Difference between revisions of "Long Wavelength Approximations"
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
The proof is essentially based on a phasing argument. Relative to the reference frame, | The proof is essentially based on a phasing argument. Relative to the reference frame, | ||
− | <center><math> \Phi_I = \mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{i g A}{\omega} e^{ | + | <center><math> \Phi_I = \mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{i g A}{\omega} e^{kz-ikx + i\omega t} \right\} \,</math></center> |
Expressing the incident wave relative to the local frames by introducing the phase factors, | Expressing the incident wave relative to the local frames by introducing the phase factors, | ||
− | <center><math> \mathbf{P}_i = e^{- | + | <center><math> \mathbf{P}_i = e^{-ikx_i} </math></center> |
and letting | and letting | ||
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
Then relative to the i-th leg, | Then relative to the i-th leg, | ||
− | <center><math> \Phi_I^{(i)} = \mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{ i g A}{\omega} e^{ | + | <center><math> \Phi_I^{(i)} = \mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{ i g A}{\omega} e^{kz - ik\xi_i + i\omega t} \mathbf{P}_i \right\} \quad i=1,\cdots,N </math></center> |
Ignoring interactions between legs, which is a good approximation in long waves, the total exciting force on an n-cylinder platform is | Ignoring interactions between legs, which is a good approximation in long waves, the total exciting force on an n-cylinder platform is | ||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
=== Surge exciting force on a 2D section === | === Surge exciting force on a 2D section === | ||
− | <center><math> \Phi_I = \mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{ i g A}{\omega} e^{ | + | <center><math> \Phi_I = \mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{ i g A}{\omega} e^{kz-ikx+i\omega t} \right\} \,</math></center> |
− | <center><math> u=\mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{ i g A}{\omega} (- i | + | <center><math> u=\mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{ i g A}{\omega} (- i k ) e^{kz-ikx+i\omega t} \right\} \,</math></center> |
<center><math> \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{ i g A}{\omega} \left(- i \frac{\omega^2}{g} \right) (i\omega) e^{i\omega t} \right\}_{x=0, z=0} \,</math></center> | <center><math> \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \mathrm{Re} \left\{ \frac{ i g A}{\omega} \left(- i \frac{\omega^2}{g} \right) (i\omega) e^{i\omega t} \right\}_{x=0, z=0} \,</math></center> | ||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
where <math>A_w\,</math> is the body water plane area in 2D or 3D. <math>A\,</math> is the wave amplitude. This can be shown to be the leading order contribution from the Froude-Krylov force: | where <math>A_w\,</math> is the body water plane area in 2D or 3D. <math>A\,</math> is the wave amplitude. This can be shown to be the leading order contribution from the Froude-Krylov force: | ||
− | <center><math> \mathbf{X}_3^{FK} = \rho g A \iint_{S_B} e^{ | + | <center><math> \mathbf{X}_3^{FK} = \rho g A \iint_{S_B} e^{kz-ikx} n_3 \mathrm{d}S \,</math></center> |
Using the Taylor series expansion, | Using the Taylor series expansion, | ||
− | <center><math> e^{ | + | <center><math> e^{kz-ikx} = 1 + ( kz - ikx ) + O ( kB )^2 \,</math></center> |
It is easy to verify that <math>\mathbf{X}_3 \to \rho g A A_w \,</math>. | It is easy to verify that <math>\mathbf{X}_3 \to \rho g A A_w \,</math>. | ||
− | The scattering contribution is of order <math> | + | The scattering contribution is of order <math> kB\,</math>. For submerged bodies, <math> \mathbf{X}_3^{FK}=O(kB)\,</math>. |
----- | ----- |
Revision as of 11:56, 11 December 2009
Wave and Wave Body Interactions | |
---|---|
Current Chapter | Long Wavelength Approximations |
Next Chapter | Wave Scattering By A Vertical Circular Cylinder |
Previous Chapter | Added-Mass, Damping Coefficients And Exciting Forces |
Introduction
Very frequently the length of ambient waves [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda \, }[/math] is large compared to the dimension of floating bodies. For example the length of a wave with period [math]\displaystyle{ T=10 \mbox{s}\, }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda \simeq T^2 + \frac{T^2}{2} \simeq 150\mbox{m} \, }[/math]. The beam of a ship with length [math]\displaystyle{ L=100\mbox{m}\, }[/math] can be [math]\displaystyle{ 20\mbox{m}\, }[/math] as is the case for the diameter of the leg of an offshore platform.
GI Taylor's formula
Consider a flow field given by
[math]\displaystyle{ U(x,t):\ \mbox{Velocity of ambient unidirectional flow} \, }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ P(x,t):\ \mbox{Pressure corresponding to} \ U(x,t) \, }[/math]
In the absence of viscous effects and to leading order for [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda \gg B \, }[/math]:
where
Derivation using Euler's equations
An alternative form of GI Taylor's formula for a fixed body follows from Euler's equations:
Thus:
If the body is also translating in the x-direction with displacement [math]\displaystyle{ x_1(t)\, }[/math] then the total force becomes
Often, when the ambient velocity [math]\displaystyle{ U\, }[/math] is arising from plane progressive waves, [math]\displaystyle{ \left| U \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right| = 0(A^2) \, }[/math] and is omitted. Note that [math]\displaystyle{ U\, }[/math] does not include disturbance effects due to the body.
Applications of GI Taylor's formula in wave-body interactions
Archimedean hydrostatics
So Archimedes' formula is a special case of GI Taylor when there is no flow. This offers an intuitive meaning to the term that includes the body displacement.
Regular waves over a circle fixed under the free surface
So the horizontal force on the circle is:
Thus:
We can derive the vertical force along very similar lines. It is simply [math]\displaystyle{ 90^\circ\, }[/math] out of phase relative to [math]\displaystyle{ F_x\, }[/math] with the same modulus.
Horizontal force on a fixed circular cylinder of draft [math]\displaystyle{ T\, }[/math]
This case arises frequently in wave interactions with floating offshore platforms.
Here we will evaluate [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} \, }[/math] on the axis of the platform and use a strip wise integration to evaluate the total hydrodynamic force.
The differential horizontal force over a strip [math]\displaystyle{ \mathrm{d} z \, }[/math] at a depth [math]\displaystyle{ z \, }[/math] becomes:
The total horizontal force over a truncated cylinder of draft [math]\displaystyle{ T\, }[/math] becomes:
This is a very useful and practical result. It provides an estimate of the surge exciting force on one leg of a possibly multi-leg platform as [math]\displaystyle{ T \to \infty; \quad \frac{1-e^{-kT}}{k} \to \frac{1}{k}\, }[/math]
Horizontal force on multiple vertical cylinders in any arrangement
The proof is essentially based on a phasing argument. Relative to the reference frame,
Expressing the incident wave relative to the local frames by introducing the phase factors,
and letting
Then relative to the i-th leg,
Ignoring interactions between legs, which is a good approximation in long waves, the total exciting force on an n-cylinder platform is
The above expression gives the complex amplitude of the force with [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{X}_1\, }[/math] given in the single cylinder case.
The above technique may be easily extended to estimate the Sway force and Yaw moment on n-cylinders with little extra effort.
Surge exciting force on a 2D section
If the body section is a circle with radius [math]\displaystyle{ a\, }[/math],
So in long waves, the surge exciting force is equally divided between the Froude-Krylov and the diffraction components. This is not the case for Heave!
Heave exciting force on a surface piercing section
In long waves, the leading order effect in the exciting force is the hydrostatic contribution
where [math]\displaystyle{ A_w\, }[/math] is the body water plane area in 2D or 3D. [math]\displaystyle{ A\, }[/math] is the wave amplitude. This can be shown to be the leading order contribution from the Froude-Krylov force:
Using the Taylor series expansion,
It is easy to verify that [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{X}_3 \to \rho g A A_w \, }[/math].
The scattering contribution is of order [math]\displaystyle{ kB\, }[/math]. For submerged bodies, [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbf{X}_3^{FK}=O(kB)\, }[/math].
This article is based on the MIT open course notes and the original article can be found here
Ocean Wave Interaction with Ships and Offshore Energy Systems