Difference between revisions of "Kagemoto and Yue Interaction Theory"

From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(119 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
= Introduction =
 +
 
This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a [[Wide Spacing Approximation]]).
 
This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a [[Wide Spacing Approximation]]).
The theory uses the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] and [[Graf's Addition Theorem]] to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]].
+
The theory uses the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] and [[Graf's Addition Theorem]] to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]]. [[Interaction Theory for Cylinders]] presents a simplified version for cylinders.  
  
The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordiates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with its local coordinates. Using the [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]], which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained.   
+
The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordinates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]] associated with its local coordinates. Using the [[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]], which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained.   
  
 
The theory is described in [[Kagemoto and Yue 1986]] and in
 
The theory is described in [[Kagemoto and Yue 1986]] and in
[[Peter and Meylan 2004]].
+
[[Peter and Meylan 2004]].
 +
 
 +
The derivation of the theory in [[Infinite Depth]] is also presented, see
 +
[[Kagemoto and Yue Interaction Theory for Infinite Depth]].
 
   
 
   
[[Category:Linear Water-Wave Theory]]
+
[[Category:Interaction Theory]]
  
 +
= Equations of Motion =
  
 +
The problem consists of <math>n</math> bodies
 +
<math>\Delta_j</math> with immersed body
 +
surface <math>\Gamma_j</math>. Each body is subject to
 +
the [[Standard Linear Wave Scattering Problem]] and the particluar
 +
equations of motion for each body (e.g. rigid, or freely floating)
 +
can be different for each body.
 +
It is a [[Frequency Domain Problem]] with frequency <math>\omega</math>.
 +
The solution is exact, up to the
 +
restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any
 +
other body.
 +
To simplify notation, <math>\mathbf{y} = (x,y,z)</math> always denotes a point
 +
in the water, which is assumed to be of [[Finite Depth]] <math>h</math>,
 +
while <math>\mathbf{x}</math> always denotes a point of the undisturbed water
 +
surface assumed at <math>z=0</math>.
  
 +
{{standard linear wave scattering equations}}
  
 +
The [[Sommerfeld Radiation Condition]] is also imposed.
  
 +
=Eigenfunction expansion of the potential=
  
We extend the finite depth interaction theory of [[kagemoto86]] to
+
Each body is subject to an incident potential and moves in response to this
water of infinite depth and bodies of arbitrary geometry. The sum
+
incident potential to produce a scattered potential. Each of these is
over the discrete roots of the dispersion equation in the finite depth
+
expanded using the [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]]
theory becomes
+
The scattered potential of a body
an integral in the infinite depth theory. This means that the infinite
+
<math>\Delta_j</math> can be expressed as
dimensional diffraction
+
<center><math>
transfer matrix
+
\phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) =
in the finite depth theory must be replaced by an integral
+
\sum_{m=0}^{\infty} f_m(z) \sum_{\mu = -
operator. In the numerical solution of the equations, this
+
\infty}^{\infty} A_{m \mu}^j K_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_j},
integral operator is approximated by a sum and a linear system
+
</math></center>
of equations is obtained. We also show how the calculations
+
with discrete coefficients <math>A_{m \mu}^j</math>, where <math>(r_j,\theta_j,z)</math>
of the diffraction transfer matrix for bodies of arbitrary
+
are cylindrical polar coordinates centered at each body
geometry developed by [[goo90]] can be extended to
+
<center><math>
infinite depth, and how the diffraction transfer matrix for rotated bodies can
+
f_m(z) = \frac{\cos k_m (z+h)}{\cos k_m h}.
be easily calculated. This interaction theory is applied to the wave forcing
+
</math></center>
of multiple ice floes and a method to solve
+
where <math>k_m</math> are found from <math>\alpha</math> by the [[Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface]]
the full diffraction problem in this case is presented. Convergence
+
<center><math>
studies comparing the interaction method with the full diffraction
+
\alpha + k_m \tan k_m h = 0\,.
calculations and the finite and infinite depth interaction methods are
+
</math></center>
carried out.
+
where <math>k_0</math> is the
 +
imaginary root with negative imaginary part
 +
and <math>k_m</math>, <math>m>0</math>, are given the positive real roots ordered
 +
with increasing size.  
  
 +
The incident potential upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can be also be expanded in
 +
regular cylindrical eigenfunctions,
 +
<center><math>
 +
\phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z)
 +
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^j I_\nu (k_n r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_j},
 +
</math></center>
 +
with discrete coefficients <math>D_{n\nu}^j</math>. In these expansions, <math>I_\nu</math>
 +
and <math>K_\nu</math> denote the modified [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_function : Bessel functions]
 +
of the first and second kind, respectively, both of order <math>\nu</math>.
  
 +
Note that the term for <math>m =0</math> or
 +
<math>n=0</math> corresponds to the propagating modes while the
 +
terms for <math>m\geq 1</math> (<math>n\geq 1</math>) correspond to the evanescent modes.
  
 +
=Derivation of the system of equations=
  
 +
A system of equations for the unknown
 +
coefficients of the
 +
scattered wavefields of all bodies is developed. This system of
 +
equations is based on transforming the
 +
scattered potential of <math>\Delta_j</math> into an incident potential upon
 +
<math>\Delta_l</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>). Doing this for all bodies simultaneously,
 +
and relating the incident and scattered potential for each body, a system
 +
of equations for the unknown coefficients is developed.
 +
Making use of the periodicity of the geometry and of the ambient incident
 +
wave, this system of equations can then be simplified.
  
==Finite Depth Interaction Theory==
+
The scattered potential <math>\phi_j^{\mathrm{S}}</math> of body <math>\Delta_j</math> needs to be
 +
represented in terms of the incident potential <math>\phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}</math>
 +
upon <math>\Delta_l</math>, <math>j \neq l</math>. This can be accomplished by using
 +
[[Graf's Addition Theorem]]
 +
<center><math>
 +
K_\tau(k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\tau (\theta_j-\varphi_{jl})} =
 +
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} K_{\tau + \nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \,
 +
I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu (\pi - \theta_l + \varphi_{jl})}, \quad j \neq l,
 +
</math></center>
 +
which is valid provided that <math>r_l < R_{jl}</math>. Here, <math>(R_{jl},\varphi_{jl})</math>  are the polar coordinates of the mean centre position of <math>\Delta_{l}</math> in the local coordinates of <math>\Delta_{j}</math>.
  
We will compare the performance of the infinite depth interaction theory
+
The limitation <math>r_l < R_{jl}</math> only requires that the escribed cylinder of each body
with the equivalent theory for finite
+
<math>\Delta_l</math> does not enclose any other origin <math>O_j</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>). However, the
depth. As we have stated previously, the finite depth theory was
+
expansion of the scattered and incident potential in cylindrical
developed by [[kagemoto86]] and extended to bodies of arbitrary
+
eigenfunctions is only valid outside the escribed cylinder of each
geometry by [[goo90]]. We will briefly present this theory in
+
body. Therefore the condition that the
our notation and the comparisons will be made in a later section.  
+
escribed cylinder of each body <math>\Delta_l</math> does not enclose any other
 +
origin <math>O_j</math> (<math>j \neq l</math>) is superseded by the more rigorous
 +
restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any
 +
other body.  
  
In water of constant finite depth <math>d</math>, the scattered potential of a body
+
Making use of the eigenfunction expansion as well as [[Graf's Addition Theorem]], the scattered potential
<math>\Delta_j</math> can be expanded in cylindrical eigenfunctions,
+
of <math>\Delta_j</math> can be expressed in terms of the
<center><math> (basisrep_out_d)
+
incident potential upon <math>\Delta_l</math> as
\phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) &= \frac{\cosh k(z+d)}{\cosh kd}
+
<center><math>
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{0 \nu}^j H_\nu^{(1)} (k r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
+
\phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z)  
\theta_j}\\
+
= \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\tau = -
&\quad + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos k_m (z+d)}{\cos kd} \sum_{\nu = -
+
\infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
\infty}^{\infty} A_{m \nu}^j K_\nu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
+
(-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m  R_{jl}) I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
\theta_j},
+
\theta_l} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau-\nu) \varphi_{jl}}  
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
with discrete coefficients <math>A_{m \nu}^j</math>. The positive wavenumber <math>k</math>
+
<center><math>
is related to <math>\alpha</math> by the dispersion relation
+
= \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\nu =
<center><math> (eq_k)
+
-\infty}^{\infty}  \Big[ \sum_{\tau = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j
\alpha = k \tanh k d,
+
(-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu)
 +
\varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
and the values of <math>k_m</math>, <math>m>0</math>, are given as positive real roots of
+
The ambient incident wavefield <math>\phi^{\mathrm{In}}</math> can also be
the dispersion relation
+
expanded in the eigenfunctions corresponding to the incident wavefield upon
<center><math> (eq_k_m)
+
<math>\Delta_l</math>. Let <math>\tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l}</math> denote the coefficients of this
\alpha + k_m \tan k_m d = 0.
+
ambient incident wavefield in the incoming eigenfunction expansion for
</math></center>
+
<math>\Delta_l</math> (cf. the example in [[Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion]]).
The incident potential upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can be also be expanded in
+
<center><math>
cylindrical eigenfunctions,
+
\phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
<center><math> (basisrep_in_d)
+
\tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} I_\nu (k_n
\phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) &= \frac{\cosh k(z+d)}{\cosh kd}
+
r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}.
\sum_{\mu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{0 \mu}^j J_\mu (k r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
 
\theta_j}\\
 
& \quad + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{\cos k_m (z+d)}{\cos kd} \sum_{\mu = -
 
\infty}^{\infty} D_{m\mu}^j I_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu
 
\theta_j},
 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
with discrete coefficients <math>D_{m\mu}^j</math>. A system of equations for the
+
The total
coefficients of the scattered wavefields for the bodies are derived
+
incident wavefield upon body <math>\Delta_j</math> can now be expressed as  
in an analogous way to the infinite depth case. The derivation is
 
simpler because all the coefficients are discrete and the
 
diffraction transfer operator can be represented by an
 
infinite dimensional matrix.
 
Truncating the infinite dimensional matrix as well as the
 
coefficient vectors appropriately, the resulting system of
 
equations is given by 
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
{\bf a}_l = {\bf B}_l \Big( {\bf d}_l^\mathrm{In} +
+
\phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) = \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) +
\sum_{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{j=1}{j \neq l}}^{N} \trans {\bf T}_{jl} \,
+
\sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \, \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}}
{\bf a}_j \Big), \quad  l=1, \ldots, N,  
+
(r_l,\theta_l,z)
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
where <math>{\bf a}_l</math> is the coefficient vector of the scattered
+
This allows us to write
wave, <math>{\bf d}_l^\mathrm{In}</math> is the coefficient vector of the
+
<center><math>
ambient incident wave, <math>{\bf B}_l</math> is the diffraction transfer
+
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z)
matrix of <math>\Delta_l</math> and <math>{\bf T}_{jl}</math> is the coordinate transformation
+
\sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^l I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}
matrix analogous to (T_elem_deep).
 
 
 
The calculation of the diffraction transfer matrices is
 
also similar to the infinite depth case. The finite depth
 
Green's function
 
<center><math> (green_d)
 
&G(r,\theta,z;s,\varphi,c)\\ &= \frac{\i}{2} \,
 
\frac{\alpha^2-k^2}{d(\alpha^2-k^2)-\alpha}\, \cosh k(z+d) \cosh k(c+d)
 
\sum_{\nu=-\infty}^{\infty} H_\nu^{(1)}(k r) J_\nu(k s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
(\theta - \varphi)}\\ 
 
& \quad + \frac{1}{\pi} \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}
 
\frac{k_m^2+\alpha^2}{d(k_m^2+\alpha^2)-\alpha}\, \cos k_m(z+d) \cos
 
k_m(c+d) \sum_{\nu=-\infty}^{\infty} K_\nu(k_m r) I_\nu(k_m s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
 
(\theta - \varphi)},
 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
given by [[black75]] and [[fenton78]], needs to be used instead
+
<center><math>
of the infinite depth Green's function  (green_inf).
+
= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty}
The elements of <math>{\bf B}_j</math> are therefore given by
+
\Big[  \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
<center><math> (B_elem_d)
+
\sum_{j=1,j \neq  l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
+
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu}  (k_n
({\bf B}_j)_{pq} &= \frac{\i}{2} \,
+
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_n
\frac{(\alpha^2-k^2)\cosh^2 kd}{d(\alpha^2-k^2)-\alpha} \int\limits_{\Gamma_j}
+
r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}.
\cosh k(c+d) J_p(\alpha s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p \varphi} \varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta})
 
\mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}\\
 
=and= 
 
({\bf B}_j)_{pq} &= \frac{1}{\pi}
 
\frac{(k_m^2+\alpha^2)\cos^2 k_md}{d(k_m^2+\alpha^2)-\alpha}
 
\int\limits_{\Gamma_j} \cos k_m(c+d) I_p(\eta s) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}p
 
\varphi} \varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta}) \mathrm{d}\sigma_\mathbf{\zeta}
 
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
</math></center>
 
for the propagating and the decaying modes respectively, where
 
<math>\varsigma_q^j(\mathbf{\zeta})</math> is the source strength distribution
 
due to an incident potential of mode <math>q</math> of the form
 
<center><math> (test_modes_d)
 
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
 
\phi_q^{\mathrm{I}}(s,\varphi,c) &= \frac{\cosh k_m(c+d)}{\cosh kd}
 
H_q^{(1)} (k s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \varphi}\\
 
=for the propagating modes, and= 
 
\phi_q^{\mathrm{I}}(s,\varphi,c) &= \frac{\cos k_m(c+d)}{\cos kd} K_q
 
(k_m s) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}q \varphi}
 
\end{matrix}</math></center>
 
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
for the decaying modes.
+
It therefore follows that
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
==Numerical Results==
 
 
 
In this section we will present some calculations using the interaction
 
theory in finite and infinite depth and the full
 
diffraction method in finite and infinite depth.
 
These will be based on calculations for ice floes. We begin with some
 
convergence tests which aim to compare the various methods. It needs
 
to be noted that this comparison is only of numerical nature since the
 
interactions methods as well as the full diffraction calculations
 
are exact in an analytical sense. However, numerical calculations
 
require truncations which affect the different methods in different
 
ways. Especially the dependence on these truncations will be investigated.
 
 
 
===Convergence Test===
 
We will present some convergence tests that aim to compare the
 
performance of the interaction theory with the full diffraction
 
calculations and to compare the
 
performance of the finite and infinite depth interaction methods in deep water.
 
The comparisons will be conducted for the case of two square ice floes
 
in three different arrangements.
 
In the full diffraction calculation the ice floes
 
are discretised in <math>24 \times 24 = 576</math> elements. For the full diffraction
 
calculation the resulting linear system of equations to be solved is
 
therefore 1152. As will be seen, once the diffraction
 
transfer matrix has been calculated (and saved), the dimension of the
 
linear system of equations to be solved in the interaction method is
 
considerably smaller. It is given by twice the dimension of the
 
diffraction transfer matrix. The most challenging situation for the
 
interaction theory is when the bodies are close together. For this
 
reason we choose the distance such that the escribed circles
 
of the two ice floes just overlap. It must be recalled that the
 
interaction theory is valid as long as the escribed cylinder of a body
 
does not intersect with any other body.
 
 
 
Both ice floes have non-dimensionalised
 
stiffness <math>\beta = 0.02</math>, mass <math>\gamma = 0.02</math> and Poisson's ratio
 
is chosen as <math>\nu=0.3333</math>. The wavelength of
 
the ambient incident wave is <math>\lambda = 2</math>. Each ice floe has
 
side length 2. The ambient
 
wavefield is of unit amplitude and propagates in the <math>x</math>-direction.
 
Three different arrangements are chosen to compare the results of the
 
finite depth interaction method in deep water and the infinite depth
 
interaction method with the corresponding full diffraction
 
calculations. In the first arrangement the second ice floe is located
 
behind the first, in the second arrangement it is located
 
beside, and the third arrangement it is both
 
beside and behind. The exact positions of the ice floes
 
are given in table (tab:pos).
 
 
 
\begin{table}
 
\begin{center}
 
\begin{tabular}{@{}ccc@{}}
 
arrangement & <math>O_1</math> & <math>O_2</math>\<center><math>3pt]
 
1 & <math>(-1.4,0)</math> & <math>(1.4,0)</math>\\
 
2 & <math>(0,-1.4)</math> & <math>(0,1.4)</math>\\
 
3 & <math>(-1.4,-0.6)</math> & <math>(1.4,0.6)</math>
 
\end{tabular}
 
\caption{Positions of the ice floes in the different arrangements.} (tab:pos)
 
\end{center}
 
\end{table}
 
 
 
Figure (fig:tsf) shows the
 
solutions corresponding to the three arrangements in the case of water
 
of infinite depth. To illustrate the effect on the water in the
 
vicinity of the ice floes, the water displacement is also shown.
 
It is interesting
 
to note that the ice floe in front is barely influenced by the
 
floe behind while the motion of the floe behind is quite
 
different from its motion in the absence of the floe in front.
 
 
 
\begin{figure}
 
\begin{center}
 
 
 
\includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x0_y28_v5_b02_chi2}\<center><math>0.4cm]
 
\includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x0_y28_v5_b02_chi0}\<center><math>0.4cm]
 
\includegraphics[width=8.2cm]{int_n11_x12_y28_v5_b02_chi2}
 
 
 
\end{center}
 
\caption{Surface displacement of the ice floes
 
and the water in their vicinity,\newline arrangements 1, 2 and 3.} (fig:tsf)
 
\end{figure}
 
 
 
To compare the results, a measure of
 
the error from the full diffraction calculation is used. We calculate
 
the full diffraction solution with a sufficient number of points
 
so that we may use it to approximate the exact solution.
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
E_2 = \left( \, \int\limits_{\Delta}
+
D_{n\nu}^l  =  
\big| w_{i}(\mathbf{x})-w_{f}(\mathbf{x}) \big|^2 \mathrm{d}\mathbf{x} \,
+
  \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
\right)^{1/2},
+
\sum_{j=1,j \neq  l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
 +
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n
 +
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}}  
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
where <math>w_{i}</math> and <math>w_{f}</math> are the solutions of the
 
interaction method and the corresponding full diffraction calculation
 
respectively. It would also be possible to compare other errors, the
 
maximum difference of the solutions for example, but the results are
 
very similar.
 
 
It is worth noting that the finite depth interaction method
 
only converges up to a certain depth if used with the
 
eigenfunction expansion of the finite depth Green's function  (green_d).
 
This is because of the factor
 
<math>\alpha^2-k^2</math> in the term of propagating modes of the Green's
 
function. The Green's function can
 
be rewritten by making use of the dispersion relation  (eq_k)
 
\cite[as suggested by][p. 26, for example]{linton01}
 
and the depth restriction of the finite depth interaction method for
 
bodies of arbitrary geometry can be circumvented.
 
  
The truncation parameters for the interaction methods will
+
= Final Equations =
now be considered for both finite and infinite depth.
 
The number of propagating modes and angular decaying
 
components are free parameters in both methods. In
 
finite depth, the number of decaying roots of the dispersion relation
 
needs to be chosen while in infinite depth the discretisation of
 
a continuous variable must be selected.
 
In the infinite depth case we are free to choose the number of
 
points as well as the points themselves. In water of finite depth, the depth
 
can also be considered a free parameter as long as it is chosen large
 
enough to account for deep water.
 
  
Truncating the infinite sums in the eigenfunction expansion of the
+
The scattered and incident potential of each body <math>\Delta_l</math> can be related by the
outgoing water velocity potential for infinite depth with
+
[[Diffraction Transfer Matrix]] acting in the following way,
truncation parameters <math>T_H</math> and <math>T_K</math> and discretising the integration
 
by defining a set of nodes, </math>0\leq\eta_1 < \ldots < \eta_m < \ldots <
 
\eta_{_{T_R}}<math>, with weights </math>h_m<math>, the potential for infinite depth
 
can be approximated by
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
\phi (r,\theta,z) &= \mathrm{e}^{\alpha z} \sum_{\nu = -
+
A_{m \mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{m n
T_H}^{T_H} A_{0\nu} H_\nu^{(1)} (\alpha r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu
+
\mu \nu}^l D_{n\nu}^l.
\theta}\\
 
&\quad + \sum_{m=1}^{T_R} h_m \, \psi (z,\eta_m) \sum_{\nu = -
 
T_K}^{T_K} A_{\nu} (\eta_m) K_\nu (\eta_m r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}.  
 
 
</math></center>  
 
</math></center>  
In the following, the integration weights are chosen to be </math>h_m =
+
 
1/2\,(\eta_{m+1}-\eta_{m-1})<math>, </math>m=2, \ldots, T_R-1<math> and </math>h_1 =
+
The substitution of this into the equation for relating
\eta_2-\eta_1<math> as well as </math>h_{_{T_R}} =
+
the coefficients <math>D_{n\nu}^l</math> and
\eta_{_{T_R}}-\eta_{_{T_R-1}}<math>, which corresponds to the mid-point
+
<math>A_{m \mu}^l</math>gives the
quadrature rule.
+
required equations to determine the coefficients of the scattered
Different quadrature rules such as Gaussian quadrature
+
wavefields of all bodies,  
could be considered. Although in general this would lead to better
 
results, the mid-point rule allows a clever
 
choice of the discretisation points so that the convergence with
 
Gaussian quadrature is no better.
 
In finite depth, the analogous truncation leads to
 
 
<center><math>
 
<center><math>
\phi (r,\theta,z) &= \frac{\cosh k (z+d)}{\cosh kd} \sum_{\nu = -
+
A_{m\mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}
T_H}^{T_H} A_{0\nu} H_\nu^{(1)} (k r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}\\
+
\sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{mn\mu\nu}^l
& \quad + \sum_{m = 1}^{T_R} \frac{\cos k_m(z+d)}{\cos k_m d}
+
\Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} +
\sum_{\nu = - T_K}^{T_K} A_{m\nu} K_\nu (k_m r) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta}.
+
\sum_{j=1,j \neq  l}^{N} \sum_{\tau =
 +
-\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu(k_n
 +
R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau -\nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big],
 
</math></center>
 
</math></center>
In both cases, the dimension of the diffraction transfer matrix,
+
<math>m \in \mathbb{N}</math>, <math>\mu \in \mathbb{Z}</math>, <math>l=1,\dots,N</math>.
<math>\mathbf{B}</math>, is given by <math>2 \, T_H+1+T_R \, (2 \, T_K+1)</math>.
 
 
 
Since the choice of the number of propagating
 
modes and angular decaying components affects the finite and
 
infinite depth methods in similar ways, the dependence on these
 
parameters will not be further presented. Thorough convergence tests
 
have shown that in the settings investigated here, it is sufficient to
 
choose <math>T_H</math> to be 11 and <math>T_K</math> to be 5. Further increasing these
 
parameter values does not result in smaller errors (as compared
 
to the full diffraction calculation with 576 elements per floe).
 
We will now compare the convergence of the infinite depth and
 
the finite depth methods if <math>T_H</math> and <math>T_K</math> are
 
fixed (with the previously mentioned values) and <math>T_R</math> is varied. To be able to
 
compare the results, the discretisation of the continuous variable
 
will always be the same for fixed <math>T_R</math> and these are
 
shown in table (tab:discr).
 
It should be noted that if only one node is used the integration
 
weight is chosen to be 1.
 
 
 
\begin{table}
 
\begin{center}
 
\begin{tabular}{@{}cl@{}}
 
<math>T_R</math> & discretisation of <math>\eta</math>\<center><math>3pt]
 
1 & \{ 2.1 \}\\
 
2 & \{ 1.2, 2.7 \}\\
 
3 & \{ 0.8, 1.8, 3.0 \}\\
 
4 & \{ 0.4, 1.4, 2.2, 3.2 \}\\
 
5 & \{ 0.2, 1.0, 1.8, 3.0, 4.6 \}
 
\end{tabular}
 
\caption{The different discretisations used in the convergence tests.} (tab:discr)
 
\end{center}
 
\end{table}
 
 
Figures (fig:behind), (fig:beside) and (fig:shifted) show the convergence for arrangement 1, arrangement 2 and arrangement 3, respectively, for
 
the infinite depth method and the finite depth method with depth 2
 
(plot (a)) and depth 4 (plot (b)).
 
Since the ice floes are located beside each other
 
in arrangement 2 the average errors are the same for both floes.
 
As can be seen from figures (fig:behind), (fig:beside) and
 
(fig:shifted) the convergence of the infinite depth method
 
is similar to that of the finite depth method. Used with depth 2, the
 
convergence of the finite depth method is generally better than that
 
of the infinite depth method while used with depth 4, the infinite depth
 
method achieves the better results. Tests with other depths show that
 
the performance of the finite depth method decreases with increasing
 
water depth as expected. In general, since the wavelength is 2, a depth
 
of <math>d=2</math> should approximate infinite depth and hence there is no
 
advantage to using the infinite depth theory. However, as mentioned
 
previously, for certain situations such as ice floes it is not necessarily
 
true that <math>d=2</math> will approximate infinite depth. 
 
 
 
\begin{figure}
 
\begin{center}
 
\begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}} 
 
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{behind_d2}&&
 
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{behind_d4}
 
\end{tabular}
 
\caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
 
arrangement 1.} (fig:behind)
 
\end{center}
 
\end{figure}
 
 
 
\begin{figure}
 
\begin{center}
 
\begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}} 
 
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{beside_d2}&&
 
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{beside_d4}
 
\end{tabular}
 
\caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
 
arrangement 2.} (fig:beside)
 
\end{center}
 
\end{figure}
 
 
 
\begin{figure}
 
\begin{center}
 
\begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.02\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}} 
 
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{shifted_d2}&&
 
\includegraphics[height=0.38\columnwidth]{shifted_d4}
 
\end{tabular}
 
\caption{Development of the errors as <math>T_R</math> is increased in
 
arrangement 3.} (fig:shifted)
 
\end{center}
 
\end{figure}
 
 
 
===Multiple ice floe results===
 
We will now present results for multiple ice floes of different
 
geometries and in different arrangements on water of infinite depth.
 
We choose the floe arrangements arbitrarily, since there are
 
no known special ice floe arrangements, such as those that give
 
rise to resonances in the infinite limit.
 
In all plots, the wavelength <math>\lambda</math> has been chosen to
 
be <math>2</math>, the stiffness <math>\beta</math> and the mass <math>\gamma</math> of the ice
 
floes to be 0.02 and Poisson's ratio <math>\nu</math> is <math>0.3333</math>. The ambient
 
wavefield of amplitude 1 propagates in
 
the positive direction of the <math>x</math>-axis, thus it travels from left to
 
right in the plots. 
 
 
 
Figure (fig:int_arb) shows the
 
displacements of multiple interacting ice floes of different shapes and
 
in different arrangements. Since square elements have been used to
 
represent the floes, non-rectangular geometries are approximated.
 
All ice floes have an area of 4 and the escribing circles do not
 
intersect with any of the other ice floes.
 
The plots show the displacement of the ice floes at time <math>t=0</math>.
 
 
 
\begin{figure}
 
\begin{center}
 
\begin{tabular}{p{0.46\columnwidth}p{0.03\columnwidth}p{0.46\columnwidth}}
 
\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_tr_tr_tr_tr_in} &&
 
\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_tr_tr_tr_tr_out}\<center><math>0.2cm]
 
\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_rh_rh_rh} &&
 
\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{mult_n15_sq_sq_sq_sq_sq}\\
 
\end{tabular}
 
\end{center}
 
\caption{Surface displacement of interacting ice floes of different geometries.} (fig:int_arb)
 
\end{figure}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
==Summary==
 
The finite depth interaction theory developed by
 
[[kagemoto86]] has been extended to water of infinite
 
depth. Furthermore, using the eigenfunction
 
expansion of the infinite depth free surface Green's function we have
 
been able to calculate the diffraction transfer matrices for bodies of
 
arbitrary geometry. We also showed how the diffraction transfer
 
matrices can be calculated efficiently for different orientations of
 
the body.
 
 
 
The convergence of the infinite depth interaction method is similar to
 
that of the finite depth method. Generally, it can be said that the
 
greater the water depth in the finite depth method the poorer its
 
performance. Since bodies in the water can change the water depth
 
which is required to allow the water to be approximated as infinitely
 
deep (ice floes for example) it is recommendable to use the infinite
 
depth method if the water depth may be considered
 
infinite. Furthermore, the infinite depth method requires the infinite
 
depth single diffraction solutions which are easier to
 
compute than the finite depth solutions.
 
It is also possible that the
 
convergence of the infinite depth method may be further improved
 
by a novel to optimisation of the discretisation of the continuous variable.</math>
 

Latest revision as of 10:24, 2 May 2010

Introduction

This is an interaction theory which provides the exact solution (i.e. it is not based on a Wide Spacing Approximation). The theory uses the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion and Graf's Addition Theorem to represent the potential in local coordinates. The incident and scattered potential of each body are then related by the associated Diffraction Transfer Matrix. Interaction Theory for Cylinders presents a simplified version for cylinders.

The basic idea is as follows: The scattered potential of each body is represented in the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion associated with the local coordinates centred at the mean centre position of the body. Using Graf's Addition Theorem, the scattered potential of all bodies (given in their local coordinates) can be mapped to an incident potential associated with the coordinates of all other bodies. Doing this, the incident potential of each body (which is given by the ambient incident potential plus the scattered potentials of all other bodies) is given in the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion associated with its local coordinates. Using the Diffraction Transfer Matrix, which relates the incident and scattered potential of each body in isolation, a system of equations for the coefficients of the scattered potentials of all bodies is obtained.

The theory is described in Kagemoto and Yue 1986 and in Peter and Meylan 2004.

The derivation of the theory in Infinite Depth is also presented, see Kagemoto and Yue Interaction Theory for Infinite Depth.

Equations of Motion

The problem consists of [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] bodies [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] with immersed body surface [math]\displaystyle{ \Gamma_j }[/math]. Each body is subject to the Standard Linear Wave Scattering Problem and the particluar equations of motion for each body (e.g. rigid, or freely floating) can be different for each body. It is a Frequency Domain Problem with frequency [math]\displaystyle{ \omega }[/math]. The solution is exact, up to the restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any other body. To simplify notation, [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{y} = (x,y,z) }[/math] always denotes a point in the water, which is assumed to be of Finite Depth [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math], while [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{x} }[/math] always denotes a point of the undisturbed water surface assumed at [math]\displaystyle{ z=0 }[/math].

The equations are the following

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \Delta\phi &=0, &-h\lt z\lt 0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \Omega \\ \partial_z\phi &= 0, &z=-h, \\ \partial_z \phi &= \alpha \phi, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \end{align} }[/math]


(note that the last expression can be obtained from combining the expressions:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \partial_z \phi &= -\mathrm{i} \omega \zeta, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \\ \mathrm{i} \omega \phi &= g\zeta, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \end{align} }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha = \omega^2/g \, }[/math])

[math]\displaystyle{ \partial_n\phi = \mathcal{L}\phi, \quad \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega_B, }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{L} }[/math] is a linear operator which relates the normal and potential on the body surface through the physics of the body.

The Sommerfeld Radiation Condition is also imposed.

Eigenfunction expansion of the potential

Each body is subject to an incident potential and moves in response to this incident potential to produce a scattered potential. Each of these is expanded using the Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion The scattered potential of a body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be expressed as

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^\mathrm{S} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} f_m(z) \sum_{\mu = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m \mu}^j K_\mu (k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\mu \theta_j}, }[/math]

with discrete coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ A_{m \mu}^j }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ (r_j,\theta_j,z) }[/math] are cylindrical polar coordinates centered at each body

[math]\displaystyle{ f_m(z) = \frac{\cos k_m (z+h)}{\cos k_m h}. }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ k_m }[/math] are found from [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] by the Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface

[math]\displaystyle{ \alpha + k_m \tan k_m h = 0\,. }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ k_0 }[/math] is the imaginary root with negative imaginary part and [math]\displaystyle{ k_m }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ m\gt 0 }[/math], are given the positive real roots ordered with increasing size.

The incident potential upon body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be also be expanded in regular cylindrical eigenfunctions,

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^\mathrm{I} (r_j,\theta_j,z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^j I_\nu (k_n r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_j}, }[/math]

with discrete coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ D_{n\nu}^j }[/math]. In these expansions, [math]\displaystyle{ I_\nu }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ K_\nu }[/math] denote the modified : Bessel functions of the first and second kind, respectively, both of order [math]\displaystyle{ \nu }[/math].

Note that the term for [math]\displaystyle{ m =0 }[/math] or [math]\displaystyle{ n=0 }[/math] corresponds to the propagating modes while the terms for [math]\displaystyle{ m\geq 1 }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ n\geq 1 }[/math]) correspond to the evanescent modes.

Derivation of the system of equations

A system of equations for the unknown coefficients of the scattered wavefields of all bodies is developed. This system of equations is based on transforming the scattered potential of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] into an incident potential upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]). Doing this for all bodies simultaneously, and relating the incident and scattered potential for each body, a system of equations for the unknown coefficients is developed. Making use of the periodicity of the geometry and of the ambient incident wave, this system of equations can then be simplified.

The scattered potential [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} }[/math] of body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] needs to be represented in terms of the incident potential [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_l^{\mathrm{I}} }[/math] upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]. This can be accomplished by using Graf's Addition Theorem

[math]\displaystyle{ K_\tau(k_m r_j) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\tau (\theta_j-\varphi_{jl})} = \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} K_{\tau + \nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \, I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu (\pi - \theta_l + \varphi_{jl})}, \quad j \neq l, }[/math]

which is valid provided that [math]\displaystyle{ r_l \lt R_{jl} }[/math]. Here, [math]\displaystyle{ (R_{jl},\varphi_{jl}) }[/math] are the polar coordinates of the mean centre position of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_{l} }[/math] in the local coordinates of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_{j} }[/math].

The limitation [math]\displaystyle{ r_l \lt R_{jl} }[/math] only requires that the escribed cylinder of each body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] does not enclose any other origin [math]\displaystyle{ O_j }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]). However, the expansion of the scattered and incident potential in cylindrical eigenfunctions is only valid outside the escribed cylinder of each body. Therefore the condition that the escribed cylinder of each body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] does not enclose any other origin [math]\displaystyle{ O_j }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ j \neq l }[/math]) is superseded by the more rigorous restriction that the escribed cylinder of each body may not contain any other body.

Making use of the eigenfunction expansion as well as Graf's Addition Theorem, the scattered potential of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can be expressed in terms of the incident potential upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] as

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z) = \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\tau = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} (-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau-\nu) \varphi_{jl}} }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ = \sum_{m=0}^\infty f_m(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} \Big[ \sum_{\tau = - \infty}^{\infty} A_{m\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau-\nu} (k_m R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_m r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. }[/math]

The ambient incident wavefield [math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{In}} }[/math] can also be expanded in the eigenfunctions corresponding to the incident wavefield upon [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math]. Let [math]\displaystyle{ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} }[/math] denote the coefficients of this ambient incident wavefield in the incoming eigenfunction expansion for [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] (cf. the example in Cylindrical Eigenfunction Expansion).

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. }[/math]

The total incident wavefield upon body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_j }[/math] can now be expressed as

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_l^{\mathrm{I}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) = \phi^{\mathrm{In}}(r_l,\theta_l,z) + \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \, \phi_j^{\mathrm{S}} (r_l,\theta_l,z) }[/math]

This allows us to write

[math]\displaystyle{ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = - \infty}^{\infty} D_{n\nu}^l I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l} }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ = \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_n(z) \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} \Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big] I_\nu (k_n r_l) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\nu \theta_l}. }[/math]

It therefore follows that

[math]\displaystyle{ D_{n\nu}^l = \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau - \nu) \varphi_{jl}} }[/math]

Final Equations

The scattered and incident potential of each body [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_l }[/math] can be related by the Diffraction Transfer Matrix acting in the following way,

[math]\displaystyle{ A_{m \mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{m n \mu \nu}^l D_{n\nu}^l. }[/math]

The substitution of this into the equation for relating the coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ D_{n\nu}^l }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ A_{m \mu}^l }[/math]gives the required equations to determine the coefficients of the scattered wavefields of all bodies,

[math]\displaystyle{ A_{m\mu}^l = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{\nu = -\infty}^{\infty} B_{mn\mu\nu}^l \Big[ \tilde{D}_{n\nu}^{l} + \sum_{j=1,j \neq l}^{N} \sum_{\tau = -\infty}^{\infty} A_{n\tau}^j (-1)^\nu K_{\tau - \nu} (k_n R_{jl}) \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}(\tau -\nu) \varphi_{jl}} \Big], }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ m \in \mathbb{N} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ \mu \in \mathbb{Z} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ l=1,\dots,N }[/math].