Difference between revisions of "Wave Scattering By A Vertical Circular Cylinder"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<center><math> \Phi_I = \mathrm{Re} \left\{\phi_I e^{i\omega t} \right \} \,</math></center> | <center><math> \Phi_I = \mathrm{Re} \left\{\phi_I e^{i\omega t} \right \} \,</math></center> | ||
− | <center><math> \phi_I = \frac{i g A}{\omega} \frac{\cosh K( | + | <center><math> \phi_I = \frac{i g A}{\omega} \frac{\cosh K(z+h)}{\cosh K h} e^{-iKx} </math></center> |
Let the diffraction potential be | Let the diffraction potential be | ||
− | <center><math> \phi_7 = \frac{i g A}{\omega} \frac{\cosh K( | + | <center><math> \phi_7 = \frac{i g A}{\omega} \frac{\cosh K(z+h)}{\cos K h} \psi(x,y) </math></center> |
For <math>\phi_7\,</math> to satisfy the 3D Laplace equation, it is easy to show that <math>\psi\,</math> must satisfy the Helmholtz equation: | For <math>\phi_7\,</math> to satisfy the 3D Laplace equation, it is easy to show that <math>\psi\,</math> must satisfy the Helmholtz equation: | ||
− | <center><math> \left( \frac{\partial^2}{\partial | + | <center><math> \left( \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + K^2 \right) \psi = 0\, </math></center> |
In polar coordinates: | In polar coordinates: | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
or | or | ||
− | <center><math> \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial R} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial R} \left( e^{- | + | <center><math> \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial R} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial R} \left( e^{-iKx} \right) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial R} \left( e^{-iKE\cos R} \right) </math></center> |
Here we make use of the familiar identity: | Here we make use of the familiar identity: | ||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
And the total original potential follows: | And the total original potential follows: | ||
− | <center><math> \phi = \phi_I + \phi_7 = \frac{i g A}{\omega} \frac{\cosh K ( | + | <center><math> \phi = \phi_I + \phi_7 = \frac{i g A}{\omega} \frac{\cosh K (z+h)}{\cosh K h } (\psi+x) (r,\theta) </math></center> |
− | In the limit as <math> | + | In the limit as <math> h \to \infty \quad \frac{\cosh K (z+h)}{K h} \longrightarrow e^{K z} \,</math> and the series expansion solution survives. |
== Surge exciting force == | == Surge exciting force == |
Revision as of 03:56, 27 May 2009
Wave and Wave Body Interactions | |
---|---|
Current Chapter | Wave Scattering By A Vertical Circular Cylinder |
Next Chapter | Forward-Speed Ship Wave Flows |
Previous Chapter | Long Wavelength Approximations |
McCamy-Fuchs analytical solution of the scattering of regular waves by a vertical circular cylinder
This important flow accepts a closed-form analytical solution for arbitrary values of the wavelength [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\, }[/math]. This was shown to be the case by McCamy and Fuchs 1954 using separation of variables
Let the diffraction potential be
For [math]\displaystyle{ \phi_7\, }[/math] to satisfy the 3D Laplace equation, it is easy to show that [math]\displaystyle{ \psi\, }[/math] must satisfy the Helmholtz equation:
In polar coordinates:
The Helmholtz equation takes the form:
On the cylinder:
or
Here we make use of the familiar identity:
Try:
Upon substitution in Helmholtz's equation we obtain:
This is the Bessel equation of order m accepting as solutions linear combinations of the Bessel functions
The proper linear combination in the present problem is suggested by the radiation condition that [math]\displaystyle{ \psi\, }[/math] must satisfy:
As [math]\displaystyle{ R \to \infty\, }[/math]:
Also as [math]\displaystyle{ R \to \infty\, }[/math]:
Hence the Hankel function:
Satisfies the far field condition required by [math]\displaystyle{ \psi(R,\theta) \, }[/math]. So we set:
with the constants [math]\displaystyle{ A_m \, }[/math] to be determined. The cylinder condition requires:
It follows that:
or:
where [math]\displaystyle{ (')\, }[/math] denotes derivatives with respect to the argument. The solution for the total velocity potential follows in the form
And the total original potential follows:
In the limit as [math]\displaystyle{ h \to \infty \quad \frac{\cosh K (z+h)}{K h} \longrightarrow e^{K z} \, }[/math] and the series expansion solution survives.
Surge exciting force
The total complex potential, incident and scattered was derived above. The hydrodynamic pressure follows from Bernoulli:
The surge exciting force is given by
Simple algebra in this case of water of infinite depth leads to the expression.
Ocean Wave Interaction with Ships and Offshore Energy Systems