Linear and Second-Order Wave Theory

We saw in Conservation Laws And Boundary Conditions that the potential flow model for wave progation is given Laplaces equation plus the free-surface condtions. In this section we present the linear and second order theory for these equations. The linear theory is valid for small wave heights and the second order theory is an improvement on this. However, neither of these theories work for very steep waves and of course the potential theory breaks down once the wave begins to break and completely different methods are required in this situation.

Linerization of Free-surface Conditions

We use perturbation theory to expand the solution as follows

[math]\displaystyle{ \zeta = \epsilon\zeta_1 + \epsilon^2 \zeta_2 + \epsilon^3\zeta_3 + \cdots }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \Phi = \epsilon\Phi_1 + \epsilon^2\Phi_2 + \epsilon3\Phi_3 + \cdots }[/math]

We are essentially assuming that the displacement and potential are both small, i.e. there variation form zero is small. Of course there is some ambiguity about what this smallness means but essentially it requires the spatial derivitive to be smaller than the values of the functions. We then derive the boundary value problem for [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon_i,\Phi_i }[/math]. Rarely we need to go beyond [math]\displaystyle{ i = 3 }[/math]. In this section we will only derive the free-surface conditions up to second order. Remember that [math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2 Phi_i =0 }[/math] for all [math]\displaystyle{ i }[/math]

We expand the kinematic and dynamic free surface conditions about the [math]\displaystyle{ Z=0 }[/math] plane and derive statements for the unknown pairs [math]\displaystyle{ (\Phi_1,\zeta_1 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ (\Phi_2, \zeta_2) }[/math] at [math]\displaystyle{ Z=0 }[/math]. The same technique can be used to linearize the body boundary condition at [math]\displaystyle{ U=0 }[/math] (zero speed) and [math]\displaystyle{ U\gt 0 }[/math] (forward speed).

Kinematic condition

[math]\displaystyle{ \left ( \frac{\partial \zeta}{\partial t} + \nabla \Phi \cdot \nabla \zeta \right )_{Z=\zeta} = \left ( \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial Z} \right )_{Z=\zeta} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \left( \frac{\partial\zeta}{\partial t} + \nabla \Phi \cdot \nabla \zeta \right)_{Z=0} + \zeta \frac{\partial}{\partial Z} \left( \frac{\partial\zeta}{\partial t} + \nabla \Phi \cdot \nabla \zeta \right)_{Z=0} + \cdots }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ = \left( \frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial Z} \right)_{Z=0} + \zeta \left( \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial Z^2} \right)_{Z=0} + \cdots }[/math]

Introduce:

[math]\displaystyle{ \left . \begin{matrix} \zeta = \zeta_1 + \zeta_2 + \cdots \\ \Phi = \Phi_1 + \Phi_2 + \cdots \end{matrix} \right \} \mbox{And keep terms of} \ O(\varepsilon), \ O(\varepsilon^2), \ \cdots }[/math]

Dynamic condition

[math]\displaystyle{ \zeta (X,Y,t) = -\frac{1}{g} \left( \frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2} \nabla\Phi \cdot \nabla\Phi \right)_{Z=\zeta} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \left . \begin{matrix} \zeta = \frac{1}{g} \left( \frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2} \nabla\Phi \cdot \nabla\Phi \right)_{Z=0}\\ \frac{1}{g} \zeta \frac{\partial}{\partial Z} \left( \frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2} \nabla\Phi \cdot \nabla\Phi \right)_{Z=0} + \cdots \end{matrix} \right \} \begin{matrix} \zeta = \zeta_1 +\zeta_2 + \cdots \\ \Phi = \Phi_1 + \Phi_2 + \cdots \end{matrix} }[/math]

Linear problem

The linear problem is the [math]\displaystyle{ O(\varepsilon) }[/math] problem derived by equating the terms which are proportional to [math]\displaystyle{ \epsilon }[/math].

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\partial\zeta_1}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial\Phi_1}{\partial Z} , \ Z=0; \qquad \mbox{Kinematic} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \zeta_1 = -\frac{1}{g} \frac{\partial\Phi_1}{\partial t}, \ Z=0; \qquad \mbox{Dynamic} }[/math]

Pressure from Bernoulli, [math]\displaystyle{ \omega }[/math] constant terms set equal to zero, at a fixed point in the fluid domain at [math]\displaystyle{ \vec{X}=(X,Y,Z) }[/math] is given by:

[math]\displaystyle{ P = - \rho \left( \frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2} \nabla\Phi \cdots \nabla\Phi + gZ \right); \ \Phi = \Phi_1 + \Phi_2 + \cdots }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ P = P_0 + P_1 + P_2 \, }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ P_0 = -\rho g Z ; \ \mbox{Hydrestatic} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ P_1 = - \rho \frac{\partial\Phi_1}{\partial t} ; \ Linear }[/math]

Eliminating [math]\displaystyle{ \zeta_1 }[/math] from the kinematic and dynamic free surface conditions, we obtain the classical linear free surface condition:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{cases} \frac{\partial^2\Phi_1}{\partial t^2} + g \frac{\partial\Phi_1}{\partial Z} = 0, \qquad Z=0\\ \zeta_1 = - \frac{1}{g} \frac{\partial\Phi_1}{\partial t}, \qquad Z=0 \end{cases} }[/math]

With:

[math]\displaystyle{ P_1 = - \rho \frac{\partial\Phi_1}{\partial t}, \qquad \mbox{At some fixed point} \ \vec X }[/math]

Note that on [math]\displaystyle{ Z=0, \ P_1 \ne 0 }[/math] in fact it can obtained from the expressions above in the form

[math]\displaystyle{ P_1 = -\rho g \zeta_1, \qquad Z=0 }[/math]

So linear theory states that the linear perturbation pressure on the [math]\displaystyle{ Z=0 \, }[/math] plane due to a surface wave disturbance is equal to the positive (negative) "hydrostatic" pressure induced by the positive (negative) wave elevation [math]\displaystyle{ \zeta_1 \, }[/math].

Second-order problem: [math]\displaystyle{ O(\epsilon^2) }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ \bullet \quad \frac{\partial\zeta_2}{\partial t} + \nabla\Phi_1 \cdot \nabla\zeta_1 = \frac{\partial\Phi_2}{\partial Z} + \zeta_1 \frac{\partial^2 \Phi_1}{\partial Z^2}, \quad Z=0 \qquad \mbox{Kinematic condition} }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ \bullet \quad \zeta_2 = - \frac{1}{g} \left( \frac{\partial\Phi_2}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2} \nabla\Phi_1 \cdot \nabla\Phi_1 \right)_{Z=0} - \frac{1}{g} \zeta_1 \frac{\partial^2\Phi_1}{\partial Z \partial t}, \quad Z=0 \qquad \mbox{Dynamic condition} }[/math]

Alternatively, the known linear terms may be moved in the right-hand side as forcing functions, leading to:

Kinematic second-order condition:

[math]\displaystyle{ \bullet \quad \frac{\partial\zeta_2}{\partial t} - \frac{\partial\Phi_2}{\partial Z} = \zeta_1 \frac{\partial^2 \Phi_1}{\partial Z^2} - \nabla\Phi_1 \cdot \nabla\zeta_1; \quad Z=0 }[/math]

Dynamic second-order condition:

[math]\displaystyle{ \bullet \quad \zeta_2 + \frac{1}{g} \frac{\partial\Phi_2}{\partial t} = - \frac{1}{g} \left( \frac{1}{2} \nabla\Phi_1 \cdot \nabla\Phi_1 + \zeta_1 \frac{\partial^2\Phi_1}{\partial Z \partial t} \right)_{Z=0} }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ P_2 = -\rho \left( \frac{\partial\Phi_2}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2} \nabla\Phi_1 \cdot \nabla\Phi_1 \right); \quad \mbox{at} \ \vec X. }[/math]

The very attractive feature of second order surface wave theory is that it allows the prior solution of the linear problem which is often possible analytically and numerically.

The linear solution is then used as a forcing function for the solution of the second order problem. This is often possible analytically and in most cases numerically in the absence or presence of bodies.

Linear and second-order theories are very appropriate to use for the modeling of surface waves as stochastic processes.

Both theories are very useful in practice as will be demonstrated in many contexts in the present course, particucarly in conneltion with wave-body interactions.

Ocean Wave Interaction with Ships and Offshore Energy Systems