Difference between revisions of "Properties of the Linear Schrodinger Equation"
Mike smith (talk | contribs) |
|||
(23 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
incident waves. This is easiest seen through the following examples | incident waves. This is easiest seen through the following examples | ||
− | ==Example <math>\delta</math> function potential== | + | ==Example 1: <math>\delta</math> function potential== |
− | We consider here the case when <math>u\left( x,0\right) =\delta\left( x\right) | + | We consider here the case when <math>u\left( x,0\right) = u_0 \delta\left( x\right) |
.</math> Note that this function can be thought of as the limit as of the potential | .</math> Note that this function can be thought of as the limit as of the potential | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
In this case we need to solve | In this case we need to solve | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
− | \partial_{x}^{2}w+\ | + | \partial_{x}^{2}w+ u_0\delta(x) w=-\lambda w |
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
We consider the case of <math>\lambda<0</math> and <math>\lambda>0</math> separately. For the first | We consider the case of <math>\lambda<0</math> and <math>\lambda>0</math> separately. For the first | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
We have two conditions at <math>x=0,</math> <math>w</math> must be continuous at <math>0</math> and | We have two conditions at <math>x=0,</math> <math>w</math> must be continuous at <math>0</math> and | ||
<math>\partial_{x}w\left( 0^{+}\right) -\partial_{x}w\left( 0^{-}\right) | <math>\partial_{x}w\left( 0^{+}\right) -\partial_{x}w\left( 0^{-}\right) | ||
− | + | + | +u_0 w\left( 0\right) =0.</math> This final condition is obtained by integrating `across' zero as follows |
+ | <center><math>\begin{align} | ||
+ | \int_{0^{-}}^{0^{+}} \left(\partial_x^2 w +u_0\delta(x) w + \lambda w \right) \ \mathrm{d}x = 0. | ||
+ | \end{align} | ||
+ | </math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This gives the condition that <math>a=b</math> and | ||
<math>k=u_{0}/2.</math> We need to normalise the eigenfunctions so that | <math>k=u_{0}/2.</math> We need to normalise the eigenfunctions so that | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
− | \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left( w\left( x\right) \right) ^{2} | + | \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left( w\left( x\right) \right) ^{2}\mathrm{d}x=1. |
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
Therefore | Therefore | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
− | 2\int_{0}^{\infty}\left( ae^{-u_{0}x/2}\right) ^{2} | + | 2\int_{0}^{\infty}\left( ae^{-u_{0}x/2}\right) ^{2}\mathrm{d}x=1 |
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
which means that <math>a=\sqrt{u_{0}/2}.</math> Therefore, there is only one discrete | which means that <math>a=\sqrt{u_{0}/2}.</math> Therefore, there is only one discrete | ||
Line 71: | Line 77: | ||
\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}kx}+r\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}kx}, & x<0\\ | \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}kx}+r\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}kx}, & x<0\\ | ||
− | + | t\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}kx}, & x>0 | |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right. | \right. | ||
Line 79: | Line 85: | ||
+u_{0}w\left( 0\right) =0.</math> This gives us | +u_{0}w\left( 0\right) =0.</math> This gives us | ||
<center><math>\begin{matrix} | <center><math>\begin{matrix} | ||
− | 1+r & = | + | 1+r & =t\\ |
− | - | + | -ikt+ik-ikr & =-tu_{0} |
\end{matrix}</math></center> | \end{matrix}</math></center> | ||
which has solution | which has solution | ||
<center><math>\begin{matrix} | <center><math>\begin{matrix} | ||
r & =\frac{u_{0}}{2ik-u_{0}}\\ | r & =\frac{u_{0}}{2ik-u_{0}}\\ | ||
− | + | t & =\frac{2ik}{2ik-u_{0}} | |
\end{matrix}</math></center> | \end{matrix}</math></center> | ||
− | ==Example: | + | ==Example 2: Hat Function Potential== |
− | The properties of the eigenfunction is | + | The properties of the eigenfunction is perhaps seem most easily through the |
following example | following example | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
Line 96: | Line 102: | ||
\begin{matrix} | \begin{matrix} | ||
− | 0 & x\notin\left[ -\ | + | 0 & x\notin\left[ -\varsigma,\varsigma\right] \\ |
− | b & x\in\left[ -\ | + | b & x\in\left[ -\varsigma,\varsigma\right] |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right. | \right. | ||
Line 103: | Line 109: | ||
where <math>b>0.</math> | where <math>b>0.</math> | ||
− | ===Case when <math>\lambda | + | ===Case when <math>\lambda<0</math>=== |
If we solve this equation for the case when <math>\lambda<0,</math> <math>\lambda=-k^{2}</math> we | If we solve this equation for the case when <math>\lambda<0,</math> <math>\lambda=-k^{2}</math> we | ||
Line 110: | Line 116: | ||
w\left( x\right) =\left\{ | w\left( x\right) =\left\{ | ||
\begin{matrix} | \begin{matrix} | ||
− | + | a_{1}e^{kx}, & x<-\varsigma,\\ | |
− | a_{1}e^{kx}, & x<-\ | + | b_{1}\cos\kappa x+b_{2}\sin\kappa x, & -\varsigma< x <\varsigma,\\ |
− | b_{1}\cos\kappa x+b_{2}\sin\kappa x & -\ | + | a_{2}e^{-kx}, & x>\varsigma, |
− | a_{2}e^{-kx} & x>\ | ||
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right. | \right. | ||
Line 119: | Line 124: | ||
where <math>\kappa=\sqrt{b-k^{2}}</math> which means that <math>0\leq k\leq\sqrt{b}</math> (there is | where <math>\kappa=\sqrt{b-k^{2}}</math> which means that <math>0\leq k\leq\sqrt{b}</math> (there is | ||
no solution for <math>k>\sqrt{b}).</math> We then match <math>w</math> and its derivative at | no solution for <math>k>\sqrt{b}).</math> We then match <math>w</math> and its derivative at | ||
− | <math>x=\pm\ | + | <math>x=\pm\varsigma</math> to solve for <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>. This leads to two system of |
− | + | equations, one for the even (<math>a_{1}=a_{2}</math> and <math>b_{2}=0</math> ) and one for the odd | |
solutions (<math>a_{1}=-a_{2}</math> and <math>b_{1}=0)</math>. The solution for the even solutions | solutions (<math>a_{1}=-a_{2}</math> and <math>b_{1}=0)</math>. The solution for the even solutions | ||
is | is | ||
+ | <center><math> | ||
+ | w\left( x\right) =\left\{ | ||
+ | \begin{matrix} | ||
+ | a_{1}e^{kx}, & x<-\varsigma,\\ | ||
+ | b_{1}\cos\kappa x, & -\varsigma< x <\varsigma,\\ | ||
+ | a_{1}e^{-kx}, & x>\varsigma, | ||
+ | \end{matrix} | ||
+ | \right. | ||
+ | </math></center> | ||
+ | If we impose the condition that the function and its derivative are continuous at | ||
+ | <math>x=\pm\varsigma</math> we obtain the following equation | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\left( | \left( | ||
\begin{matrix} | \begin{matrix} | ||
− | e^{-k\ | + | e^{-k\varsigma} & -\cos\kappa\varsigma\\ |
− | ke^{-k\ | + | ke^{-k\varsigma} & -\kappa\sin\kappa\varsigma |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right) \left( | \right) \left( | ||
Line 149: | Line 165: | ||
\begin{matrix} | \begin{matrix} | ||
− | e^{-k\ | + | e^{-k\varsigma} & -\cos\kappa\varsigma\\ |
− | ke^{-k\ | + | ke^{-k\varsigma} & -\kappa\sin\kappa\varsigma |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right) =0 | \right) =0 | ||
Line 156: | Line 172: | ||
which gives us the equation | which gives us the equation | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
− | -\kappa e^{-k\ | + | -\kappa e^{-k\varsigma}\sin\kappa\varsigma+k\cos\kappa\varsigma |
− | e^{-k\ | + | e^{-k\varsigma}=0 |
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
or | or | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
− | \tan\kappa\ | + | \tan\kappa\varsigma=\frac{k}{\kappa} |
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
We know that <math>0<\kappa<\sqrt{b}</math> and if we plot this we see that we obtain a | We know that <math>0<\kappa<\sqrt{b}</math> and if we plot this we see that we obtain a | ||
Line 167: | Line 183: | ||
The solution for the odd solutions is | The solution for the odd solutions is | ||
+ | <center><math> | ||
+ | w\left( x\right) =\left\{ | ||
+ | \begin{matrix} | ||
+ | a_{1}e^{kx}, & x <-\varsigma,\\ | ||
+ | b_{2}\sin\kappa x, & -\varsigma< x <\varsigma,\\ | ||
+ | -a_{1}e^{-kx} & x > \varsigma, | ||
+ | \end{matrix} | ||
+ | \right. | ||
+ | </math></center> | ||
+ | and again imposing the condition that the solution and its derivative is continuous | ||
+ | at <math>x=\pm\varsigma</math> gives | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
\left( | \left( | ||
\begin{matrix} | \begin{matrix} | ||
− | e^{-k\ | + | e^{-k\varsigma} & \sin\kappa\varsigma\\ |
− | ke^{-k\ | + | ke^{-k\varsigma} & -\kappa\cos\kappa\varsigma |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right) \left( | \right) \left( | ||
Line 193: | Line 220: | ||
\begin{matrix} | \begin{matrix} | ||
− | e^{-k\ | + | e^{-k\varsigma} & \sin\kappa\varsigma\\ |
− | ke^{-k\ | + | ke^{-k\varsigma} & -\kappa\cos\kappa\varsigma |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right) =0 | \right) =0 | ||
Line 200: | Line 227: | ||
which gives us the equation | which gives us the equation | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
− | \kappa e^{-k}a\cos\kappa\ | + | \kappa e^{-k\varsigma}a\cos\kappa\varsigma+k\sin\kappa\varsigma e^{-k\varsigma}=0 |
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
or | or | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
− | \tan\kappa=-\frac{\kappa}{k} | + | \tan\varsigma\kappa=-\frac{\kappa}{k} |
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
− | |||
=== Case when <math>\lambda>0</math> === | === Case when <math>\lambda>0</math> === | ||
Line 215: | Line 241: | ||
\begin{matrix} | \begin{matrix} | ||
− | \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}kx}+r\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}kx}, & x<-\ | + | \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}kx}+r\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}kx}, & x <-\varsigma\\ |
− | b_{1}\cos\kappa x+b_{2}\sin\kappa x & -\ | + | b_{1}\cos\kappa x+b_{2}\sin\kappa x & -\varsigma< x <\varsigma\\ |
− | + | t\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}kx} & x>\varsigma | |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right. | \right. | ||
Line 227: | Line 253: | ||
\begin{matrix} | \begin{matrix} | ||
− | -\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}k\ | + | -\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}k\varsigma} & \cos\kappa\varsigma & -\sin\kappa\varsigma & 0\\ |
− | ik\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}k\ | + | ik\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}k\varsigma} & \kappa\sin\kappa\varsigma & \kappa\cos\kappa |
− | \ | + | \varsigma & 0\\ |
− | 0 & \cos\kappa\ | + | 0 & \cos\kappa\varsigma & \sin\kappa\varsigma & -\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}k\varsigma}\\ |
− | 0 & -\kappa\sin\kappa\ | + | 0 & -\kappa\sin\kappa\varsigma & \kappa\cos\kappa\varsigma & |
− | ik\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}k\ | + | ik\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}k\varsigma} |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right) \left( | \right) \left( | ||
Line 240: | Line 266: | ||
b_{1}\\ | b_{1}\\ | ||
b_{2}\\ | b_{2}\\ | ||
− | + | t | |
\end{matrix} | \end{matrix} | ||
\right) =\left( | \right) =\left( | ||
Line 252: | Line 278: | ||
\right) | \right) | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Lecture Videos == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Part 1 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{#ev:youtube|anAThvCcpNw}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Part 2 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{#ev:youtube|SDPIx42VjLQ}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Part 3 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{#ev:youtube|OUmjeLZWr3M}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Part 4 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{#ev:youtube|hIfcO3a8_XU}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Part 5 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{#ev:youtube|z13lKSTficA}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Part 6 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{#ev:youtube|2XlQpEscxE4}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Part 7 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{#ev:youtube|iMMQ4NUdXNc}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Part 8 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{#ev:youtube|0F_dINNxMlw}} |
Latest revision as of 01:03, 24 September 2020
Nonlinear PDE's Course | |
---|---|
Current Topic | Properties of the Linear Schrodinger Equation |
Next Topic | Connection betwen KdV and the Schrodinger Equation |
Previous Topic | Introduction to the Inverse Scattering Transform |
The linear Schrodinger equation
has two kinds of solutions for [math]\displaystyle{ u\rightarrow0 }[/math] as [math]\displaystyle{ x\rightarrow\pm\infty. }[/math] The first are waves and the second are bound solutions. It is well known that there are at most a finite number of bound solutions (provided [math]\displaystyle{ u\rightarrow0 }[/math] as [math]\displaystyle{ x\pm\infty }[/math] sufficiently rapidly) and a continum of solutions for the incident waves. This is easiest seen through the following examples
Example 1: [math]\displaystyle{ \delta }[/math] function potential
We consider here the case when [math]\displaystyle{ u\left( x,0\right) = u_0 \delta\left( x\right) . }[/math] Note that this function can be thought of as the limit as of the potential
In this case we need to solve
We consider the case of [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\lt 0 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\gt 0 }[/math] separately. For the first case we write [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda=-k^{2} }[/math] and we obtain
We have two conditions at [math]\displaystyle{ x=0, }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ w }[/math] must be continuous at [math]\displaystyle{ 0 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \partial_{x}w\left( 0^{+}\right) -\partial_{x}w\left( 0^{-}\right) +u_0 w\left( 0\right) =0. }[/math] This final condition is obtained by integrating `across' zero as follows
This gives the condition that [math]\displaystyle{ a=b }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ k=u_{0}/2. }[/math] We need to normalise the eigenfunctions so that
Therefore
which means that [math]\displaystyle{ a=\sqrt{u_{0}/2}. }[/math] Therefore, there is only one discrete spectral point which we denote by [math]\displaystyle{ k_{1}=u_{0}/2 }[/math]
The continuous eigenfunctions correspond to [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda=k^{2}\gt 0 }[/math] are of the form
Again we have the conditions that [math]\displaystyle{ w }[/math] must be continuous at [math]\displaystyle{ 0 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \partial_{x}w\left( 0^{+}\right) -\partial_{x}w\left( 0^{-}\right) +u_{0}w\left( 0\right) =0. }[/math] This gives us
which has solution
Example 2: Hat Function Potential
The properties of the eigenfunction is perhaps seem most easily through the following example
where [math]\displaystyle{ b\gt 0. }[/math]
Case when [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\lt 0 }[/math]
If we solve this equation for the case when [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\lt 0, }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda=-k^{2} }[/math] we get
where [math]\displaystyle{ \kappa=\sqrt{b-k^{2}} }[/math] which means that [math]\displaystyle{ 0\leq k\leq\sqrt{b} }[/math] (there is no solution for [math]\displaystyle{ k\gt \sqrt{b}). }[/math] We then match [math]\displaystyle{ w }[/math] and its derivative at [math]\displaystyle{ x=\pm\varsigma }[/math] to solve for [math]\displaystyle{ a }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ b }[/math]. This leads to two system of equations, one for the even ([math]\displaystyle{ a_{1}=a_{2} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ b_{2}=0 }[/math] ) and one for the odd solutions ([math]\displaystyle{ a_{1}=-a_{2} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ b_{1}=0) }[/math]. The solution for the even solutions is
If we impose the condition that the function and its derivative are continuous at [math]\displaystyle{ x=\pm\varsigma }[/math] we obtain the following equation
This has non trivial solutions when
which gives us the equation
or
We know that [math]\displaystyle{ 0\lt \kappa\lt \sqrt{b} }[/math] and if we plot this we see that we obtain a finite number of solutions.
The solution for the odd solutions is
and again imposing the condition that the solution and its derivative is continuous at [math]\displaystyle{ x=\pm\varsigma }[/math] gives
This can non trivial solutions when
which gives us the equation
or
Case when [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\gt 0 }[/math]
When [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\gt 0 }[/math] we write [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda=k^{2} }[/math] and we obtain solution
where [math]\displaystyle{ \kappa=\sqrt{b+k^{2}}. }[/math] Matching [math]\displaystyle{ w }[/math] and its derivaties at [math]\displaystyle{ x=\pm1 }[/math] we obtain