Two-Dimensional Floating Elastic Plate
Two Dimensional Problem
Equations of Motion
When considering a two dimensional problem, the [math]\displaystyle{ y }[/math] variable is dropped and the plate is regarded as a beam. There are various beam theories that can be used to describe the motion of the beam. The simplest theory is the Bernoulli-Euler Beam which is commonly used in the two dimensional hydroelastic analysis. Other beam theories include the Timoshenko Beam theory and Reddy-Bickford Beam theory where shear deformation of higher order is considered.
For a Bernoulli-Euler beam on the surface of the water, the equation of motion is given
by the following
[math]\displaystyle{ D\frac{\partial^4 \eta}{\partial x^4} + \rho_i h \frac{\partial^2 \eta}{\partial t^2} = p }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ D }[/math] is the flexural rigidity, [math]\displaystyle{ \rho_i }[/math] is the density of the beam, [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math] is the thickness of the beam (assumed constant), [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] is the pressure and [math]\displaystyle{ \eta }[/math] is the beam vertical displacement.
The edges of the plate satisfy the natural boundary condition (i.e. free-edge boundary conditions).
[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\partial^2 \eta}{\partial x^2} = 0, \,\,\frac{\partial^3 \eta}{\partial x^3} = 0 }[/math]
at the edges of the plate.
The pressure is given by the linearised Bernoulli equation at the wetted surface (assuming zero pressure at the surface), i.e.
[math]\displaystyle{ p = \rho g \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z} + \rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ \rho }[/math] is the water density and [math]\displaystyle{ g }[/math] is gravity, and [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] is the velocity potential. The velocity potential is governed by Laplace's equation through out the fluid domain subject to the free surface condition and the condition of no flow through the bottom surface. If we denote the beam-covered (or possible multiple beams covered) region of the fluid by [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] and the free surface by [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math] the equations of motion for the Frequency Domain Problem with frequency [math]\displaystyle{ \omega }[/math] for water of Finite Depth are the following. At the surface we have the dynamic condition
[math]\displaystyle{ D\frac{\partial^4 \eta}{\partial x^4} +\left(\rho g- \omega^2 \rho_i h \right)\eta = i\omega \rho \phi, \, z=0, \, x\in P }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ 0= \rho g \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z} + i\omega \rho \phi, \, x\in F }[/math]
and the kinematic condition
[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\partial\phi}{\partial z} = i\omega\eta }[/math]
The equation within the fluid is governed by Laplace's Equation
[math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2\phi =0 }[/math]
and we have the no-flow condition through the bottom boundary
[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z} = 0, \, z=-h }[/math]
(so we have a fluid of constant depth with the bottom surface at [math]\displaystyle{ z=-h }[/math] and the free surface or plate covered surface are at [math]\displaystyle{ z=0 }[/math]). [math]\displaystyle{ g }[/math] is the acceleration due to gravity, [math]\displaystyle{ \rho_i }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \rho }[/math] are the densities of the plate and the water respectively, [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ D }[/math] the thickness and flexural rigidity of the plate.
Solution Methods
There are many different methods to solve the corresponding equations ranging from highly analytic such as the Wiener-Hopf to very numerical based on Eigenfunction Matching Method which are applicable and have advantages in different situations. We describe here some of the solutions which have been developed grouped by problem
Single Crack
The simplest problem to consider is one where there are only two semi-infinite plates of identical properties separated by a crack. A related problem in acoustics was considered by Kouzov 1963 who used an integral representation of the problem to solve it explicitly using the Riemann-Hilbert technique. Recently the crack problem has been considered by Squire and Dixon 2000 and Williams and Squire 2002 using a Green function method applicable to infinitely deep water and they obtained simple expressions for the reflection and transmission coefficients. Squire and Dixon 2001 extended the single crack problem to a multiple crack problem in which the semi-infinite regions are separated by a region consisting of a finite number of plates of finite size with all plates having identical properties. Evans and Porter 2005 further considered the multiple crack problem for finitely deep water and provided an explicit solution.
We present here the solution of Evans and Porter 2005 for the simple case of a single crack with waves incident from normal (they also considered multiple cracks and waves incident from different angles). The solution of Evans and Porter 2005 expresses the potential [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] in terms of a linear combination of the incident wave and certain source functions located at the crack. Along with satisfying the field and boundary conditions, these source functions satisfy the jump conditions in the displacements and gradients across the crack. They first define [math]\displaystyle{ \chi(x,z) }[/math] to be the Two-Dimensional solution to the Free-Surface Green Function for a Floating Elastic Plate given by
[math]\displaystyle{ \chi(x,z) = -i\sum_{n=-2}^\infty\frac{\sin{(k_n h)}\cos{(k(n)(z-h))}}{2\alpha C_n}e^{-k_n|x|},\,\,\,(1) }[/math]
where
[math]\displaystyle{ C_n=\frac{1}{2}\left(h + \frac{(5\beta k_n ^4 + 1 - \alpha\gamma)\sin^2{(k_n h)}}{\alpha}\right), }[/math]
and [math]\displaystyle{ k_n }[/math] are the solutions of the Dispersion Relation for a Floating Elastic Plate.
Consequently, the source functions for a single crack at [math]\displaystyle{ x=0 }[/math] can be defined as
[math]\displaystyle{ \psi_s(x,z)= \beta\chi_{xx}(x,z),\,\,\, \psi_a(x,z)= \beta\chi_{xxx}(x,z),\,\,\,(2) }[/math]
It can easily be shown that [math]\displaystyle{ \psi_s }[/math] is symmetric about [math]\displaystyle{ x = 0 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \psi_a }[/math] is antisymmetric about [math]\displaystyle{ x = 0 }[/math].
Substituting (1) into (2) gives
[math]\displaystyle{ \psi_s(x,z)= { -\frac{\beta}{\alpha} \sum_{n=-2}^\infty \frac{g_n\cos{(k_n(z+h))}}{2k_{xn}C_n}e^{k_n|x|} }, \psi_a(x,z)= { {\rm sgn}(x) i\frac{\beta}{\alpha}\sum_{n=-2}^\infty \frac{g_n'\cos{(k_n(z+h))}}{2k_{xn}C_n}e^{k_n|x|}}, }[/math]
where
[math]\displaystyle{ g_n = ik_n^3 \sin{k_n h},\,\,\,\, g'_n= -k_n^4 \sin{k_n h}. }[/math]
We then express the solution to the problem as a linear combination of the incident wave and pairs of source functions at each crack,
[math]\displaystyle{ \phi(x,z) = e^{-k_0 x}\frac{\cos(k_0(z+h))}{\cos(k_0h)} + (P\psi_s(x,z) + Q\psi_a(x,z))\,\,\,(3) }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ Q }[/math] are coefficients to be solved which represent the jump in the gradient and elevation respectively of the plates across the crack [math]\displaystyle{ x = a_j }[/math]. The coefficients [math]\displaystyle{ P }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ Q }[/math] are found by applying the edge conditions and to the [math]\displaystyle{ z }[/math] derivative of [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] at [math]\displaystyle{ z=0 }[/math],
[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\left. \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}\right|_{x=0,z=0}=0,\,\,\, {\rm and}\,\,\,\, \frac{\partial^3}{\partial x^3}\left. \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z}\right|_{x=0,z=0}=0. }[/math]
The reflection and transmission coefficients, [math]\displaystyle{ R }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ T }[/math] can be found from (3) by taking the limits as [math]\displaystyle{ x\rightarrow\pm\infty }[/math] to obtain
[math]\displaystyle{ R = {- \frac{\beta}{\alpha} (g'_0Q + ig_0P)} }[/math]
and
[math]\displaystyle{ T= 1 + {\frac{\beta}{\alpha}(g'_0Q - ig_0P)} }[/math]
Two Semi-Infinite Plates of Different Properties
The next most simple problem is two semi-infinite plates of different properties. Often one of the plates is taken to be open water which makes the problem simpler. In general, the solution method developed for open water can be extended to two plates of different properties, the exception to this is the Residue Calculus solution which applies only when one of the semi-infinite regions is water.
Wiener-Hopf
The solution to the problem of two semi-infinite plates with different properties can be solved by the Wiener-Hopf method. The first work on this problem was by Evans and Davies 1968 but they did not actually develop the method sufficiently to be able to calculate the solution. The explicit solution was not found until the work of ...
Eigenfunction Matching Method
The eigenfunction matching solution was developed by Fox and Squire 1994. Essentially the solution is expanded on either side of the crack.
