Two-Dimensional Floating Elastic Plate
Equations of Motion
When considering a two dimensional problem, the [math]\displaystyle{ y }[/math] variable is dropped and the plate is regarded as a beam. There are various beam theories that can be used to describe the motion of the beam. The simplest theory is the Bernoulli-Euler Beam which is commonly used in the two dimensional hydroelastic analysis. Other beam theories include the Timoshenko Beam theory and Reddy-Bickford Beam theory where shear deformation of higher order is considered.
For a Bernoulli-Euler beam on the surface of the water, the equation of motion is given
by the following
where [math]\displaystyle{ D }[/math] is the flexural rigidity, [math]\displaystyle{ \rho_i }[/math] is the density of the beam, [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math] is the thickness of the beam (assumed constant), [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] is the pressure and [math]\displaystyle{ \eta }[/math] is the beam vertical displacement.
The edges of the plate satisfy the natural boundary condition (i.e. free-edge boundary conditions).
at the edges of the plate.
The pressure is given by the linearised Bernoulli equation at the wetted surface (assuming zero pressure at the surface), i.e.
[math]\displaystyle{ p = \rho g \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z} + \rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ \rho }[/math] is the water density and [math]\displaystyle{ g }[/math] is gravity, and [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] is the velocity potential. The velocity potential is governed by Laplace's equation through out the fluid domain subject to the free surface condition and the condition of no flow through the bottom surface. If we denote the beam-covered (or possible multiple beams covered) region of the fluid by [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] and the free surface by [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math] the equations of motion for the Frequency Domain Problem with frequency [math]\displaystyle{ \omega }[/math] for water of Finite Depth are the following. At the surface we have the dynamic condition
[math]\displaystyle{ D\frac{\partial^4 \eta}{\partial x^4} +\left(\rho g- \omega^2 \rho_i h \right)\eta = i\omega \rho \phi, \, z=0, \, x\in P }[/math]
and the kinematic condition
[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\partial\phi}{\partial z} = i\omega\eta }[/math]
The equation within the fluid is governed by Laplace's Equation
[math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2\phi =0 }[/math]
and we have the no-flow condition through the bottom boundary
[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z} = 0, \, z=-h }[/math]
(so we have a fluid of constant depth with the bottom surface at [math]\displaystyle{ z=-h }[/math] and the free surface or plate covered surface are at [math]\displaystyle{ z=0 }[/math]). [math]\displaystyle{ g }[/math] is the acceleration due to gravity, [math]\displaystyle{ \rho_i }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \rho }[/math] are the densities of the plate and the water respectively, [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ D }[/math] the thickness and flexural rigidity of the plate.
Energy Balance
An energy balence relation is derived in Evans and Davies 1968 which is simply a condition that the incident energy is equal to the sum of the radiated energy including both the energy in the water and the energy in the plate. If the properties of the first and last semi-infinite plates were identical, then this would be the familiar requirement that
However, when the first and last plates have different properties, then the energy balance condition becomes the following
where [math]\displaystyle{ D }[/math] is found by applying Green's theorem to [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] and its conjugate, Evans and Davies 1968 and is given by
The energy balance condition is useful to help check that the solution is not incorrect (it does not of course guarantee the solution is correct). The energy balance condition is surprisingly well satisfied by our solutions, for example with [math]\displaystyle{ M=20 }[/math] we can easily get ten decimal places.
Solution Methods
There are many different methods to solve the corresponding equations ranging from highly analytic such as the Wiener-Hopf to very numerical based on Eigenfunction Matching Method which are applicable and have advantages in different situations. We describe here some of the solutions which have been developed grouped by problem
Two Semi-Infinite Plates of Identical Properties
The simplest problem to consider is one where there are only two semi-infinite plates of identical properties separated by a crack. A related problem in acoustics was considered by Kouzov 1963 who used an integral representation of the problem to solve it explicitly using the Riemann-Hilbert technique. Recently the crack problem has been considered by Squire and Dixon 2000 and Williams and Squire 2002 using a Green function method applicable to infinitely deep water and they obtained simple expressions for the reflection and transmission coefficients. Squire and Dixon 2001 extended the single crack problem to a multiple crack problem in which the semi-infinite regions are separated by a region consisting of a finite number of plates of finite size with all plates having identical properties. Evans and Porter 2005 further considered the multiple crack problem for finitely deep water and provided an explicit solution which is described in Two Semi-Infinite Elastic Plates of Identical Properties
Two Semi-Infinite Plates of Different Properties
The next most simple problem is two semi-infinite plates of different properties. Often one of the plates is taken to be open water which makes the problem simpler. In general, the solution method developed for open water can be extended to two plates of different properties, the exception to this is the Residue Calculus solution which applies only when one of the semi-infinite regions is water.
Wiener-Hopf
The solution to the problem of two semi-infinite plates with different properties can be solved by the Wiener-Hopf method. The first work on this problem was by Evans and Davies 1968 but they did not actually develop the method sufficiently to be able to calculate the solution. The explicit solution was not found until the work of Chung and Fox 2002 and the Wiener-Hopf solution is described in Wiener-Hopf Elastic Plate Solution
Eigenfunction Matching Method
The eigenfunction matching solution was developed by Fox and Squire 1994 for a single semi-infinite plate and extended to plates of different properties by Barrett and Squire 1996. Essentially the solution is expanded on either side of the crack. The theory is described in Eigenfunction Matching Method for Floating Elastic Plates
Residue Calculus
The solution using Residue Calculus was developed by Linton and Chung 200?
Single Floating Plate
The problem of a single floating plate in two-dimensions was treated by Newman 1994, Meylan and Squire 1994 and Hermans 2003 using the Free-Surface Green Function, described in Green Function Methods for Floating Elastic Plates
Multiple Floating Plates
The most general problem consists of multiple floating plate. The methods which generalises to this are the Eigenfunction Matching Method for Floating Elastic Plates (Kohout et. al. 2006) and the Green Function Methods for Floating Elastic Plates (Hermans 2004).