Difference between revisions of "Wave Momentum Flux"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
We may recast the rate of change of the momentum (<math> \equiv \, </math> momentum flux) in the form | We may recast the rate of change of the momentum (<math> \equiv \, </math> momentum flux) in the form | ||
− | <center><math> \frac{d\ | + | <center><math> \frac{d\overrightarrow{M(t)}}{dt} = - \rho \iiint_V(t) [ \nabla ( \frac{P}{\rho} + g Z ) + ( \overrightarrow{V} \cdot \nabla ) \overrightarrow{V} ] dV + \rho \oint_{s(t)} \overrightarrow{V} U_n dS </math></center> |
So far <math> V(t)\, </math> is and arbitrary closed time dependent volume bounded by the time dependent surface <math> S(t)\, </math>. Here we need to invoke an important and complex vector theorem. | So far <math> V(t)\, </math> is and arbitrary closed time dependent volume bounded by the time dependent surface <math> S(t)\, </math>. Here we need to invoke an important and complex vector theorem. |
Revision as of 23:16, 16 February 2007
Momentum flux in potential flow
by virtue of the transport theorem
Invoking Euler's equations in inviscid flow
We may recast the rate of change of the momentum ([math]\displaystyle{ \equiv \, }[/math] momentum flux) in the form
So far [math]\displaystyle{ V(t)\, }[/math] is and arbitrary closed time dependent volume bounded by the time dependent surface [math]\displaystyle{ S(t)\, }[/math]. Here we need to invoke an important and complex vector theorem.
Recall from the proof of Bernoulli's equation that:
By virtue of Gauss's vector theorem:
where in potential flow: [math]\displaystyle{ \overrightarrow{V} = \nabla \Phi \, }[/math].
In potential flow it can be shown that:
Proof left as an exercise! Just prove that for [math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2 \Phi = 0 \, }[/math];