Difference between revisions of "Wave Scattering By A Vertical Circular Cylinder"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
This important flow accepts a closed-form analytical solution for arbitrary values of the wavelength <math>\lambda\,</math>. This was shown to be the case by McCamy-Fuchs using separation of variables | This important flow accepts a closed-form analytical solution for arbitrary values of the wavelength <math>\lambda\,</math>. This was shown to be the case by McCamy-Fuchs using separation of variables | ||
− | <center><math> \Phi_I = \ | + | <center><math> \Phi_I = \mathrm{Re} \left\{\phi_I e^{i\omega t} \right \} \,</math></center> |
<center><math> \phi_I = \frac{i g A}{\omega} \frac{\cosh K(Z+H)}{\cosh K H} e^{-iKX} </math></center> | <center><math> \phi_I = \frac{i g A}{\omega} \frac{\cosh K(Z+H)}{\cosh K H} e^{-iKX} </math></center> | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Here we make use of the familiar identity: | Here we make use of the familiar identity: | ||
− | <center><math> e^{-iKR\cos\theta} = \sum_{m=0}^{infty} \epsilon_m J_m ( K R ) \cos m \theta </math></center> | + | <center><math> e^{-iKR\cos\theta} = \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \epsilon_m J_m ( K R ) \cos m \theta </math></center> |
<center><math> \epsilon_m = \begin{Bmatrix} | <center><math> \epsilon_m = \begin{Bmatrix} | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
Try: | Try: | ||
− | <center><math> \psi(R,\theta) = \sum_{m=0}^{infty} A_m F_m ( K R ) \cos m \theta \, </math></center> | + | <center><math> \psi(R,\theta) = \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} A_m F_m ( K R ) \cos m \theta \, </math></center> |
Upon substitution in Helmholtz's equation we obtain: | Upon substitution in Helmholtz's equation we obtain: |
Revision as of 15:56, 9 April 2009
Wave and Wave Body Interactions | |
---|---|
Current Chapter | Wave Scattering By A Vertical Circular Cylinder |
Next Chapter | Forward-Speed Ship Wave Flows |
Previous Chapter | Long Wavelength Approximations |
McCamy-Fuchs analytical solution of the scattering of regular waves by a vertical circular cylinder
This important flow accepts a closed-form analytical solution for arbitrary values of the wavelength [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\, }[/math]. This was shown to be the case by McCamy-Fuchs using separation of variables
Let the diffraction potential be:
- For [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_7\, }[/math] to satisfy the 3D Laplace equation, it is easy to show that [math]\displaystyle{ \psi\, }[/math] must satisfy the Helmholtz equation:
In polar coordinates:
The Helmholtz equation takes the form:
On the cylinder:
or
Here we make use of the familiar identity:
Try:
Upon substitution in Helmholtz's equation we obtain:
This is the Bessel equation of order m accepting as solutions linear combinations of the Bessel functions
The proper linear combination in the present problem is suggested by the radiation condition that [math]\displaystyle{ \psi\, }[/math] must satisfy:
As [math]\displaystyle{ R \to \infty\, }[/math]:
Also as [math]\displaystyle{ R \to \infty\, }[/math]:
Hence the Hankel function:
Satisfies the far field condition required by [math]\displaystyle{ \psi(R,\theta) \, }[/math]. So we set:
With the constants [math]\displaystyle{ A_m \, }[/math] to be determined. The cylinder condition requires:
It follows that:
or:
where [math]\displaystyle{ (')\, }[/math] denotes derivatives with respect to the argument. The solution for the total velocity potential follows in the form
And the total original potential follows:
In the limit as [math]\displaystyle{ H \to \infty \quad \frac{\cosh K (Z+H)}{K H} \longrightarrow e^{K Z} \, }[/math] and the series expansion solution survives.
Surge exciting force
The total complex potential, incident and scattered was derived above. The hydrodynamic pressure follows from Bernoulli:
The surge exciting force is given by
Simple algebra in this case of water of infinite depth leads to the expression.
Ocean Wave Interaction with Ships and Offshore Energy Systems