Difference between revisions of "Wavemaker Theory"
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<center><math> \omega^2 = gK \tanh KH. \,</math></center> | <center><math> \omega^2 = gK \tanh KH. \,</math></center> | ||
− | The second component potential <math>\psi\,</math> is by definition a decaying disturbance as <math> X \to \infty \, </math> and otherwise | + | The second component potential <math>\psi\,</math> is by definition a decaying disturbance as <math> X \to \infty \, </math> and otherwise satisfies the following boundary value problem: |
<center><math> \begin{cases} | <center><math> \begin{cases} | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
\end{cases} | \end{cases} | ||
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The condition on the wavemaker <math> (X=0) \, </math> is yet to be enforced. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that unlike <math> \phi_\omega, \psi </math> is not representing a propagating wave down the tank so it is called a non-wavelike mode. Such modes do exist as will be shown below. On the wavemaker <math> (X=0) \, </math> the horizontal velocity due to <math> \phi_\omega\, </math> and that due to <math> \psi\,</math> must sum to the forcing velocity due to <math> \xi(t) \, </math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Noting that <math> \phi_\omega \approx e^{-iKX} \cosh K(Z+H) \, </math> we will try <math> \phi \approx e^{-\lambda x} \cos \lambda (Z+H} \,</math>. Its conjugate which satisfies the condition of vanishing value as <math> X \to \infty </math> for <math> \lambda > 0 </math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <u> Laplace </u>: |
Revision as of 10:01, 19 February 2007
A paddle with draft [math]\displaystyle{ D\, }[/math] is undergoing small amplitude horizontal oscillations with displacement
Where [math]\displaystyle{ \Pi\, }[/math] is assumed known and real. This excitation creates plane progressive waves with amplitude [math]\displaystyle{ A \, }[/math] down the tank. The principal objective of wavemaker theory is to determine [math]\displaystyle{ A \, }[/math] as a function of [math]\displaystyle{ \omega, \Pi \, }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ H \, }[/math].
Other types of wavemaker modes may be treated similarly.
In general, the wavemaker displacement at [math]\displaystyle{ X=0\, }[/math] may be written in the form
Where [math]\displaystyle{ \Pi(Z) \, }[/math] is a known function of [math]\displaystyle{ Z \, }[/math].
Let the total velocity potential be:
where
The first term is a velocity potential that represents a plane progressive regular wave down the tank with amplitude [math]\displaystyle{ A \, }[/math], yet unknown. Thus:
with:
The second component potential [math]\displaystyle{ \psi\, }[/math] is by definition a decaying disturbance as [math]\displaystyle{ X \to \infty \, }[/math] and otherwise satisfies the following boundary value problem:
The condition on the wavemaker [math]\displaystyle{ (X=0) \, }[/math] is yet to be enforced.
Note that unlike [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_\omega, \psi }[/math] is not representing a propagating wave down the tank so it is called a non-wavelike mode. Such modes do exist as will be shown below. On the wavemaker [math]\displaystyle{ (X=0) \, }[/math] the horizontal velocity due to [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_\omega\, }[/math] and that due to [math]\displaystyle{ \psi\, }[/math] must sum to the forcing velocity due to [math]\displaystyle{ \xi(t) \, }[/math].
Noting that [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_\omega \approx e^{-iKX} \cosh K(Z+H) \, }[/math] we will try [math]\displaystyle{ \phi \approx e^{-\lambda x} \cos \lambda (Z+H} \, }[/math]. Its conjugate which satisfies the condition of vanishing value as [math]\displaystyle{ X \to \infty }[/math] for [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda \gt 0 }[/math].
Laplace :