Difference between revisions of "Wavemaker Theory"
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
with: | with: | ||
− | <center><math> \omega^2 = gK \tanh KH </math></center> | + | <center><math> \omega^2 = gK \tanh KH. \,</math></center> |
The second component potential <math>\psi\,</math> is by definition a decaying disturbance as <math> X \to \infty \, </math> and otherwise astisfies the following boundary value problem: | The second component potential <math>\psi\,</math> is by definition a decaying disturbance as <math> X \to \infty \, </math> and otherwise astisfies the following boundary value problem: |
Revision as of 09:52, 19 February 2007
A paddle with draft [math]\displaystyle{ D\, }[/math] is undergoing small amplitude horizontal oscillations with displacement
Where [math]\displaystyle{ \Pi\, }[/math] is assumed known and real. This excitation creates plane progressive waves with amplitude [math]\displaystyle{ A \, }[/math] down the tank. The principal objective of wavemaker theory is to determine [math]\displaystyle{ A \, }[/math] as a function of [math]\displaystyle{ \omega, \Pi \, }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ H \, }[/math].
Other types of wavemaker modes may be treated similarly.
In general, the wavemaker displacement at [math]\displaystyle{ X=0\, }[/math] may be written in the form
Where [math]\displaystyle{ \Pi(Z) \, }[/math] is a known function of [math]\displaystyle{ Z \, }[/math].
Let the total velocity potential be:
where
The first term is a velocity potential that represents a plane progressive regular wave down the tank with amplitude [math]\displaystyle{ A \, }[/math], yet unknown. Thus:
with:
The second component potential [math]\displaystyle{ \psi\, }[/math] is by definition a decaying disturbance as [math]\displaystyle{ X \to \infty \, }[/math] and otherwise astisfies the following boundary value problem: