Difference between revisions of "Introduction to KdV"

From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 64: Line 64:
 
in a cubic well.
 
in a cubic well.
  
We can choose the constants so that <math>A_{0}=A_{1}=0</math> and then we have a
+
The constant <math>A_0</math> has no effect on our solution so we can set it to be zero.
 +
We can choose the constant <math>A_{1}=0</math> and then we have a
 
maximum at <math>f=0</math>. There is a solution which rolls from this at <math>t=-\infty </math>
 
maximum at <math>f=0</math>. There is a solution which rolls from this at <math>t=-\infty </math>
 
and then runs up the other side and finally returns to the maximum at <math>
 
and then runs up the other side and finally returns to the maximum at <math>
Line 77: Line 78:
 
If we chose <math>A_{1}=0</math> then we obtain two equilibria at <math>(f,v)=\left(
 
If we chose <math>A_{1}=0</math> then we obtain two equilibria at <math>(f,v)=\left(
 
0,0\right) </math> and <math>(3/c,0).</math> If we analysis these equilibria we find the
 
0,0\right) </math> and <math>(3/c,0).</math> If we analysis these equilibria we find the
first is a saddle and the second is difficult to classify. There is a
+
first is a saddle and the second is a nonlinear center (it is neither repelling nor
homoclinic connection which connects the equilibrium point at the origin.
+
attracting). There is a
 +
homoclinic connection which connects the equilibrium point at the origin. This holoclinic
 +
connection represents the solitary wave.  Within this holmolinic connection
 +
lie periodic orbits which represent the cnoidal waves.
  
 
==Formula for the solitary and cnoidal wave.==
 
==Formula for the solitary and cnoidal wave.==

Revision as of 01:34, 18 August 2010

Nonlinear PDE's Course
Current Topic Introduction to KdV
Next Topic Numerical Solution of the KdV
Previous Topic Nonlinear Shallow Water Waves




The KdV (Korteweg-De Vries) equation is one of the most important non-linear pde's. It was originally derived to model shallow water waves with weak nonlinearities, but it has a wide variety of applications. The derivation of the KdV is given in KdV Equation Derivation. The KdV equation is written as

[math]\displaystyle{ \partial _{t}u+6u\partial _{x}u+\partial _{x}^{3}u=0. }[/math]

Travelling Wave Solution

The KdV equation posesses travelling wave solutions. One particular travelling wave solution is called a soltion and it was discovered experimentally by John Scott Russell in 1834 and was not understoon theoretically until the work of Korteweg and De Vries in 1895.

We begin with the assumption that the wave travels with contant form, i.e. is of the form

[math]\displaystyle{ u\left( x,t\right) =f\left( x-ct\right) }[/math]

Note that in this equation the parameter [math]\displaystyle{ c }[/math] is an unknown as is the function [math]\displaystyle{ f. }[/math] Only very special values of [math]\displaystyle{ c }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ f }[/math] will give travelling waves. We introduce the coordinate [math]\displaystyle{ \zeta = x - ct }[/math]. If we substitute this expression into the KdV equation we obtain

[math]\displaystyle{ -c\frac{df}{dx}+6f\frac{df}{d\zeta}+\frac{d^{3}f}{d\zeta^{3}}=0 }[/math]

We can integrate this with respect to [math]\displaystyle{ \zeta }[/math] to obtain

[math]\displaystyle{ -cf+3f^{2}+\frac{d^{2}f}{d\zeta^{2}}=A_{1} }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is a constant of integration.

If think about this equation as Newton's second law in a potential well [math]\displaystyle{ V(f) }[/math] then the equation is

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{d^{2}f}{d\zeta^{2}}=\frac{dV}{df} }[/math]

We can write this equation as

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{d^{2}f}{d\zeta^{2}}=A_{1}+cf-3f^{2} }[/math]

The equation for Newton's second law in a potential well [math]\displaystyle{ V(f) }[/math] is given by

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{d^{2}f}{d\zeta^{2}}=-\frac{dV}{df} }[/math]

Therefore the potential well is given by

[math]\displaystyle{ V\left( f\right) =-A_{0}-A_{1}f-\frac{2}f^{2}+f^{3} }[/math]

Therefore our equation for [math]\displaystyle{ f }[/math] may be thought of as the motion of a particle in a cubic well.

The constant [math]\displaystyle{ A_0 }[/math] has no effect on our solution so we can set it to be zero. We can choose the constant [math]\displaystyle{ A_{1}=0 }[/math] and then we have a maximum at [math]\displaystyle{ f=0 }[/math]. There is a solution which rolls from this at [math]\displaystyle{ t=-\infty }[/math] and then runs up the other side and finally returns to the maximum at [math]\displaystyle{ t=\infty . }[/math] This corresponds to a solitary wave solution.

We can also think about the equation as a first order system using [math]\displaystyle{ f^{^{\prime }}=v. }[/math] This gives us

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{matrix} \frac{dv}{d\zeta} &=&A_{1}+cf-3f^{2} \\ \frac{df}{d\zeta} &=&v \end{matrix} }[/math]

If we chose [math]\displaystyle{ A_{1}=0 }[/math] then we obtain two equilibria at [math]\displaystyle{ (f,v)=\left( 0,0\right) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ (3/c,0). }[/math] If we analysis these equilibria we find the first is a saddle and the second is a nonlinear center (it is neither repelling nor attracting). There is a homoclinic connection which connects the equilibrium point at the origin. This holoclinic connection represents the solitary wave. Within this holmolinic connection lie periodic orbits which represent the cnoidal waves.

Formula for the solitary and cnoidal wave.

We can also integrate the equation

[math]\displaystyle{ -cf+3f^{2}+\frac{d^{2}f}{dx^{2}}=A_{1} }[/math]

by multiplying by [math]\displaystyle{ f^{\prime } }[/math]and integrating. This gives us

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\left( f^{^{\prime }}\right) ^{2}}{2}=A_{0}+A_{1}f }[/math]

We write this equation as

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{\left( f^{^{\prime }}\right) ^{2}}{2}=A_{0}+A_{1}f+\frac{2} f^{2}-f^{3}=-V(f) }[/math]

This is nothing more than the equation for conservation of energy for our moving particle. We know that the solitary wave solution is found when [math]\displaystyle{ A_{0}=A_{1}=0. }[/math] This gives us

[math]\displaystyle{ \left( f^{^{\prime }}\right) ^{2}=f^{2}\left( c-2f\right) }[/math]

This can be solved by separation of variables to give

[math]\displaystyle{ \int \frac{df}{f\sqrt{c-2f}}=\int dx }[/math]

We then substitute

[math]\displaystyle{ f=\frac{1}{2}c\,\mathrm{sech}^{2}\left( s\right) }[/math]

and note that

[math]\displaystyle{ c-2f=c\left( 1-\mathrm{sech}^{2}\left( s\right) \right) =c\tanh ^{2}\left( f\right) }[/math]

and that

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{df}{ds}=-c\frac{\sinh \left( f\right) }{\cosh ^{3}\left( f\right) } }[/math]

This means that

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{matrix} \int \frac{df}{f\sqrt{c-2f}} &=&-\frac{2}{\sqrt{c}}\int \frac{\sinh \left( f\right) }{\mathrm{sech}^{2}\left( s\right) \tanh \left( f\right) \cosh ^{3}\left( f\right) }ds \\ &=&-\frac{2}{\sqrt{c}}s \end{matrix} }[/math]

This gives us

[math]\displaystyle{ -\frac{2}{\sqrt{s}}=x+a }[/math]

Therefore

[math]\displaystyle{ f=\frac{1}{2}c\,\mathrm{sech}^{2}\left( \frac{\sqrt{c}}{2}\left( x+a\right) \right) }[/math]

Of course we assumed that [math]\displaystyle{ x=x-ct }[/math] so the formula for the solitary wave is given by

[math]\displaystyle{ f\left( x-ct\right) =\frac{1}{2}c\,\mathrm{sech}^{2}\left[ \frac{\sqrt{c}}{2}\left( x-ct+a\right) \right] }[/math]

Note that a solution exists for each [math]\displaystyle{ c }[/math], and that the amplitude is proportional to [math]\displaystyle{ c. }[/math] All of this was discovered experimentally by Russel. We also have cnoidal wave solutions, which are periodic waves, of the form

[math]\displaystyle{ f\left( x-ct\right) =a+b \mathrm{cn}^{2}\left( x-ct\right) }[/math]

where [math]\displaystyle{ cn }[/math] is a Jacobi Elliptic function. In the limit the two solution agree.