Difference between revisions of "McIver 1996"
From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (McIver (1996) moved to McIver 1996a) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | M. McIver 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. ''Journal of Fluid Mechanics'', '''315''', 257-266. | + | [[Maureen McIver|M. McIver]] 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. ''Journal of Fluid Mechanics'', '''315''', 257-266. |
This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is | This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting | potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting | ||
point for the construction of [[Trapped Modes]]. | point for the construction of [[Trapped Modes]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Reference]] |
Latest revision as of 01:33, 2 June 2006
M. McIver 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 315, 257-266.
This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is not unique. The proof relied on constructing a counter example by producing a wave-free potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting point for the construction of Trapped Modes.