Difference between revisions of "McIver 1996"

From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (McIver (1996) moved to McIver 1996a)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
M. McIver 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. ''Journal of Fluid Mechanics'', '''315''', 257-266.
+
[[Maureen McIver|M. McIver]] 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. ''Journal of Fluid Mechanics'', '''315''', 257-266.
  
 
This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is
 
This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is
Line 5: Line 5:
 
potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting
 
potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting
 
point for the construction of [[Trapped Modes]].
 
point for the construction of [[Trapped Modes]].
 +
 +
[[Category:Reference]]

Latest revision as of 01:33, 2 June 2006

M. McIver 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 315, 257-266.

This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is not unique. The proof relied on constructing a counter example by producing a wave-free potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting point for the construction of Trapped Modes.