partial\hat{\Omega} \times z\in[-h,0] | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | where <math>\partial\hat{\Omega} </math> is a function only of <math>x,y</math> | ||
+ | i.e. the boundary of the scattering bodies is uniform with respect to depth. | ||
+ | Then we can remove the depth dependence by assuming | ||
that the dependence on depth is given by | that the dependence on depth is given by | ||
<center> | <center> |
Revision as of 08:54, 23 August 2008
We are considering the Frequency Domain Problem for linear wave waves. The Standard Linear Wave Scattering Problem in Finite Depth for a fixed body is
(note that the last expression can be obtained from combining the expressions:
where [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha = \omega^2/g \, }[/math]) The body boundary condition for a rigid body is just
The equation is subject to some radiation conditions at infinity. We assume the following. [math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{I}}\, }[/math] is a plane wave travelling in the [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] direction,
where [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is the wave amplitude (in potential) [math]\displaystyle{ \mathrm{i} k }[/math] is the positive imaginary solution of the Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface (note we are assuming that the time dependence is of the form [math]\displaystyle{ \exp(-\mathrm{i}\omega t) }[/math]) and
In two-dimensions the Sommerfeld Radiation Condition is
where [math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{{I}}} }[/math] is the incident potential.
If we have a problem in which all the scatterers are of constant cross sections so that
[math]\displaystyle{ \partial\Omega = \partial\hat{\Omega} \times z\in[-h,0] }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ \partial\hat{\Omega} }[/math] is a function only of [math]\displaystyle{ x,y }[/math] i.e. the boundary of the scattering bodies is uniform with respect to depth. Then we can remove the depth dependence by assuming that the dependence on depth is given by
[math]\displaystyle{ \Phi(x,y,z) = \frac{\cosh \big( k (z+h) \big)}{\cosh(k h)} \phi(x,y) }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] is the positive root of the Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface. Since [math]\displaystyle{ \Phi }[/math] satisfies Laplace's Equation, then [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] satisfies Helmholtz's Equation
[math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2 \phi - k^2 \phi = 0 }[/math]
in the region not occupied by the scatterers.