Difference between revisions of "Removing the Depth Dependence"

From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
We are considering the [[Frequency Domain Problem]] for linear wave waves.
+
We are considering the [[Frequency Domain Problem]] for linear wave waves.  
If we have a problem in which the water depth is of constant depth <math>z=-h </math> (we are assuming
+
{{fixed body finite depth equations in two dimensions}}
the free surface is at <math>z=0</math>) and all the scatterers are of constant cross sections and
+
 
extend throughout the depth then we can remove the depth dependence by assuming
+
If we have a problem in which all the scatterers are of constant cross sections so
 +
that
 +
<center>
 +
<math>\partial\Omega = \partial\hat{\Omega} \times z\in[-h,0]
 +
</math>
 +
</center>
 +
where <math>\partial\hat{\Omega} </math> is a function only of <math>x,y</math>
 +
i.e. the boundary of the scattering bodies is uniform with respect to depth.
 +
Then we can remove the depth dependence by assuming
 
that the dependence on depth is given by  
 
that the dependence on depth is given by  
 
<center>
 
<center>

Revision as of 08:54, 23 August 2008

We are considering the Frequency Domain Problem for linear wave waves. The Standard Linear Wave Scattering Problem in Finite Depth for a fixed body is

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \Delta\phi &=0, &-h\lt z\lt 0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \Omega \\ \partial_z\phi &= 0, &z=-h, \\ \partial_z \phi &= \alpha \phi, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \end{align} }[/math]


(note that the last expression can be obtained from combining the expressions:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \partial_z \phi &= -\mathrm{i} \omega \zeta, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \\ \mathrm{i} \omega \phi &= g\zeta, &z=0,\,\,\mathbf{x} \in \partial \Omega_{\mathrm{F}}, \end{align} }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha = \omega^2/g \, }[/math]) The body boundary condition for a rigid body is just

[math]\displaystyle{ \partial_{n}\phi=0,\ \ \mathbf{x}\in\partial\Omega_{\mathrm{B}}, }[/math]

The equation is subject to some radiation conditions at infinity. We assume the following. [math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{I}}\, }[/math] is a plane wave travelling in the [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] direction,

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{I}}(x,z)=A \phi_0(z) e^{\mathrm{i} k x} \, }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is the wave amplitude (in potential) [math]\displaystyle{ \mathrm{i} k }[/math] is the positive imaginary solution of the Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface (note we are assuming that the time dependence is of the form [math]\displaystyle{ \exp(-\mathrm{i}\omega t) }[/math]) and

[math]\displaystyle{ \phi_0(z) =\frac{\cosh k(z+h)}{\cosh k h} }[/math]

In two-dimensions the Sommerfeld Radiation Condition is

[math]\displaystyle{ \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial|x|} - \mathrm{i} k \right) (\phi-\phi^{\mathrm{{I}}})=0,\;\mathrm{{as\;}}|x|\rightarrow\infty\mathrm{.} }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \phi^{\mathrm{{I}}} }[/math] is the incident potential.

If we have a problem in which all the scatterers are of constant cross sections so that

[math]\displaystyle{ \partial\Omega = \partial\hat{\Omega} \times z\in[-h,0] }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ \partial\hat{\Omega} }[/math] is a function only of [math]\displaystyle{ x,y }[/math] i.e. the boundary of the scattering bodies is uniform with respect to depth. Then we can remove the depth dependence by assuming that the dependence on depth is given by

[math]\displaystyle{ \Phi(x,y,z) = \frac{\cosh \big( k (z+h) \big)}{\cosh(k h)} \phi(x,y) }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math] is the positive root of the Dispersion Relation for a Free Surface. Since [math]\displaystyle{ \Phi }[/math] satisfies Laplace's Equation, then [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] satisfies Helmholtz's Equation

[math]\displaystyle{ \nabla^2 \phi - k^2 \phi = 0 }[/math]

in the region not occupied by the scatterers.